210 WHP 1.8-Lots of graphs inside (I feel like Tbone)
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Got to tune the caR at R&D Dyno in Gardena; let me just say that Darren is very cool.
Darren agreed to let me tune the car, he was just going to make the runs. He ended up doing much more tuning than I had planned
Some of you are familiar with the motor, but I will run it down anyway:
Block-sleeved ITR. Stock crank.
IB Wiseco 81.5mm 11:1 pistons.
Stock ITR head.
Something a little different here-Skunk2 Stage2 intake cam, but a Toda C exhaust cam.
Hytech header-Mugen cat back (new for me)
Various intakes tested (thanks again, Darren
)
Two throttle bodies tested-RPM 74mm and RPM 70-66mm.
Custom JG sheet metal intake manifold.
RC 440 cc injectors.
Hondata.
Darren gave me a floppy with all of my runs and suggested that I download the WinPep software to view and print them. I did and gotta say I am loving it
First graph is a comparison between the way I received the car in July 2003 (stock with a JDM 4-1 header and an AEM CAI), and after it was tuned today:

The second chart is a comparison of the throttle bodies; I was surprised by this one. I expected there to be more of a difference between them, but they were pretty close:

Next up is another test that surprised me a little, Shawn's "Magic" velocity stack style intake vs an AEM CAI cut off to be a short ram. The short ram actually beat the "Magic" intake between 6-7,000 rpm, and was close at the peak:
I brought the car in untuned, with a base map that was kind of close from when I was running an AEBS intake manifold and Toda C's. I had been running the cam gears at +3,-1, but had them at 0,0 for the base test. Car was quite a bit slower on the drive to the dyno, so I knew that the power was down.

Final test was a mini intake test; we had already tested the"magic" intake vs the short ram. Here we tested the J's Racing against the AEM CAI (full length) and against the short ram. The short ram was actually the clear winner on this motor-disclaimer: your results may vary

Modified by b19coupe at 7:40 AM 5/14/2005
Darren agreed to let me tune the car, he was just going to make the runs. He ended up doing much more tuning than I had planned
Some of you are familiar with the motor, but I will run it down anyway:Block-sleeved ITR. Stock crank.
IB Wiseco 81.5mm 11:1 pistons.
Stock ITR head.
Something a little different here-Skunk2 Stage2 intake cam, but a Toda C exhaust cam.
Hytech header-Mugen cat back (new for me)
Various intakes tested (thanks again, Darren
)Two throttle bodies tested-RPM 74mm and RPM 70-66mm.
Custom JG sheet metal intake manifold.
RC 440 cc injectors.
Hondata.
Darren gave me a floppy with all of my runs and suggested that I download the WinPep software to view and print them. I did and gotta say I am loving it
First graph is a comparison between the way I received the car in July 2003 (stock with a JDM 4-1 header and an AEM CAI), and after it was tuned today:

The second chart is a comparison of the throttle bodies; I was surprised by this one. I expected there to be more of a difference between them, but they were pretty close:

Next up is another test that surprised me a little, Shawn's "Magic" velocity stack style intake vs an AEM CAI cut off to be a short ram. The short ram actually beat the "Magic" intake between 6-7,000 rpm, and was close at the peak:
I brought the car in untuned, with a base map that was kind of close from when I was running an AEBS intake manifold and Toda C's. I had been running the cam gears at +3,-1, but had them at 0,0 for the base test. Car was quite a bit slower on the drive to the dyno, so I knew that the power was down.

Final test was a mini intake test; we had already tested the"magic" intake vs the short ram. Here we tested the J's Racing against the AEM CAI (full length) and against the short ram. The short ram was actually the clear winner on this motor-disclaimer: your results may vary

Modified by b19coupe at 7:40 AM 5/14/2005
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Dominican_Kid »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good numbers.
What kind of filter did you use on the short ram?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah what kind of filters were used
What kind of filter did you use on the short ram?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah what kind of filters were used
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
From: land of the sheep, home of the hypocrite
Good info. Thanks for posting it for us!
Also, was this with a GSR intake manifold? I'm wondering if the little bump in torque before VTEC can be attributed to the intake butterflies in the GSR manifold.
Also, was this with a GSR intake manifold? I'm wondering if the little bump in torque before VTEC can be attributed to the intake butterflies in the GSR manifold.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
The air filter on the short ram and the AEM was the one that came with the AEM. No filter on the magic intake, and the J's used the filter that came with it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by flyrod »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good info. Thanks for posting it for us!
Also, was this with a GSR intake manifold? I'm wondering if the little bump in torque before VTEC can be attributed to the intake butterflies in the GSR manifold.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> JG sheet metal intake manifold </TD></TR></TABLE>
There is an intake resonance at about 4,500 with the AEM CAI, and at 5,000 with the magic intake.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by flyrod »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Good info. Thanks for posting it for us!
Also, was this with a GSR intake manifold? I'm wondering if the little bump in torque before VTEC can be attributed to the intake butterflies in the GSR manifold.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> JG sheet metal intake manifold </TD></TR></TABLE>
There is an intake resonance at about 4,500 with the AEM CAI, and at 5,000 with the magic intake.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kndaqikEG »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Any particular reason behind the mismatched cams? </TD></TR></TABLE>
I have heard from a couple of people that these cams work well together. I had a set of each, so I gave it a shot.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by skunked »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What happen to the ITB's you had on there?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Still have them; may try them again on other motors or on this one at some point in the future. I really need an EMS to get the most out of them.
I have heard from a couple of people that these cams work well together. I had a set of each, so I gave it a shot.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by skunked »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What happen to the ITB's you had on there?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Still have them; may try them again on other motors or on this one at some point in the future. I really need an EMS to get the most out of them.
What other cams have you tested on this same motor setup? I saw that you said that you used to use both Toda C cams. Could you give us an overview of the different cams you have used and their powerbands?
Nice numbers and thanks for the good info.
Nice numbers and thanks for the good info.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
Here is the motor on ITB's and Toda C's. Hookup's dyno reads about 8-10 whp less than R&D's. Fuel pressure at 58 psi.

Last year stock block and head with Skunk Stage 2's, Comptech header, AEBS IM:
Last year stock block and head with Skunk Stage 2's, Comptech header, AEBS IM:
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,854
Likes: 4
From: Southern California, U.S.A.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tbone »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Pretty soon the 1.8's will be making more then me...Time to rebuild
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yup, we are gunning for your title
Next up is a CNC'd head for (hopefully) 10 more WHP.
Goal for the motor is 220-not too many 1.8's making 220
</TD></TR></TABLE>Yup, we are gunning for your title
Next up is a CNC'd head for (hopefully) 10 more WHP.
Goal for the motor is 220-not too many 1.8's making 220
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b19coupe »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yup, we are gunning for your title
Next up is a CNC'd head for (hopefully) 10 more WHP.
Goal for the motor is 220-not too many 1.8's making 220
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nope, but I do remember a few from here on ht..
Tony the tiger
JDMDOHCSIR(dave)
Dennis the cop
Cheetah?
I have a plan that I hope will get me to 270 whp
Yup, we are gunning for your title
Next up is a CNC'd head for (hopefully) 10 more WHP.
Goal for the motor is 220-not too many 1.8's making 220
</TD></TR></TABLE>Nope, but I do remember a few from here on ht..
Tony the tiger
JDMDOHCSIR(dave)
Dennis the cop
Cheetah?
I have a plan that I hope will get me to 270 whp



