I'm not sure if my Boss is just plain crazy or a genius, but he recently tuned his sport FWD civic on our dynojet again, this time using N20.

Being in Denver, the dyno is at ~5500FT, so the correction factor is around 1.19 based on the barometric pressure at that time.

Wheel HP: 959.9 WHP
Wheel TQ: 646.6 WTQ

The small dip at the ~6500rpm range is where he left off right after he hit the nitrous becuase the jolt from the nitrous was a bit violent.

This was at 22psi.

His previous best et was 10.40 @ 139mph, when the boost was only at 1 bar, and it made roughly 500whp.

 

wow

 

ask Buck02 what his results were on the dyno after taking his car to close to sea level and redynoing to give you an idea of the power you are really making cause the altitiude screws up the correction factor, etc, etc

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ihaterice &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ask Buck02 what his results were on the dyno after taking his car to close to sea level and redynoing to give you an idea of the power you are really making cause the altitiude screws up the correction factor, etc, etc</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ihaterice &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ask Buck02 what his results were on the dyno after taking his car to close to sea level and redynoing to give you an idea of the power you are really making cause the altitiude screws up the correction factor, etc, etc</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yeah, it could be a problem. Although, the results that I've seen from something like a stock Integra GS-R with something of the same correction factor is right on par of where it should be. Which the boost may completely throw everything off when trying to look at it in proportion.

It still sounds right though, because his 10.4 up here at altitude was only on 14.7psi @ 500whp, which i think is a respectable number for that power... but if you add 8psi and dirrect port, 800+ doesn't seem out of the question at all, let alone the number that he got. But #'s are just #'s at this point anyway.

 

car sounds siiiick. wish I could go for a 5th gear pull in that car lol.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Quik Chris &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm not sure if my Boss is just plain crazy or a genius</TD></TR></TABLE>

I think its a little of both hahahha

I'll vouch for all of these #'s and results. If you look at the second posted graph, it is there to show you the exact correction factor that the dyno calculated and applied. If you do the math, the blue run is right at an uncorrected 805whp. 805 acual whp ain't bad considering our super thin air up here

 

what kind of setup is this?
and what a/a intercooler will support this kind of power?


congrats

 

I'm sure they're good numbers uncorrected, but since you know for a fact that the numbers you posted are not even close, why post them? I promise you you'll get alot more props and respect for posting legit numbers.

Edit: I'm officially making a new rule, nobody is allowed to post corrected numbers or claim corrected numbers from a dynojet at anything over 3000'.

 

wow, thats a lot of power, good luck putting it through 25 inch tires..lol

should be really fast if you can though

 

damn! Any info on the setup?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm sure they're good numbers uncorrected, but since you know for a fact that the numbers you posted are not even close, why post them? I promise you you'll get alot more props and respect for posting legit numbers.

Edit: I'm officially making a new rule, nobody is allowed to post corrected numbers or claim corrected numbers from a dynojet at anything over 3000'. </TD></TR></TABLE>

These graphs were posted because they were the only sheets available when scanner was available for use. That's why the second graph is posted, to show the 1.19 CF. He's not trying to claim anything he didn't do, which is why the printed CF was posted directly after the #'s graph. So, everyone just has to take the # at any point in the graph and divide by 1.19 to see the actual uncorrected value; so, all the legit #'s are there. Nobody's hiding the exact CF

 

It's just as easy to print the legit uncorrected numbers as it is those. Face it, that sheet was printed off for bragging rights. What kind of reaction do you expect to get when posting something like that? This post would have gone totally different had the uncorrected numbers been posted...

 

It's the high altitude that makes us crazy. Not enough oxygen to get to the brain, ya know? I just thought it was a crazy graph for a gas powered car, and figured that a 800+hp sfwd dyno graph might be something that you guys might be interested in seeing. The car is the shops, but it's Sam Park's not mine.

Has anyone else dynoed in the class that high even without the correction factor (808whp)?

Tony, I would have printed the uncorrected one, but I'm not the dyno opperator and don't know WinFas that well, so we're stuck with those 2 instead of 1. That's why both dyno sheets are up there.

...whatever, I just thought it was a great dyno run. Remember, it's just a horsepower number at this point, not an et.

The intercooler is the big precision 750hp core. Turbo is a T67 P-trim running on FAST. I'm not sure what jets he has in the dirrect port. Not sure on the bore, he built the motor.

 

That's it....

I am building a shop with Dyno on top of Mount Everest !!!!

Nice number, but it'll be nice to have a good comparison side by side on corrected graph....

stan

 

WOW i dont see how only 22 psi is making #'s like that???? sure you didnt mean 32 psi??
if so all i can say is WOW

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Timmay &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">WOW i dont see how only 22 psi is making #'s like that???? sure you didnt mean 32 psi??
if so all i can say is WOW</TD></TR></TABLE>

Looks like without nitrous it would be a 600whp curve which would be right at 22psi. Must be a healthy shot, but i'm not sure he could use it even in sfwd/turbo4.

 

so what's the uncorrected numbers?

 

i hate my car

 

Nice Numbers ..my cousin said you guys always build nice hp strong honda. hey what happen to Sam nice coupe that should be done? the one with the nice dash thats made from carbon fiber. gosh it looks so fresh and clean. anyways is that the same hatch or a different one? looks good though. good luck... and hope to see you guys run next year. hope to see all ImportSport cars when i visit CO in spring or bandimere events.

 

well i just dyno'd my car in utah here is the sheet ..LOL

why dont u big HP rock mountain high guys bring ur car to around sea level ....oh PS take the heat gun off the temp sensor on the dyno

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by runsnines &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well i just dyno'd my car in utah here is the sheet ..LOL

why dont u big HP rock mountain high guys bring ur car to around sea level ....oh
PS take the heat gun off the temp sensor on the dyno </TD></TR></TABLE>


500 shot????

 

Eh, I'm done talking about it.

 

Nice numbers.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by runsnines &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well i just dyno'd my car in utah here is the sheet ..LOL

why dont u big HP rock mountain high guys bring ur car to around sea level ....oh PS take the heat gun off the temp sensor on the dyno </TD></TR></TABLE>

Since when is 60°F having the heat gun on the temp sensor?


Modified by Quik Chris at 9:12 PM 10/31/2005