B16B with AN-R header dyno
I've seen a stock RSX Type S dynoed and it made around 170 at the wheels on a dynojet also.
Looks like it actually made more power here on Importbuilders dyno, which is a dynojet I believe.
http://www.importreview.com/d_2.0.html
Looks like it actually made more power here on Importbuilders dyno, which is a dynojet I believe.
http://www.importreview.com/d_2.0.html
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RyanR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I've seen a stock RSX Type S dynoed and it made around 170 at the wheels on a dynojet also.
Looks like it actually made more power here on Importbuilders dyno, which is a dynojet I believe.
http://www.importreview.com/d_2.0.html </TD></TR></TABLE>
With an injen intake. I dunno if you're familiar with the rsx, but intakes add around 10+whp for those puppies.
I may be wrong and i'm willing to accept that. But shawn told me himself that dynojet readings would be lower than dynapack. Nevertheless, impressive numbers for the b16b even if it were in the mid 170s. It'd still be impressive for that 1.6 liter.
Looks like it actually made more power here on Importbuilders dyno, which is a dynojet I believe.
http://www.importreview.com/d_2.0.html </TD></TR></TABLE>
With an injen intake. I dunno if you're familiar with the rsx, but intakes add around 10+whp for those puppies.
I may be wrong and i'm willing to accept that. But shawn told me himself that dynojet readings would be lower than dynapack. Nevertheless, impressive numbers for the b16b even if it were in the mid 170s. It'd still be impressive for that 1.6 liter.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by StinkyTofu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">[QUOTE=Chris1.6]
no.[/QUOTE
Instead of just saying no, how about backing up your answer with an explanation? </TD></TR></TABLE>
hmmm. no.
no.[/QUOTE
Instead of just saying no, how about backing up your answer with an explanation? </TD></TR></TABLE>
hmmm. no.
you guys do realize that this is a B16B
It is very different from a B16A. It is actually a B18C block that has been destroked to 1.6l and if I am not mistaken, makes 180 crank HP stock in the CTR that it comes in.
It is very different from a B16A. It is actually a B18C block that has been destroked to 1.6l and if I am not mistaken, makes 180 crank HP stock in the CTR that it comes in.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tonyXcom »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you guys do realize that this is a B16B
It is very different from a B16A. It is actually a B18C block that has been destroked to 1.6l and if I am not mistaken, makes 180 crank HP stock in the CTR that it comes in.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so true. cool avatar btw.
It is very different from a B16A. It is actually a B18C block that has been destroked to 1.6l and if I am not mistaken, makes 180 crank HP stock in the CTR that it comes in.</TD></TR></TABLE>
so true. cool avatar btw.
Everyone needs to read the new article i believe in the new turbo mag or sportcompact car it has a comparison of dyno's as long as the use same dyno to compare numbers baseline and w/ the upgrade than there would be a ligit increase but just posting one dyno figure doesnt give everyone the full idea of what power potential of the product.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by StinkyTofu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes I know, but at the same time you are taking off a substantial amount of rotational weight that the car must spin on a normal dynojet. Dyno your car on a dynojet and i bet it will be lower.
Wouldn't it be logical to think that the car would make MORE hp with the wheels off the car? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes.
Wouldn't it be logical to think that the car would make MORE hp with the wheels off the car? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris1.6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The only thing we know is that his B16B motor made 184.1 whp and 123.9 lbs ft torque.</TD></TR></TABLE>
its a dynapack, = more power/tq than a Dynojet.
I saw a stock B16b with a JG header and stock GSR ecu on a Dynojet = 164/105. No tuning
Greg
The only thing we know is that his B16B motor made 184.1 whp and 123.9 lbs ft torque.</TD></TR></TABLE>
its a dynapack, = more power/tq than a Dynojet.
I saw a stock B16b with a JG header and stock GSR ecu on a Dynojet = 164/105. No tuning
Greg
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tonyXcom »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you guys do realize that this is a B16B
It is very different from a B16A. It is actually a B18C block that has been destroked to 1.6l and if I am not mistaken, makes 180 crank HP stock in the CTR that it comes in.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah i was about to say that too...it also has a higher compression! And CTR cams (considering that its a CTR motor!
)!
It is very different from a B16A. It is actually a B18C block that has been destroked to 1.6l and if I am not mistaken, makes 180 crank HP stock in the CTR that it comes in.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah i was about to say that too...it also has a higher compression! And CTR cams (considering that its a CTR motor!
)!
One question, which header would produce better results the standard or compact? check http://www.an-r.com/headers/b-series.html to see them. I think the compact one would look sweet.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
integlspwr2k
Honda S2000
19
Sep 21, 2009 10:21 AM
jdmspoonitr
Acura Integra Type-R
37
Jun 22, 2006 12:39 PM
carboy_honda
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
10
Jun 12, 2005 05:59 AM




