dyno sheet,

here's a video.
http://members.shaw.ca/barcher/BrentsDyno.wmv
not the best video, but hey its my first time making a video.
car is a 96 civic Si (canadian)
i built the setup, the intercooler core i had was too big so i ended up ghetto mounting a 2g dsm sidemount i had kicking around.

its half diy and half professionally built. heh.

 

i put my intercooler in the same place... it was more of a air-heater when i had it there. I had the same DSM SMIC also. still thats nice power on a mustang dyno

Nick

 

Nice numbers! I'm assuming stock internals? As long as that IC isn't permanent you look good to go.

 

HMT

 

i plan on swapping the intercooler out asap.
like i said the core i was building end tanks for was too big.
i'm a welder by trade so i dunno if it classifies as hmt really, other than the ghetto intercooler placement.

 

I guess ill be the first to ask: how much psi were u running??

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1boostedcivic &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I guess ill be the first to ask: how much psi were u running??</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Nice numbers man. I dont like the smic thought. Anyway cool cool.

 

on the dyno sheet why does it say 96 civic SI?

 

yup because i'm canadian. the 96-00 civic Si here is the same as the EX in the states.

that power was put down at 10psi

stock internals, so i didn't want to pop the motor by going any higher



Modified by cua0 at 7:05 PM 6/25/2005

 

thats cool learn something new every day. good numbers

 

Hrm, Tq numbers seem a little off.
Here is a good repository of Turbo D dynos to compare against:
http://turbod16.com/viewtopic.php?t=4140

-PHiZ

 

my torque numbers are low compared to those guys

not by much though.

 

what are you using for fuel management?

 

Hondata s200
p28 ecu.

 

was this tuned or un-tuned? i'm guessign un-tuned?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PHiZ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hrm, Tq numbers seem a little off.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i think that could be due to heat soak. considering it looks like a stock radiator, SMIC under the hood, and an equal length manifold thats unwraped, i bet those underhood temps are really really high. good to see you want to change that intercooler, i would also look into a dual core radiator, or a delsol vtec radiator to get alittle more volume of heat transfer. otherwise everything looks good, and great numbers. i made 184hp, and 154tq untuned, at 9lbs, with bad heat soak. tuned, it vented the hood, and got a bigger radiator, and the car felt 10x's faster.

 

that was after tuning. but we tuned it very conservatively because of the stock internals.
the d internals like to let go above 220, so i wanted to keep it around 200, i exceeded my goals, so i'm happy.
i also didn't push it into the redline too much, but as you can see from the graph the numbers were still climbing when i let off.

yeah, it was majorly heatsoaked, i was considering putting ice on top of the intercooler for the tuning but forgot to grab some on my way in.

 

sickness brent, FMIC and more fine tuning , go for 230-240 whp

 

from what i can tell the lower o2 is a wideband correct? how far downstream is that? plx told me they reccomend atleast 2 feet downstream for placing my wideband because of temp issues, have you had any probs with the wbo2 sensor/how long have you been running it?

 

What kind of turbo are you running?

 

second o2 is a wideband yes, its about 15 or 16" downstream. no problems yet. i couldn't really go any farther down without worrying about it.

the turbo is a T3/T04E .48A/R / 60 trim

 

When do you hit full boost with that turbo? Thats some high power on a mustang dyno.

 

That's some good power

Good job.

 

I had same ic in same spot.
I took it off. And it was faster haha.
Now I have it front mounted and way better.

BTW sweet setup.