Wheel and Tire

Which tires are better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 2, 2007 | 07:01 AM
  #1  
trapper2933's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default Which tires are better?

PLEASE HELP!!!!
Im putting 16" Motegi's on my accord....

which tires are better for me to get for the price...

im looking at either:
Yokohama AVS ES100= 205/55ZR-16 90W BSW..... For $83 a tire (total: $389.00)

OR

Falken GR Beta FK-451= 205/50ZR-16 87Y B..... For $71 a tire (total: $336.00)

im 18 and MoNeY is definately a factor, so which is the better deal???
PLEASE HELP!!!!!
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 08:10 AM
  #2  
nsxtasy's Avatar
H-T Order of Merit
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 23,478
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default Re: Which tires are better? (trapper2933)

First decide on the size, then decide on the best tire.

Is your '95 Accord LX a four-cylinder, or does it have the V6? If it has the four, it came with 185/70-14 stock tires and you need size 205/50-16. If it has the six, it came with 195/65-15 stock tires and you need size 205/55-16.

In either case, there are other tires I would get over either of the two you mention. (Also, the Falken FK-451 is being discontinued and replaced by the newer Falken FK-452. But I would still buy something else.)

In particular, I would get the Avon Tech M500 (at the Tire Rack, prices are $81 for 205/50-16, $77 for 205/55-16) or the Kumho Ecsta SPT ($81 for 205/50-16, $69 for 205/55-16). Both are better than the ES100 or the Falken. The Avon is a bit better than the Kumho.

Also, shop around. For example, the Kumho SPT in 205/50-16 is $81 plus shipping at the Tire Rack, but it's $79 with free shipping at Discount Tire, which means your total there on a set of four will be lower by $50-60.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 08:57 AM
  #3  
trapper2933's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default Re: Which tires are better? (nsxtasy)

yea my car is a 4 cylinder... why would the aspect ratio matter on the tires depending on what size engine i have?
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 09:50 AM
  #4  
chrisw85's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,829
Likes: 1
From: Norcal
Default

I was going to go with the SPT's for my car, but tirerack was backordered indefinately on them (in a 205/50/15).
I ended up going with the yoko ES100. They've been great for me so far.

I've heard that the sidewall on the Kumho SPT flexes more than the ES100, leading to a slightly less crisp turn in response. Looking at the Tire Rack tests, the ES100, M500 and the SPT are pretty close overall.

The next tire i want to try is the Avon M500, either that or the Hankook R-S2 (the hankooks b/c they're availible in 225/45/15).

To the OP, for the tires you listed, I'd def choose the ES100 over the falkens. But i'd choose the Avon M500 over the ES100. Get the right tire size, 205.50.16 so your effective gearing won't be off.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 10:09 AM
  #5  
nsxtasy's Avatar
H-T Order of Merit
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 23,478
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Default Re: Which tires are better? (trapper2933)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by trapper2933 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea my car is a 4 cylinder... why would the aspect ratio matter on the tires depending on what size engine i have?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Because the cars had different size tires depending on which engine they. And you want to get tires whose outer diameter is as close as possible to that of the stock tires.

Incidentally, I see that in 205/50-16, the Yokohama ES100 is $5 cheaper than the SPT at Discount Tire ($74 vs $79). Even though the SPT is slightly better (mostly in rain), the difference isn't huge, so don't be afraid to get the ES100 and save the $20. That means the ES100 is $296 for four, with free shipping.
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
KCustoms's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
From: sacramento, ca, usa
Default Re: Which tires are better? (trapper2933)

I would go with the falken...
Reply
Old May 2, 2007 | 07:07 PM
  #7  
DaveSi677's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,117
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada but from Montreal
Default Re: Which tires are better? (KCustoms)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KCustoms &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would go with the falken...</TD></TR></TABLE>

Horrible advice! I would go with the SPT or the Avon Tech M500.
Reply
Old May 7, 2007 | 06:23 AM
  #8  
trapper2933's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC, USA
Default

thanks for all your help guys!!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
loki2323
Wheel and Tire
2
Nov 1, 2011 05:09 AM
Torontodude
Wheel and Tire
1
Feb 11, 2008 10:11 AM
1accord
Wheel and Tire
2
Jan 5, 2007 02:49 PM
No-Gi
Wheel and Tire
6
Oct 2, 2006 12:10 PM
hanskies
Acura Integra
20
Jul 28, 2006 08:44 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 PM.