Dyno'ed, What do you think of the results?
Alright, got my dyno done today. Here are my mods:
Comptech Icebox
JDM 4-1
Carsound Cat.
V-AFC
Here is the dyno chart, what do you guys think (BE HONEST, none of this it's okay bullshit):
[Modified by onyx00, 11:57 AM 12/5/2001]
Comptech Icebox
JDM 4-1
Carsound Cat.
V-AFC
Here is the dyno chart, what do you guys think (BE HONEST, none of this it's okay bullshit):
[Modified by onyx00, 11:57 AM 12/5/2001]
Hey man that look spretty good
Are you running a stock exhuast? Powersteering?
What did Technodyne charge you? Did you check theA/F Ratio as well?
Are you running a stock exhuast? Powersteering?
What did Technodyne charge you? Did you check theA/F Ratio as well?
Trending Topics
Eh? SAE vs. STD?
I don't really care; I paid $125 for an hour of tunning and dyno. guessing they checked the A/F; I have a V-AFC doesn't that do it? Not sure. I just took it in and told them to make it fast ;-)
I don't really care; I paid $125 for an hour of tunning and dyno. guessing they checked the A/F; I have a V-AFC doesn't that do it? Not sure. I just took it in and told them to make it fast ;-)
Thats a pretty decent price if they were the ones that tuned it.
I paid $100 for 1.5 hours at Street Flight, but I did my own S-AFC and cam gear tuning.
As for STD vs SAE...theres a adifferance...as well as the Smoothing the Winpep software was set at.
Example:
SAE HP: 170.8
SAE TQ: 143.7
(Smoothing Level 1)
STD HP: 173.1
STD TQ: 145.6
(Smoothing Level 5)
STD HP: 174.7
STD TQ: 145.3
[Modified by HX_Guy, 12:22 PM 12/5/2001]
I paid $100 for 1.5 hours at Street Flight, but I did my own S-AFC and cam gear tuning.
As for STD vs SAE...theres a adifferance...as well as the Smoothing the Winpep software was set at.
Example:
SAE HP: 170.8
SAE TQ: 143.7
(Smoothing Level 1)
STD HP: 173.1
STD TQ: 145.6
(Smoothing Level 5)
STD HP: 174.7
STD TQ: 145.3
[Modified by HX_Guy, 12:22 PM 12/5/2001]
Ah, I see what you are saying.
Well, for me the numbers don't matter. I am not really shooting for a goal. I just wanted it tunned up, etc.
He said at 7000+ RPM my exhaust was huge plumes of black smoke so he said he fixed that and leaned it out.
VTEC crossover is not as dramatic at all anymore; I barely feel it, probably because he smoothed it out.
Well, for me the numbers don't matter. I am not really shooting for a goal. I just wanted it tunned up, etc.
He said at 7000+ RPM my exhaust was huge plumes of black smoke so he said he fixed that and leaned it out.
VTEC crossover is not as dramatic at all anymore; I barely feel it, probably because he smoothed it out.
Looks real nice. Good Numbers!! I really gotta get to a local dyno here in Chicago this winter to tune my v-afc. Anyone know of one local here in Chicago?
ITR-Animal, my entire exhaust system is stock except for the header and the carsound catalytic converter. I honestly feel that an exhaust would not do much, except for decreasing back pressure.
Sorry to say, but I think that is my last engine mod. I don't want to do much more to the car because I think the current setup gives me good power, but at the same time a reliable car. The only thing I am going to change is that over the summer I will buy a really nice header (probably custom made) to really exploit top end power. Other than that I think I am done.
Thanks for all the nice comments guys!
Sorry to say, but I think that is my last engine mod. I don't want to do much more to the car because I think the current setup gives me good power, but at the same time a reliable car. The only thing I am going to change is that over the summer I will buy a really nice header (probably custom made) to really exploit top end power. Other than that I think I am done.
Thanks for all the nice comments guys!
VTEC crossover is at 5200 according to the dyno place (need to look at the V-AFC to verify). Like I said, I can barely feel it now.
In terms of the smoothness of the graph, I think HX_Guy eluded to the fact that some smoothing was done on the graph itself. I guess it really all depends on how many data points the dyno actually took. I really wish they had given me a file with the points.
In terms of the smoothness of the graph, I think HX_Guy eluded to the fact that some smoothing was done on the graph itself. I guess it really all depends on how many data points the dyno actually took. I really wish they had given me a file with the points.
It's ok. Haha, anyway it looks really good Chris, nice smooth curve with very reasonable numbers. Also, you didn't waste a ton of $$ on dyno time, nice and simple. What's this I'm done w/mods bs, you better be getting more than a header next summer.
if he used sae method he would have a peak of 169 whp instead of 174. on my standard dyno i got 170 whp with just a aem intake, when i compared it to sae i lost about 4-5 whp.


