gorpobr

B16 Stock Block Turbo @ 8.7psi (0.6bar) Dyno Cams Test - S2S2 no Intercooler x B16 no Intercooler x B16 with big Intercooler

Skunk2 Stage2 Turbo no IC- 103 - 200.9whp/188Nm
B16 cams Turbo no IC - 126 - 242.6whp/222.6Nm
B16 cams Turbo with IC - 138 - 248whp/243.9Nm

http://img132.imageshack.us/my...4.jpg

I did some videos last week with the Intercooler installed:

0-240kmh - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FGAVOs-xrlQ
0-220kmh - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ZXqOGNxC1Y

Best times by Gtech RR in this pull:
0-100kmh-5.385s
200mts-8.97s@138,34kmh
400mts-13.51s@175,75kmh

Setup:
Civic VTi EG6 95 B16a @ 8.7psi
GT2871R with T25 .82 exhaust
11:1 CR Stock Block Milled Head
Custom Made Manifold with 3'' exhaust
ETD Intercooler kit 29x11x3
AEBS Intake Manifold
HKS EVC IV Boost Controler
B16 OEM cams with skunk2 springs and retainers

What do you guys think about these results?


Modified by gorpobr at 9:14 AM 11/15/2007

tannerLSt

i'd like to know how the hell a b16 is making that much torque ...

and b16 cams made more power than skunk2 cams... what the hell

JdmJavi

First off the torque is being measured in Nm, not Lb ft., which would result in lower numbers when converted and secondly the Skunk cams are way too much cam for low boost turbo setups.

*Boostwerks*

I'd hardly call that a "cam test"

gorpobr

There is a lot of people that has a car wih NA cams and wish to turbocharger and see what is the results and there are other asking if they really need an intercooler with low boost, with afraid to have more turbo lag.

All the dynos are tuuned with 12:1 AFR

So for my car, I saw that the Skunk2 Stage2 are much cams for my setup and saw that the Intercooler gave me good tq gains in mid range and top end, without loosing anything in low end.

In the future maybe I will do another test with CTR/ITR cams and this same setup.