my 07 civic si sedan on the dyno @ charleston meet 10/27



this is my friends s2k


the silly thing was the s2k pulled only @ 195 whp with a toda exhaust, and aem v2 intake.?? the owner assured us that these readings were accurate and not to get our hopes up that the whips were making more than what the machine put down. hmmmmm.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SIVIC 3 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well, it made 188 whp with a k&n drop-in filter and an hks axle-back. was wondering after the fact if they should of had the vsa off while dynoing? cause i know it was on, think that could of made a difference?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The car wouldn't make a pull with the VSA on. We had to turn it off.
We ran my bone stock 07 Si a couple cars before you ran it put down similar numbers.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The car wouldn't make a pull with the VSA on. We had to turn it off.
We ran my bone stock 07 Si a couple cars before you ran it put down similar numbers.
i went to HIN a few months ago down in long island and i saw a s2k put down similar numbers. I was really disappointed and i knew my SI has similar number. My buddy has a superchargered s2k, and he told me that those numbers were right due to the fact that its rear wheel drive and it loses about 40% of its power from the drivetrain, axle, and other things. So.... it would be nice to see a stock si vs. stock s2k.
Trending Topics
do you realize what you just said? you actually believed that 40%, let me repeat, FOURTY PERCENT, of a s2000's power is loss through the drivetrain? come on now...
AP1 with a F20C- 240bhp - 40% loss = 144hp
AP2 with a F22C- 237bhp - 40% loss = 142.2hp
your buddy seems to be a smart guy.
AP1 with a F20C- 240bhp - 40% loss = 144hp
AP2 with a F22C- 237bhp - 40% loss = 142.2hp
your buddy seems to be a smart guy.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clemsonhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The car wouldn't make a pull with the VSA on. We had to turn it off.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont understand... How would VSA effect anything unless you were loosing traction?
The car wouldn't make a pull with the VSA on. We had to turn it off.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont understand... How would VSA effect anything unless you were loosing traction?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by civic1234 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I dont understand... How would VSA effect anything unless you were loosing traction? </TD></TR></TABLE>
When the back wheels are not moving and the front are it won't rev over 2K rpm.
VSA is more that just traction control, it uses the brakes to help recover from understeer/oversteer situations.
I dont understand... How would VSA effect anything unless you were loosing traction? </TD></TR></TABLE>
When the back wheels are not moving and the front are it won't rev over 2K rpm.
VSA is more that just traction control, it uses the brakes to help recover from understeer/oversteer situations.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmitr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">uh... as far as the VSA is concerned, on a dyno it "thinks" that you ARE loosing traction!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
So loose it may fall off?
</TD></TR></TABLE>So loose it may fall off?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Curiouz_G »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">do you realize what you just said? you actually believed that 40%, let me repeat, FOURTY PERCENT, of a s2000's power is loss through the drivetrain? come on now...
AP1 with a F20C- 240bhp - 40% loss = 144hp
AP2 with a F22C- 237bhp - 40% loss = 142.2hp
your buddy seems to be a smart guy. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I was thinking the same thing. I don't think any modern automobile has such an inefficient drivetrain. Automatic cars w/ AWD don't even lose 30%...
AP1 with a F20C- 240bhp - 40% loss = 144hp
AP2 with a F22C- 237bhp - 40% loss = 142.2hp
your buddy seems to be a smart guy. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I was thinking the same thing. I don't think any modern automobile has such an inefficient drivetrain. Automatic cars w/ AWD don't even lose 30%...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jdmitr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">uh... as far as the VSA is concerned, on a dyno it "thinks" that you ARE loosing traction!
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clemsonhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
When the back wheels are not moving and the front are it won't rev over 2K rpm.
VSA is more that just traction control, it uses the brakes to help recover from understeer/oversteer situations. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks guys! Never knew that, now i know
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clemsonhatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
When the back wheels are not moving and the front are it won't rev over 2K rpm.
VSA is more that just traction control, it uses the brakes to help recover from understeer/oversteer situations. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Thanks guys! Never knew that, now i know
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post






