Any Successful Turbo JDM ITR Motors Out There? (stock motor)
I have searched for a few hours (no kidding) on H-T regarding turbo'd JDM ITR motors. I came up with either USDM ITRs boosted or "comments" on turbo setups, how its not going to work. I just want to see if anyone has seen/heard/done a turbo setup on a jdm itr motor, low boost of course. I am a little hesitant 'cause of the obvious, COMPRESSION RATIO. Not sure if I want to run a thicker HG, 'cause that would mean more boost.
I will only want to boost 7 psi max. What I will be running:
- '99 spec jdm itr motor
- Full race type manifold
- T3/T4 hybrid .59 trim
- RC 750cc injectors, people ask why so large. %30 duty cycle rather then %80 with 550s.
- Holley intank fuel pump FI application
- Hondata s200
- Tial 38mm WG
Thanks for any input, and once again... I DID SEARCH!!!!
I will only want to boost 7 psi max. What I will be running:
- '99 spec jdm itr motor
- Full race type manifold
- T3/T4 hybrid .59 trim
- RC 750cc injectors, people ask why so large. %30 duty cycle rather then %80 with 550s.
- Holley intank fuel pump FI application
- Hondata s200
- Tial 38mm WG
Thanks for any input, and once again... I DID SEARCH!!!!
750's for 7psi...if u want only a 30% duty cycle at WOT, its a waste of money.
if its a 99 spec jdm itr, that compression ratio is up there, and so is the overlap.
you'll make some peaky power. my friend turbo'ed his 98 spec itr a while back, and it didnt last too long. fried 3 sets of piston rings gradually until his car didnt start. although it was a drag III kit with an FMU and stock injectors...so maybe with a good tune and fuel management, it wouldnt have had died so shortly...
he went back to his NA is best mentality.
with a hi comp ratio, tuning is more critical, and much less forgiving to error.
if i had a 99 itr engine, i would leave it NA. a big reason i went turbo, is because i have an LS. read my sig, it explains my mentality.
if its a 99 spec jdm itr, that compression ratio is up there, and so is the overlap.
you'll make some peaky power. my friend turbo'ed his 98 spec itr a while back, and it didnt last too long. fried 3 sets of piston rings gradually until his car didnt start. although it was a drag III kit with an FMU and stock injectors...so maybe with a good tune and fuel management, it wouldnt have had died so shortly...
he went back to his NA is best mentality.
with a hi comp ratio, tuning is more critical, and much less forgiving to error.
if i had a 99 itr engine, i would leave it NA. a big reason i went turbo, is because i have an LS. read my sig, it explains my mentality.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spec R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">750's for 7psi...if u want only a 30% duty cycle at WOT, its a waste of money.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's not like the 750's are that much more than the 550's. What if your plans change?
Sell the ITR and get a GSR. GG
</TD></TR></TABLE>
It's not like the 750's are that much more than the 550's. What if your plans change?
Sell the ITR and get a GSR. GG
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spec R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">750's for 7psi...if u want only a 30% duty cycle at WOT, its a waste of money.
if its a 99 spec jdm itr, that compression ratio is up there, and so is the overlap.
you'll make some peaky power. my friend turbo'ed his 98 spec itr a while back, and it didnt last too long. fried 3 sets of piston rings gradually until his car didnt start. although it was a drag III kit with an FMU and stock injectors...so maybe with a good tune and fuel management, it wouldnt have had died so shortly...
he went back to his NA is best mentality.
with a hi comp ratio, tuning is more critical, and much less forgiving to error.
if i had a 99 itr engine, i would leave it NA. a big reason i went turbo, is because i have an LS. read my sig, it explains my mentality.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well, the 750s are the same price as 550s (this is a kit my friend is building).
I am hoping hondata would be good enough for tuning.
What about running an inlinepro headgasket, which is 2mm thick, at 7psi. Any thoughts on that?
if its a 99 spec jdm itr, that compression ratio is up there, and so is the overlap.
you'll make some peaky power. my friend turbo'ed his 98 spec itr a while back, and it didnt last too long. fried 3 sets of piston rings gradually until his car didnt start. although it was a drag III kit with an FMU and stock injectors...so maybe with a good tune and fuel management, it wouldnt have had died so shortly...
he went back to his NA is best mentality.
with a hi comp ratio, tuning is more critical, and much less forgiving to error.
if i had a 99 itr engine, i would leave it NA. a big reason i went turbo, is because i have an LS. read my sig, it explains my mentality.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well, the 750s are the same price as 550s (this is a kit my friend is building).
I am hoping hondata would be good enough for tuning.
What about running an inlinepro headgasket, which is 2mm thick, at 7psi. Any thoughts on that?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iiilgsrlll »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
It's not like the 750's are that much more than the 550's. What if your plans change?
Sell the ITR and get a GSR. GG
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The GSR is still in the backyard.
It's not like the 750's are that much more than the 550's. What if your plans change?
Sell the ITR and get a GSR. GG
</TD></TR></TABLE>The GSR is still in the backyard.
if your at 80% with the 550's then thats perfect...dont try to idle a larger injector then you need to...
but your not going to even reach 80% with 550's...those will be to big...
at 300bhp with a bsfc of .65 (which is rather high) youll need 39lb injectors
39lb injectors = about 410cc's
a set of 440's would do you good...
or if your on a budget a set of dsm injectors would work they are 450cc and rather cheap..can usually get a set for about 100-130
Modified by 2k.civic.si at 8:59 AM 4/9/2006
but your not going to even reach 80% with 550's...those will be to big...
at 300bhp with a bsfc of .65 (which is rather high) youll need 39lb injectors
39lb injectors = about 410cc's
a set of 440's would do you good...
or if your on a budget a set of dsm injectors would work they are 450cc and rather cheap..can usually get a set for about 100-130
Modified by 2k.civic.si at 8:59 AM 4/9/2006
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2k.civic.si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if your at 80% with the 550's then thats perfect...dont try to idle a larger injector then you need to...
but your not going to even reach 80% with 550's...those will be to big...
at 300bhp with a bsfc of .65 (which is rather high) youll need 39lb injectors
39lb injectors = about 410cc's
a set of 440's would do you good...
or if your on a budget a set of dsm injectors would work they are 450cc and rather cheap..can usually get a set for about 100-130
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks for the numbers.
Either way, I will have enough fuel.
Maybe you can round up some more numbers for me. If I were to get a 2mm headgasket, where would that put me... 9:8?
Thanks. LOL.
but your not going to even reach 80% with 550's...those will be to big...
at 300bhp with a bsfc of .65 (which is rather high) youll need 39lb injectors
39lb injectors = about 410cc's
a set of 440's would do you good...
or if your on a budget a set of dsm injectors would work they are 450cc and rather cheap..can usually get a set for about 100-130
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks for the numbers.
Either way, I will have enough fuel.Maybe you can round up some more numbers for me. If I were to get a 2mm headgasket, where would that put me... 9:8?
Thanks. LOL.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dut »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Maybe you can round up some more numbers for me. If I were to get a 2mm headgasket, where would that put me... 9:8?
Thanks. LOL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
THat'll put you at a $4500 GSR motor with a red valve cover.
Maybe you can round up some more numbers for me. If I were to get a 2mm headgasket, where would that put me... 9:8?
Thanks. LOL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
THat'll put you at a $4500 GSR motor with a red valve cover.
running larger then needed injectors will comprimise idle and partial throttle driveability and there is other reasons i dont feel like explaining.... im currently down here in san diego at efi university taking classes
i wouldnt argue with me while the info is fresh in my head 
http://www.efi101.com ....after tommorow ill be efi certified
im currently being taught by ben strader the senior instructor at efi
i wouldnt argue with me while the info is fresh in my head 
http://www.efi101.com ....after tommorow ill be efi certified
im currently being taught by ben strader the senior instructor at efi
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iiilgsrlll »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
THat'll put you at a $4500 GSR motor with a red valve cover.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i know you guys know each other and joking around and know that an ITR is more than just a GSR with higher compression, but yeah...if he has a gsr lying around...booost that instead...
edit - i reread your first post.
i guess not too many people who have 98-up spec ITR's have gone turbo. all i know is my friend from a few years back killed his engine...but thats because he was still using his NA fuel and ignition (too aggressive for boost) maps.
THat'll put you at a $4500 GSR motor with a red valve cover.
</TD></TR></TABLE>i know you guys know each other and joking around and know that an ITR is more than just a GSR with higher compression, but yeah...if he has a gsr lying around...booost that instead...
edit - i reread your first post.
i guess not too many people who have 98-up spec ITR's have gone turbo. all i know is my friend from a few years back killed his engine...but thats because he was still using his NA fuel and ignition (too aggressive for boost) maps.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dut »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Thanks for the numbers.
Either way, I will have enough fuel.
Maybe you can round up some more numbers for me. If I were to get a 2mm headgasket, where would that put me... 9:8?
Thanks. LOL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
around 9.5:1
Thanks for the numbers.
Either way, I will have enough fuel.Maybe you can round up some more numbers for me. If I were to get a 2mm headgasket, where would that put me... 9:8?
Thanks. LOL.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
around 9.5:1
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2k.civic.si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
around 9.5:1</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spec R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i know you guys know each other and joking around and know that an ITR is more than just a GSR with higher compression, but yeah...if he has a gsr lying around...booost that instead...
edit - i reread your first post.
i guess not too many people who have 98-up spec ITR's have gone turbo. all i know is my friend from a few years back killed his engine...but thats because he was still using his NA fuel and ignition (too aggressive for boost) maps.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea, Ling likes to fuuck with me since I am ALWAYS undecided on what I want to do, even eating somewhere. HAHAHAA.
The GSR setup is sold, just holding it until he gets back from overseas.
Also, SPECR: NA has crossed my mind and was actually my original plan. Fully built head, PNP. I have never had a turbo car, so I wanted to try something new.
Turbo or NA will cost me about the same.
around 9.5:1</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spec R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i know you guys know each other and joking around and know that an ITR is more than just a GSR with higher compression, but yeah...if he has a gsr lying around...booost that instead...
edit - i reread your first post.
i guess not too many people who have 98-up spec ITR's have gone turbo. all i know is my friend from a few years back killed his engine...but thats because he was still using his NA fuel and ignition (too aggressive for boost) maps.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yea, Ling likes to fuuck with me since I am ALWAYS undecided on what I want to do, even eating somewhere. HAHAHAA.
The GSR setup is sold, just holding it until he gets back from overseas.

Also, SPECR: NA has crossed my mind and was actually my original plan. Fully built head, PNP. I have never had a turbo car, so I wanted to try something new.
Turbo or NA will cost me about the same.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dut »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Also, SPECR: NA has crossed my mind and was actually my original plan. Fully built head, PNP. I have never had a turbo car, so I wanted to try something new.
Turbo or NA will cost me about the same. </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah i started off with an LS, so its different for me. swapping out my LS for an ITR swap would be 4500 or so, then turbo-ing that would be an addition 2000 bucks...it doesnt seem too logical financially, when i can have one bad *** built turbo LS for 6500, if i ever decided to spend that much.
Have you ever been in a WRX, STi, Evo, or Turbo honda before?
Also, SPECR: NA has crossed my mind and was actually my original plan. Fully built head, PNP. I have never had a turbo car, so I wanted to try something new.
Turbo or NA will cost me about the same. </TD></TR></TABLE>yeah i started off with an LS, so its different for me. swapping out my LS for an ITR swap would be 4500 or so, then turbo-ing that would be an addition 2000 bucks...it doesnt seem too logical financially, when i can have one bad *** built turbo LS for 6500, if i ever decided to spend that much.
Have you ever been in a WRX, STi, Evo, or Turbo honda before?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spec R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yeah i started off with an LS, so its different for me. swapping out my LS for an ITR swap would be 4500 or so, then turbo-ing that would be an addition 2000 bucks...it doesnt seem too logical financially, when i can have one bad *** built turbo LS for 6500, if i ever decided to spend that much.
Have you ever been in a WRX, STi, Evo, or Turbo honda before?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes, I have been in a few turbo hondas and it felt great. My friend has a nice EVO9 and I have only raced it with my m3.
yeah i started off with an LS, so its different for me. swapping out my LS for an ITR swap would be 4500 or so, then turbo-ing that would be an addition 2000 bucks...it doesnt seem too logical financially, when i can have one bad *** built turbo LS for 6500, if i ever decided to spend that much.
Have you ever been in a WRX, STi, Evo, or Turbo honda before?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes, I have been in a few turbo hondas and it felt great. My friend has a nice EVO9 and I have only raced it with my m3.
here are my results @ 6psi on mustang dyno
jdm gsr motor
jdm itr pistons- 11.3 cp
sp manifold
skunk2 im
jdm itr tb
precision sc-61 turbo
3 inch dp
tial 38 mm wg
precision ic
aem fuel rail
aeromotive fpr
walbro fp
act hd clutch
ctr crank pulley
ctr camshaft
rc 550 cc injectors
hondata s300


jdm gsr motor
jdm itr pistons- 11.3 cp
sp manifold
skunk2 im
jdm itr tb
precision sc-61 turbo
3 inch dp
tial 38 mm wg
precision ic
aem fuel rail
aeromotive fpr
walbro fp
act hd clutch
ctr crank pulley
ctr camshaft
rc 550 cc injectors
hondata s300


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1Quikgsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">here are my results @ 6psi on mustang dyno
jdm gsr motor
jdm itr pistons- 11.3 cp
sp manifold
skunk2 im
jdm itr tb
precision sc-61 turbo
3 inch dp
tial 38 mm wg
precision ic
aem fuel rail
aeromotive fpr
walbro fp
act hd clutch
ctr crank pulley
ctr camshaft
rc 550 cc injectors
hondata s300
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nice.
Sounds similar to the **** I would be using, turbo kit wise.
jdm gsr motor
jdm itr pistons- 11.3 cp
sp manifold
skunk2 im
jdm itr tb
precision sc-61 turbo
3 inch dp
tial 38 mm wg
precision ic
aem fuel rail
aeromotive fpr
walbro fp
act hd clutch
ctr crank pulley
ctr camshaft
rc 550 cc injectors
hondata s300
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nice.
Sounds similar to the **** I would be using, turbo kit wise.
i hate to tell you this, but that is an INaccurate reading of HP on an MD dyno. your HP@50mph should not be 9.5, or 9.o...............
it should be 15-16.0
this is how people convert or "skew" numbers on an MD dyno, almost 300hp on 6psi is a little high in my book, and the HP# is a dead giveaway
it should be 15-16.0
this is how people convert or "skew" numbers on an MD dyno, almost 300hp on 6psi is a little high in my book, and the HP# is a dead giveaway
talk to TurbodCX... he has a 99 JDM ITR stock motor
taken from his sig...
99 JDM ITR Swap
PT 70
AEM EMS
631whp/4016wtq@21psi(Stock Motor!!)
10.51@140.58 w/ 1.67 60'
taken from his sig...
99 JDM ITR Swap
PT 70
AEM EMS
631whp/4016wtq@21psi(Stock Motor!!)
10.51@140.58 w/ 1.67 60'
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SPOON_BeIgHtEeNsEe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">talk to TurbodCX... he has a 99 JDM ITR stock motor
taken from his sig...
99 JDM ITR Swap
PT 70
AEM EMS
631whp/4016wtq@21psi <FONT SIZE="4">(Stock Motor!!)</FONT>
10.51@140.58 w/ 1.67 60' </TD></TR></TABLE>
Uh.... WTF.
taken from his sig...
99 JDM ITR Swap
PT 70
AEM EMS
631whp/4016wtq@21psi <FONT SIZE="4">(Stock Motor!!)</FONT>
10.51@140.58 w/ 1.67 60' </TD></TR></TABLE>
Uh.... WTF.



