All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 12:49 AM
  #1  
Black R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet?

I've noticed some local stations are starting to carry the stuff..... it's less expensive than regular unleaded, and I think I remember reading somewhere that it's like 105 octane rating compared to 93 'supreme' unleaded...

How does it perform?

You cali guys excited about it?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:14 AM
  #2  
mmuller's Avatar
Mad Scientist
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,827
Likes: 1
From: tallafizzy, FL state
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (Black R)

subscribed.

I have looked around and there are very few e85 stations on the south east; most of them military issue anyways. Maybe soon..
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 07:32 AM
  #3  
gents97civ's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: VA
Default

I know sheetz is going to add E85 to some of the new gas stations. Personally I dont think its worth the time or money unless you are converting a non daily driver.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 08:30 AM
  #4  
-Whitey-'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Default Re: (gents97civ)

E85 is about .20 cents cheaper a gallon and it gives 15-20% less MPG...ive run it in my subaru...it sounds crazy...sounds like a toned down top fuel car or somthing..its raspy but with an angry note..not a ricer note...i didnt notice much of a gain but the throttle response did increase and the car felt like a raped ape at highway speed

a few of the NA subaru guys have been messing with the stuff..some run straight E85 on stock motors with minimal fuel delivery mods...i added 10 gallons of E85 to 5 gallons of 93 octane.

i was gonna make a thread about this stuff to see if any of the honda people are experimenting with it yet..its at a ton of gas stations in illinois
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 08:33 AM
  #5  
-Whitey-'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Default Re: (-Whitey-)

heres a link for more info about someone who has used it, what they did to use it daily in thier car, and where to find E85 near you

http://www.gt-labs.net/e85conversion.html
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 09:52 AM
  #6  
Black R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: (-Whitey-)

Thanks for that link.

I found this thread, which is pretty much E85 101:

http://e85forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=44



I may just do a full tank of E85 and tune my allmotor car on the dyno - just to see how much more power it'll make.

I like the idea of a cleaner burning vehicle - even with a test pipe!

I see also that 13:1 static c/r on E85 is perfectly viable.

From the E85 forums:

Originally Posted by hotrod
Here is my 2c on this topic.

Converting engines to E85 raises some interesting questions. You actually have two different issues here. One is for a basic conversion by someone who only wants to make a conversion with largely existing equipment ( ie minimum investment in order to cut fuel costs, to get some of the benefits of a superior fuel or as a political/social statement regarding foreign oil independence or renewable fuel concerns) For those folks the conversion is really pretty simple.

If you are on the other hand looking at an "optimized conversion" where you are custom building a setup to get the most out of E85 --- than that is a whole different ball of worms.

For the "basic conversion" You only have a couple of issues to worry about.
1. Ignition timing changes are not necessary E85 and gasoline use almost identical ignition advance at both max power and max effeciency.
2. Fuel flow increase to adapt to the different fuel. In this case your most important concern is to increase fuel flow by about 27% give or take a bit so the engine is working with an ideal mixture.
3. Fuel system component compatibility ( modern rubber fuel lines are ethanol safe) Some fuel pumps, and gasket materials may have issues.

On modern OBDII electronic engine management systems, almost no changes of any kind are needed at fuel mixtures of 33% and below of E85. The modern ECU's have enough fuel trim authority to adapt to these mixtures. If the user is willing to live with some CEL's and a slight lean out under max power, you can push that up near 50% mixtures with no changes at all. For mixtures between 50% E85 and 100% E85 you need to increase the fuel system flow capacity by using larger injectors, increased fuel pressure etc.

On the EFI systems, if there is a user tuneable or (vendor tunable) ecu reflash or adjustable piggy back tuning solution, you can optimize the fuel mixture by using commonly understood tuning modifications.

Generally you richen the mixture about 27% across the board. At max power if performance is the goal you will want to run it even a bit richer as Ethanol based fuels continue to make more power at up to 25% rich of stoich mixture where gasoline reaches max power at about 15% rich of stoich. EDIT I have one source that says you can go up to 40% rich of stoich on E85 and still get increased torque. On carburator systems you may need to enlarge fuel inlet sizes and ensure the needle and seat material is compatable with ethanol fuels.

For max fuel economy the ethanol based fuels produce more torque at lower throttle openings and their higher fuel octane and cool burning characteristics will allow you to lean out the light throttle low load cruise portions of the fuel map father than you would dare on gasoline.

On an optomized carburator system, basically all the above applies but it is a bit more complicated to get there. For an average driver, only interested in getting the car to run well on the new fuel. Richen the primary jets about 27%, and the secondary jets a bit more. You will probably want to increase the accelerator pump shot and may need to modify the idle mixture sytem slightly to get good drivability. You may need more carburator heat, and or more agressive choke settings in cold weather.

Any tuner that is good with carburators should be able to dial in a setup with a bit of experimentation. There are a handful of shops that build custom carburators for racers that run methanol fuels and an E85 conversion carburator would be a pretty simple adaptation of their methanol carb design I would think. Call around and see who builds "alcohol carburators" for the racers and they should be able to get up to speed pretty quickly.

Once you get to trying to optimize the engine for a high ethanol fuel like E85, you would be making pretty much the same modification the methanol fuel class racers do to their engines with the exception that your fuel flow rates would be a bit lower. Due to the higher octane you would run a higher compression ratio ( up to 13:1 or so on NA engines).

Wet flow in the intake manifold of carburated systems is more critical due to the higher volume of fuel dropplets and strong charge air cooling of the alcohol fuels. Alcohol fueled engine tend to like heads and manifolds that have higher air flow capacity by about 10% ( actually ports shaped for slower mixture velocities but higher flow, bigger intake valves, more cam etc. ). The engine can make use of the higher volumetric effeciency where on gasoline it would have gone over the edge into detonation with the higher flow intake system. The increased torque and higher compression ratios, with the alcohol fuels largely gets rid of low speed drivability issues that the larger intake flow and more agressive cams would create on a gasoline engine. The Alcohol fueled engine may also prefer a larger header tube size for performance applications (ethanol produces more exhaust gas volume than gasoline does).

Fuel drop out is more of a concern for max power engines running alcohol fuels, as is keeping the mixture in suspension. Engines can run with slightly warmer thermostats to aid cold weather drivablility, and keep oil temp up high enough to keep from building up fuel in the oil due to the very rich mixtures racers run. Modern synthetic oils appear to work just fine with E85.

A smaller cooling system may be useable on the E85 setup than you could get away with on gasoline. In some cases you may want to intentionally lean the fuel mixture out a bit to get some heat in the engine. In carburated engines they my like more intake manifold heat in cold driving conditions.

Due to the lower exhaust gas temp, catalytic converters light off slower (or fail to light off) with alcohol fuels, so more attention should be made to keep heat in the exhaust system prior to the Cat.

Older vehicles (pre-1980's) may have some fuel system compatability issues with carburator floats, fuel hoses and seals. Cork based carburator gaskets have been known to cause problems on some cars as have Plastic foam carburator floats. Remove any magnesium or zinc in the fuel system, keep an eye on aluminum if it is constantly wetted by fuel and open to the air so it can absorb moisture ( ie carburator float bowls). Anodized aluminum is safe as is stainless steel, mild steel, nickle plated brass and bronze fuel fittings. Mixing many dissimilar metals in the same fuel system should be avoided. ( things like copper tubing, aluminum etc may set up electrolytic corrosion if in the same system. Much like underwater corrosion control in boats, highly reactive metals like Zinc and magnesium are to be avoided)

Some Plastic fuel tanks may have issues with E85, Older fuel tanks coated with "tern" metal ( a lead based coating) may slowly have the internal metal coating stripped off due to this sort of electorlytic action.


Quote:
What can a person do to convince a company like Holly or Edelbrock to make a 50-state legal conversion kit like they do for aftermarket performace products?


1). Get the EPA to quit publishing regs that prohibit changes out right, and set performance based standards.

2.) Create enough economic demand that it is profitable for them to jump through all the necessary hoops.

Hope that helps.

Larry

oh yeah, here's the wikipedia entry for E85:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E85

.....and from wikipedia:

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Power output and usage in Racing

E85 has been repeatedly shown to produce more power than a comparable gasoline fuel, especially in engines that need high octane fuels to avoid detonation.[12] Ford Motor Company found that power typically increased approximately 5% with the switch to E85 [13]. Researchers working on the equivalent of E85 fuel for general aviation aircraft AGE-85 have seen the same results with an aircraft engine jumping from 600 hp on conventional 100LL av gas to 650 hp on the AGE-85. Recorded power increases range from 5% - 9% depending on the engine. [14][15]

Due to pressure to remove leaded fuel even from racing environments, several racing organizations are looking at ethanol or E85 fuels as suitable alternative fuels for high performance race engines.

In 2006, the "National Street Car Association" is adopting E85 as an approved fuel for both their American Muscle Car and Street Machine eliminator racing classes.

The National Hot Rod Association (NHRA) currently allows ethanol as an approved fuel in several of its racing classes. NHRA approved ethanol is allowed in their bracket classes, Hotrod, Modified, ProFWD, and ProRWD classes to name some of the more popular. At this time NHRA has not announced any plans to include E85 as an approved fuel in the classes that are currently limited to "pump fuels".

The Indy Racing League is likewise moving to ethanol based fuels in 2006, with 10% ethanol 90% methanol fuel blend, and switching to a 100% ethanol fuel in the 2007 racing season.

There is much discussion of NASCAR also making the switch to an ethanol based fuel in the future. During selected 2006 Craftsman Truck Series races, the Chevrolet Silverado pace truck, such as the one in the GM Flex-Fuel 250, will be fueled by E85, and a marketing campaign with Morgan-Dollar Motorsports resulted in one of their trucks' numbers changed to #85 to promote E85 fuel such as the one used in the pace truck.

In 2006, Shell announced V8 Supercar will use Shell Optimax Extreme, a premium unleaded fuel blended with five percent ethanol.

Interest in E85 is high enough that there are now competitions for engine builders to develop winning combinations for both power and fuel economy on this fuel. One such competition is sponsored by the AERA Engine Builders Association. [16].</TD></TR></TABLE>


Modified by Black R at 2:19 PM 7/24/2006
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 10:26 AM
  #7  
Black R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default

basically, on a typical 1988+ na motor running 240cc injectors, I suspect that simply adding 290cc or 310cc injectors would be sufficient to accommodate the additional fueling that running full E85 would require.

(+~27%)

We may also need something simple like a E85 tune with a vafc or burn a new rom for those of us with crome/ uberdata/ hondata/ etc. (of course, this would be ideal, however it appears that 20%-30% E85 is perfectly safe for your daily driver as is, with no ill effects.

The biggest hurdle I see is that stoich for E85 is somewhere in the 9:1 a/f ratio, which is still 1 lambda. BUT many of the current wideband o2 sensors may not have sufficient range to tune effectively for the DIYers out there...
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #8  
bluemax189's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (Black R)

all of a sudden i see this e85 becoming more and more popular. curious if you have to convert anything on your car to run it?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 10:37 AM
  #9  
-Whitey-'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,023
Likes: 0
Default Re: (bluemax189)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bluemax189 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">all of a sudden i see this e85 becoming more and more popular. curious if you have to convert anything on your car to run it?</TD></TR></TABLE>

did you read this thread at all or just the title?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 10:49 AM
  #10  
ShaunRR's Avatar
HT White Ops
20 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 33
From: Rochester, MN, US
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (Black R)

LOL, I just searched HT for threads on this a couple days ago. Apparently, there are a few people on here that have already tuned their cars to run on it. In the main thread I found, they talked about a Mustang that made over 1000hp on it.

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1611704
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 02:06 PM
  #11  
lohatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 1
From: the backwoods, usa
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (rochesterricer)

i'm running E85 in my 2.0L. 13.7:1 static compression. pops 275psi cranking compression(bled some pressure off with cam timing). doesnt knock and have gone 12.5x at 109.97. running walbro 255 pump and some 43lb injectors but i'm going to swap in some 60lb injectors because i am running those 43's at a pretty high duty cycle. running crome pro and makes good power with 11:1ish AFRs.. leaned out(15:1-16:1) on the hwy i get around 26-27mpg with twm itbs.
everything else is my fuel system is stock besides the pump and the injectors.

couple things i have picked up on while running it...
-the 9:1 afr thing doesnt seem to hold true on my engine. give your engine what it wants. we arent running smallblock chevys.
-just because it has less BTU's doesnt mean you cant lean it out while cruising and retain good mileage. you dont need a lot of power at partial throttle when you are up to speed.
-there arent too many other fuels out there that can support that kind of cylinder pressure and be purchased at he pump for $2.60/gallon. however E85 might be hard to find in your area.
-if you are going to build an aggressive setup that calls for a larger injector then why not buy a little larger one and run a fuel can handle it instead of detuning your engine so it doesnt knock like hell on 91.92.93....whatever you can get local
- if you are building something aggressive you are going to tune it anyways. not that hard to manipulate the fuel/timing maps for the E85 fuel.
i am in minnesota and there are over 200 stations carrying it in the state. hopefully your state has a couple within reasonable distance to you.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 04:02 PM
  #12  
The Destroyer's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,131
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (lohatch)

There was a very informative in the FI section not to long ago. Might be the link from rochesterricer, but im to lazy to verify.

Some people where making decent power on E85. Wish my area of FL had it, id love to give it a try.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 09:22 PM
  #13  
vivid 02's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,517
Likes: 0
From: DR. 90210, CA, Breast Man
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (Vtaaak y0)

I just checked california and there are only about 5 stations and none near me. Sucks.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2006 | 10:21 PM
  #14  
B20C5 Turbo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Ut
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (Black R)

I tuned my high CR engine with it, then the price went out of sight here (more expensive than premium). So I purchased some straight Ethanol and retuned ($2.00/gal). It makes better power, and I love the smell.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #15  
Black R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (B20C5 Turbo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B20C5 Turbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I tuned my high CR engine with it, then the price went out of sight here (more expensive than premium). So I purchased some straight Ethanol and retuned ($2.00/gal). It makes better power, and I love the smell. </TD></TR></TABLE>


E100?

Where did you purchase it?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:46 AM
  #16  
hu's Avatar
hu
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 1
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (Black R)

I do not like it because I do not see E85 as a viable alternative.

It takes more resources to produce E85 than it is worth. See nrri.org at the Ohio State University. It is the National Regulatory Research Institute.

True, it burns clean but you use 15% fuel economy. No thanks.

We need real alternatives to oil. Just my .02
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #17  
Black R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (hu)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I do not like it because I do not see E85 as a viable alternative.

It takes more resources to produce E85 than it is worth. See nrri.org at the Ohio State University. It is the National Regulatory Research Institute.

True, it burns clean but you use 15% fuel economy. No thanks.

We need real alternatives to oil. Just my .02</TD></TR></TABLE>


Well, that is your opinion and you are entitled to it.

I DO see it as a viable alternative - it is ~$2 per gallon (105oct) here as opposed to $3.20/gal for 93oct. Even burning more, the emissions are LESS, the mileage is a little less, but the cost is a LOT less. Not to mention, the streetability of 14:1 static c/r, and higher power production for a street car.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:58 AM
  #18  
ShaunRR's Avatar
HT White Ops
20 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 33
From: Rochester, MN, US
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (hu)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I do not like it because I do not see E85 as a viable alternative.

It takes more resources to produce E85 than it is worth. See nrri.org at the Ohio State University. It is the National Regulatory Research Institute.

True, it burns clean but you use 15% fuel economy. No thanks.

We need real alternatives to oil. Just my .02</TD></TR></TABLE>

Getting it from corn isn't very efficient, but there are fairly new methods of getting ethanol from cellulose which are HUGELY efficient. The best place to get this is from sagegrass, which is very easy to grow.

Besides, the extra stability it would introduce into the economy, due to the relative immunity from the changes in oil prices, make it well worth it IMO. Not to mention the strategic advantages.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #19  
B20C5 Turbo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Ut
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (Black R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Black R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">E100? Where did you purchase it?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Technically it isn't 100%; they have to make it "un-drinkable" then add an upper end lubricant to call it 'fuel'. We have a local distributor that sells it in 55gal drums.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 08:49 PM
  #20  
Black R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (B20C5 Turbo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B20C5 Turbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Technically it isn't 100%; they have to make it "un-drinkable" then add an upper end lubricant to call it 'fuel'. We have a local distributor that sells it in 55gal drums.</TD></TR></TABLE>


mmmmm! $110 per drum!
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:18 PM
  #21  
B20C5 Turbo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Ut
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (hu)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I do not like it because I do not see E85 as a viable alternative... We need real alternatives to oil. Just my .02</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't understand how you can say that. The way I see it, Ethanol is leading the race to an alternative for oil in terms of transportable liquid fuel for automobiles. It's completely renewable, produces fewer emissions, and can 'take root' in your own backyard.

Try to grow an oil field or clump of shale in your garden. You probably won't have much luck with that, but it's quite possible that scientists will engineer strains of bacteria (yeast) that can turn your grass clippings or the leaves that fall from your trees into Ethanol (or something else that's useful). That would be better than throwing them in a trash bin that's headed to the landfill.

Even from a purely economic standpoint, the fact that a gallon of Ethanol (fuel) sells for less than 1/2 the price of gasolines with the same knock index indicates that it's much cheaper to produce, and lacks the political bullshit surrounding the Worlds oil supply (I hate politicians).

I look at the "un-recycleable" things I throw in the trash every day and wonder what else we could have done with it if we didn't have oil to depend on.

I suspect that you had another [real] alternative to oil in mind when you made your post, I'd like to hear what it is.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 09:39 PM
  #22  
hu's Avatar
hu
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 4,410
Likes: 1
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (B20C5 Turbo)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B20C5 Turbo &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I don't understand how you can say that. The way I see it, Ethanol is leading the race to an alternative for oil in terms of transportable liquid fuel for automobiles. It's completely renewable, produces fewer emissions, and can 'take root' in your own backyard.

Try to grow an oil field or clump of shale in your garden. You probably won't have much luck with that, but it's quite possible that scientists will engineer strains of bacteria (yeast) that can turn your grass clippings or the leaves that fall from your trees into Ethanol (or something else that's useful). That would be better than throwing them in a trash bin that's headed to the landfill.

Even from a purely economic standpoint, the fact that a gallon of Ethanol (fuel) sells for less than 1/2 the price of gasolines with the same knock index indicates that it's much cheaper to produce, and lacks the political bullshit surrounding the Worlds oil supply (I hate politicians).

I look at the "un-recycleable" things I throw in the trash every day and wonder what else we could have done with it if we didn't have oil to depend on.

I suspect that you had another [real] alternative to oil in mind when you made your post, I'd like to hear what it is.</TD></TR></TABLE>

You cannot use ethanol to build highways. Oil products are in so many things that you wouldnt believe it. Everybody equates oil with gasoline and motor oil. There are far more uses than that.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #23  
ShaunRR's Avatar
HT White Ops
20 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 13,063
Likes: 33
From: Rochester, MN, US
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (hu)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You cannot use ethanol to build highways. Oil products are in so many things that you wouldnt believe it. Everybody equates oil with gasoline and motor oil. There are far more uses than that. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes, but gasoline is BY FAR the largest use of petroleum.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #24  
B20C5 Turbo's Avatar
New User
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: SLC, Ut
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (hu)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hu &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Oil products are in so many things that you wouldnt believe it. Everybody equates oil with gasoline and motor oil. There are far more uses than that. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Touche... I realize that the Worlds dependance on crude oil extends far beyond the demands of gasoline and motor oil, and that WE (yeah, you and I) have to search beyond Ethanol for a complete alternative to oil. All I'm saying is that we need to start somewhere; and Ethanol will relieve the demand on the Worlds oil reserves for gasoline as a fuel. That will allow US (yeah, you and I) to concentrate on alternatives to the lubrication and plastizication (if that is a word) of the World.

I've taken that step. Have you?

I STILL suspect that you had another [real] alternative to oil in mind when you made your post, and I'd STILL like to hear what it is.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 03:09 PM
  #25  
slofu's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: medium pimpin
Default Re: for discussion: anybody done an E85 conversion and tune yet? (B20C5 Turbo)

the best alternative (which i can fathom) to oil for fuel would be electricity generated from nuclear power plants. sure, the waste is toxic, but there's relatively little of it, and it can be disposed of safely and efficiently.

many think of the Chernobyl or 3 Mile Island disasters, yet they fail to see many countries successfully using American-developed reactors (beloved France, for one) for decades without incident. they are relatively cheap and easy to maintain, and far more efficient than our current fuels (coal, natural gas, oil, etc.). as long as the waste is safely managed, nuclear power is far more environmentally friendly even than wind power (wind farms are noisy, and consume much land, however barren).

cell/battery tech will need to be developed much further, but when the former head of Exxon/Mobil declares publicly (on Charlie Rose, at least) that oil/energy companies should be working toward nuclear power, you can't help but more seriously consider it.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:48 PM.