Suspension & Brakes Theory, alignment, spring rates....

Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2005 | 08:32 AM
  #1  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit

Is one really better than the other? The bsq kit is 20 shipped where as the beaks kit is 65. I have a type r sway bar sitting in my garage ready for install. I plan on running this with gc's and koni yellows. I have read if you get to aggressive with your spring rates it can cause problems with the reinforcement kit. Any input??
Reply
Old May 29, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #2  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

Reply
Old May 29, 2005 | 07:01 PM
  #3  
Targa250R's Avatar
be professional
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 14,842
Likes: 13
From: Pittsburgh, PA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

Neither will necessarily prevent subframe tear-out, depending on your spring rates and your usage. I've seen a subframe tear with the Beaks kit before. Car was a '97 Civic hatch with an ITR rear bar, Beaks kit, and 250 lbs-in linear rate rear springs.
Reply
Old May 29, 2005 | 09:12 PM
  #4  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (Targa250R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Targa250R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Neither will necessarily prevent subframe tear-out, depending on your spring rates and your usage. I've seen a subframe tear with the Beaks kit before. Car was a '97 Civic hatch with an ITR rear bar, Beaks kit, and 250 lbs-in linear rate rear springs.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Is there any kit that will prevent sub frame tear-out or is it the chance you take?
Reply
Old May 30, 2005 | 04:00 AM
  #5  
tONE.steR's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
From: Where all the TRY HARDS STUNT all day, CA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tygsr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Is there any kit that will prevent sub frame tear-out or is it the chance you take?</TD></TR></TABLE>

asr kit..

Reply
Old May 30, 2005 | 06:38 AM
  #6  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (Vita-Soy)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Vita-Soy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

asr kit..

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nice. I'll do a search on where to buy.
Reply
Old May 30, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #7  
CaptivaBlue's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
From: White Trash Racing Representative
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

http://www.a-spec-racing.com
Reply
Old May 31, 2005 | 07:56 AM
  #8  
MrHeeltoe's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,429
Likes: 0
From: Mission Viejo, CA, USA
Default

I have been selling Beaks for about a year now with no issues....
Reply
Old May 31, 2005 | 08:01 AM
  #9  
be.twenty's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,231
Likes: 0
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (CaptivaBlue)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CaptivaBlue &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">http://www.a-spec-racing.com</TD></TR></TABLE>

they only have for EK... no DC2/4?
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #10  
BSQ's Avatar
BSQ
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, OH, USA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

I have been selling my BSQ Type-R rear swaybar mounting/reinforcement kits (aka. BSQ mounting kit) for over 6 years now and there has not been any problems (eg. subframe tearout/damage) reported. My mounting kit can be used with the 22mm and 23mm ITR rear swaybars. Also, guys have been using the ITR rear swaybar w/BSQ mounting kit with stock spring & shocks all the way up to full coilover race suspensions.

FWIW, the '96-'00 Civic subframe is very prone to subframe damage when using a larger rear swaybar. The reason why is because the sheetmetal where the swaybar mounts is very flexable. So for the '96-'00 Civic, I would recommend using something like the Comptech tie bar/swaybar combo or the ASR subframe reinforcement brace w/ITR rear swaybar. Both of these kits prevent flexing of the swaybar subframe mounting points.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 11:00 AM
  #11  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (BSQ)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BSQ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have been selling my BSQ Type-R rear swaybar mounting/reinforcement kits (aka. BSQ mounting kit) for over 6 years now and there has not been any problems (eg. subframe tearout/damage) reported. My mounting kit can be used with the 22mm and 23mm ITR rear swaybars. Also, guys have been using the ITR rear swaybar w/BSQ mounting kit with stock spring & shocks all the way up to full coilover race suspensions.

FWIW, the '96-'00 Civic subframe is very prone to subframe damage when using a larger rear swaybar. The reason why is because the sheetmetal where the swaybar mounts is very flexable. So for the '96-'00 Civic, I would recommend using something like the Comptech tie bar/swaybar combo or the ASR subframe reinforcement brace w/ITR rear swaybar. Both of these kits prevent flexing of the swaybar subframe mounting points.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Nice to hear from one of the manufactures! So is the dc2 subframe not as flexible as the civic? Funny I ordered one of these kits from youn in the past and I cant seem to find it anywhere..
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #12  
94eg!'s Avatar
#1 Super Guy
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,631
Likes: 191
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

On the EG/DC sub-frame the sway-bar mounting holes are located inboard the LCA mounting bolt holes. On the EK sub-frame the sway-bar mounts are on the outboard the LCA mounting bolts near the edge of the sub-frame. This happened because Honda decided to make the LCAs for the EK's longer, thus making the sub-frame shorter (narrower). All while keeping the sway-bar mounting points in the same location. The result was a SUPER weak structure for sway-bar mounting.

Pics snaked from Hybrid-Garage's archive...

EG/DC sub-frame:


EK sub-frame:
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 12:31 PM
  #13  
94eg!'s Avatar
#1 Super Guy
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,631
Likes: 191
From: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (shogun-dc2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by shogun-dc2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

they only have for EK... no DC2/4?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Their website says the EG version is available for some time now. I'de bet money that it will fit a DC2 chassis. Shoot them an e-mail and find out...
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #14  
BSQ's Avatar
BSQ
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 1,545
Likes: 0
From: Dublin, OH, USA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tygsr &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
So is the dc2 subframe not as flexible as the civic? </TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes. Exactly what 94eg! said. I agree 100%.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 06:48 PM
  #15  
tONE.steR's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
From: Where all the TRY HARDS STUNT all day, CA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (shogun-dc2)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by shogun-dc2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

they only have for EK... no DC2/4?</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 94eg! &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Their website says the EG version is available for some time now. I'de bet money that it will fit a DC2 chassis. Shoot them an e-mail and find out...</TD></TR></TABLE>

It does fit the dc2/4.. same subframe.

Also in the pic I posted shows "DC - EG" on the box.

And its pretty known that eg/dc parts are pretty much always 'swapable'


Modified by Vita-Soy at 8:14 PM 6/1/2005
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #16  
sfr4dr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 695
Likes: 0
From: Carnelian Bay, CA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (Vita-Soy)

Here my Beaks install if it helps you decide:

Link
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2005 | 09:06 PM
  #17  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (BSQ)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BSQ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Yes. Exactly what 94eg! said. I agree 100%.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thanks. I will be ordering from you soon..
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 08:46 AM
  #18  
l4zo's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, ca
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit

http://www.geocities.com/bretq....html
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 11:16 AM
  #19  
Vtecfool's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,301
Likes: 0
From: Rain City, Pacific Ocean
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (l4zo)

I have the beaks and i have absolutely no complaints. But i have never heard any complaints of the BSQ kit. It's all prefrence, both are great kits.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2005 | 12:16 PM
  #20  
Vitt1's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,612
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (Vtecfool)

I've had the BSQ kit for over 2 years on mainly a track car with springs above 450 lb and 23mm ITR sway bar. No problems yet.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #21  
tONE.steR's Avatar
* B A N N E D *
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
From: Where all the TRY HARDS STUNT all day, CA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (Vitt1)

I have a rare mugen reinforment kit for sale.. in the sig.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #22  
Cory Matthews's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 1
From: ca
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (Vita-Soy)

check my sig for picutures of the asr kit on. leave a comment.
Reply
Old Jun 10, 2005 | 04:15 PM
  #23  
mark_is_gay's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,838
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere South Of Earth
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (b20zej1)

where can i get the bsq kit, and one other questions what about the front sway bar? my friend gave me both sway bars that iam tryin to throw on my eh2 hb would i need a kit for the front as well? dont mean to thread jack just needed to clear somehting up
Reply
Old Jun 11, 2005 | 10:47 PM
  #24  
cxSHOE's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,203
Likes: 2
From: ROLLING PARANOID WITH A SMILE, ca, USA
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (tygsr)

bsq kit on 92-95 civic hatch. never a problem with 22mm, 23mm itr rear sway with oem civic shocks, with tein ss, and with itr lca's with flex system. total time used with bsq about 2 years. never a problem.

ive only heard the sub frames ripping out on the ek's or maybe improper installation.
Reply
Old Jun 12, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #25  
tygsr's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,810
Likes: 0
From: woods cross, ut, usa
Default Re: Beaks vs. BSQ reinforcement kit (b20zej1)

Ordered the bsq. Very fast shipping!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:42 AM.