dissapointed big time, but it wasnt the car's fault nor mine
it was the track fucked up big time , muddy and ****

heres the two best runs i got :

#1:
60-foot : 2.535
1/4 mile : 15.128
speed : 159.35kmh ( very close to 100mph )

#2
60-foot : 2.714
1/4 mile : 15.138
speed : 159.70



96-spec JDM R with only exhaust , the rest stock , minus front passenger recaro and less craps in the trunk

 

Did you launch?

If you did, then Don't try so hard and bring that 60 ft down.

 

i couldnt , the track was **** , lots of dirt and mud from the start line

i've done 14.5 in this car , when it was bog standard

 

Did you know the track was in that shape before running?

 

i didnt , the organisers said the weather looking good , so i went there and paid right away , found out the track was in a bad condition

oh well

at least the trap speed tells me of what the car capable of doing

 

I thought that those traps were in MPH

I've never trapped more than 98MPH, but i'm a fat ***.

 

lol i wish it was mph man !!!

 

holy 60ft batman lol

 

You were asleep on the line! Rt wont change the final et, so you must have not been double clutchin like ya should!

 

dont worry man. I was at the track this weekend too and ran a 15.0 at 157 km/h flat in the wet and car covered in mud so its all good

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NZMugenITR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dont worry man. I was at the track this weekend too and ran a 15.0 at 157 km/h flat in the wet and car covered in mud so its all good</TD></TR></TABLE>

mud bogging? why would anyone even bother to race in the wet?

 

Gee, from the title, I thought you went to the track. Sounds like you went to the dragstrip. Poser...

 

eh.......i wouldn't sweat it. Doesn't appear to be anything you had control over....except for maybe paying before checking out the conditions ! I would have bitched and said i want my $ back. I think thats some bullshit!