Do my timing numbers look good for a turbo GSR?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 10:25 PM
  #1  
BlueShadow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 4
From: Somewhere in California
Default Do my timing numbers look good for a turbo GSR?

Wassup guys,

I was wondering if you guys could look over my timing numbers and tell me how they look. I did up a manual step retard and I just wanted to be sure I did it right.

Here are my step retard numbers:
0.4 psi - 0.25* per psi
2.1 psi - 0.25* per psi
3.9 psi - 0.50* per psi
5.7 psi - 0.75* per psi
7.5 psi - 0.85* per psi
9.3 psi - 0.95* per psi
11.2 psi - 1* per psi

LOW CAM TIMING


HIGH CAM TIMING


let me know what you guys think
TIA
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 10:31 PM
  #2  
Tchleung's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,593
Likes: 0
From: Penticton, BC, Canada
Default

Way way too conservative
Reply
Old Jul 15, 2005 | 10:40 PM
  #3  
BlueShadow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 4
From: Somewhere in California
Default Re: (Tchleung)

Yup I'm tuning it more for safety not for power. So I wanted to keep it conservative and not too aggressive. This was also when I had a stock motor, soon I'll have a fully built motor though so I'll probably have to adjust the timing to match my new setup.

But if you have another idea for a step retard setup under boost let me know. Also if you guys think I should advance my timing throughout the vacuum portion let me know how much.

Here is what my new setup will be, all work is to be done by earl:
GSR head with Portflow headwork
GSR block sleeved by Benson 83mm bore
LS crank
9.0:1 CP pistons, but according to earl my CR will be 9.4:1
750cc injectors
91 octane gas, looking to make 350-400+ WHP
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 03:14 AM
  #4  
hondaguyef's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,159
Likes: 1
From: Roseville, CA
Default Re: (Tchleung)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tchleung &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Way way too conservative</TD></TR></TABLE>

Even for 91 octane. It would be pointless to run anymore than 7psi at this point because w/ that timing there will be no gains. I wouldn't start the step retard until about 3 psi. Then I.E.
3- .4* per psi
5- .5* per psi
7- .6* per psi
9- .7* per psi
11- .8* per psi
That will still be conservative IMO. Make sure your A/F is solid and you should be good even w/ the 91 oct.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 03:19 AM
  #5  
BlueShadow's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,408
Likes: 4
From: Somewhere in California
Default Re: (hondaguyef)

thanks meng,

I'll redo my step retard and use your numbers.
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 04:49 AM
  #6  
hondaguyef's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,159
Likes: 1
From: Roseville, CA
Default Re: (BlueShadow)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlueShadow &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">thanks meng,

I'll redo my step retard and use your numbers. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Sounds good. Good luck w/ it and read those plugs

Phil
Reply
Old Jul 16, 2005 | 05:00 AM
  #7  
done's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 6,470
Likes: 0
From: www.js-garage.com
Default Re: (Tchleung)

its realiative low
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
1990hondaHF
Forced Induction
4
Oct 26, 2010 06:36 AM
miro_gt
Forced Induction
8
Sep 19, 2005 02:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 AM.