skunk 2 intake manifold?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xtream_V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sup guys i was wondering if the skunk 2 intake manifold is worth the money in a type R???</TD></TR></TABLE>
The magic ball says no.
Its a copy of the ITR manifold... no benefits.
The magic ball says no.
Its a copy of the ITR manifold... no benefits.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xtream_V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sup guys i was wondering if the skunk 2 intake manifold is worth the money in a type R???</TD></TR></TABLE>
Unless you are thinking of the JGEdelbrock setup, the Skunk2 setup wont do anything for an ITR (they are the same). I imagine JB Edelbrock gives you a bit more top end (when needed) because it has the shorter runners.
Unless you are thinking of the JGEdelbrock setup, the Skunk2 setup wont do anything for an ITR (they are the same). I imagine JB Edelbrock gives you a bit more top end (when needed) because it has the shorter runners.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,061
Likes: 0
From: bumper to bumper with AMERIE
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xtream_V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is there any intake manifold that i could benifit from having an ITR other then it elderbrock setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>
a better question...why do you want to replace the stock IM?
is there no other bolt on part that you could buy besides an IM that would get you more hp?
a better question...why do you want to replace the stock IM?
is there no other bolt on part that you could buy besides an IM that would get you more hp?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xtream_V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">is there any intake manifold that i could benifit from having an ITR other then it elderbrock setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>
The stock manifold is great for minor mods. Unless you have headwork done like oversized valves and P&P, I would stick with the stock manifold. FWIW, I believe Bradstard here on the boards has a 2.0 liter ITR engine with a stock intake manifold.
The stock manifold is great for minor mods. Unless you have headwork done like oversized valves and P&P, I would stick with the stock manifold. FWIW, I believe Bradstard here on the boards has a 2.0 liter ITR engine with a stock intake manifold.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ITR-2001 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why not just get your IM ported </TD></TR></TABLE>Or another expensive way is to extrude honing.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ghandi_R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The AEBS is a better upgrade from the stock ITR IM</TD></TR></TABLE>
Got a dyno chart to prove that?
Also, you can't generically say that it is an upgrade. A turbo car could benefit from changing to a bigger volume intake manifold, but a N/A car with bolt-on's may lose power with the same intake manifold.
Got a dyno chart to prove that?
Also, you can't generically say that it is an upgrade. A turbo car could benefit from changing to a bigger volume intake manifold, but a N/A car with bolt-on's may lose power with the same intake manifold.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by migs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The stock manifold is great for minor mods. Unless you have headwork done like oversized valves and P&P, I would stick with the stock manifold. FWIW, I believe Bradstard here on the boards has a 2.0 liter ITR engine with a stock intake manifold.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah and bradstards car is sick too check the videos , but stock should be fine
</TD></TR></TABLE>yeah and bradstards car is sick too check the videos , but stock should be fine
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by migs »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
FWIW, I believe Bradstard here on the boards has a 2.0 liter ITR engine with a stock intake manifold.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
He runs the Edelbrock one IIRC.
FWIW, I believe Bradstard here on the boards has a 2.0 liter ITR engine with a stock intake manifold.
</TD></TR></TABLE>He runs the Edelbrock one IIRC.
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere in a DC2.... Supporting the ITR Militia, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM Factor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Who has a pic of the carbon fiber IM he might want to see that.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats the AIR IM, something like 1300 dollars.... But Nice item.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Thats the AIR IM, something like 1300 dollars.... But Nice item.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Reid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Also, you can't generically say that it is an upgrade. A turbo car could benefit from changing to a bigger volume intake manifold, but a N/A car with bolt-on's may lose power with the same intake manifold.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so are you tring to say if i got the AEBS IM on my n/a ITR i will lose out power over stock IM?
Now i want to you come up with a dyno to prove that
i dont believe that
i will. once i see the dyn0
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM Factor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why do you want anything else? The stock one is fine even if ya did run a lot of power. Who has a pic of the carbon fiber IM he might want to see that.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 01ITR#173DC2ning »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats the AIR IM, something like 1300 dollars.... But Nice item.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i almost got the AIR CF IM but went with cam package instead..
now AIR came out with something better than their CF IM
Modified by itr1244 at 10:44 PM 1/10/2006
Modified by itr1244 at 11:18 PM 1/10/2006
Also, you can't generically say that it is an upgrade. A turbo car could benefit from changing to a bigger volume intake manifold, but a N/A car with bolt-on's may lose power with the same intake manifold.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so are you tring to say if i got the AEBS IM on my n/a ITR i will lose out power over stock IM?
Now i want to you come up with a dyno to prove that
i dont believe that
i will. once i see the dyn0
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDM Factor »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why do you want anything else? The stock one is fine even if ya did run a lot of power. Who has a pic of the carbon fiber IM he might want to see that.
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 01ITR#173DC2ning »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats the AIR IM, something like 1300 dollars.... But Nice item.</TD></TR></TABLE>
i almost got the AIR CF IM but went with cam package instead..
now AIR came out with something better than their CF IM
Modified by itr1244 at 10:44 PM 1/10/2006
Modified by itr1244 at 11:18 PM 1/10/2006
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by acuracy r »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

</TD></TR></TABLE>
wtf cf intake for the typer any differece in power gains ?

</TD></TR></TABLE>
wtf cf intake for the typer any differece in power gains ?
Yes power gains....
but it certainly isn't a mod you'd perform first....
For $1300.00 you're better off starting with a better header or something.... We don't even know what the original poster has in terms of mods....
but it certainly isn't a mod you'd perform first....
For $1300.00 you're better off starting with a better header or something.... We don't even know what the original poster has in terms of mods....
just to let u know i have a complet msd ignition centerforce dual friction clucth, 8 ilb flywheel, full greddy exaust, aem fuel rail, high flow fuel pump out of a turbo talon that i modified to fit in my R, and a v-afc,
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 11,061
Likes: 0
From: bumper to bumper with AMERIE
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Xtream_V »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just to let u know i have a complet msd ignition centerforce dual friction clucth, 8 ilb flywheel, full greddy exaust, aem fuel rail, high flow fuel pump out of a turbo talon that i modified to fit in my R, and a v-afc, </TD></TR></TABLE>
so all you have is a catback exhaust and you feel you're outflowing the stock ITR manifold?
why do even need these mods???
complet msd ignition
aem fuel rail
high flow fuel pump
wtf is going on in here
so all you have is a catback exhaust and you feel you're outflowing the stock ITR manifold?
why do even need these mods???
complet msd ignition
aem fuel rail
high flow fuel pump
wtf is going on in here




