Street alignment settings for CRX - suspension experts please!
My car will be getting a 1.5-2" drop soon through omnipower coilovers and I will be getting an alignment. I have energy suspension bushings all over (and the bruises up and down my arms to prove it), a progress camber kit, and 205/50/15 azenis on 15x7 rotas.
I am doing mainly street driving and may do some autocross in the future, not sure yet. I have come up with a list of alignment settings that I think will be good, anyone with opinions chime in.
Front
Caster - +4 degrees plus/minus 1 degree (not adjustable)
Camber - -1.5 degrees
Toe - 0mm
Rear
Camber - -1.5 degrees
Toe - 0mm or 2mm out (my biggest concern)
I am doing mainly street driving and may do some autocross in the future, not sure yet. I have come up with a list of alignment settings that I think will be good, anyone with opinions chime in.
Front
Caster - +4 degrees plus/minus 1 degree (not adjustable)
Camber - -1.5 degrees
Toe - 0mm
Rear
Camber - -1.5 degrees
Toe - 0mm or 2mm out (my biggest concern)
what reading did you do that says zero front toe is good? toe out 1/16" total, (1/32 each side) if you dont want to be too aggressive. 1.5deg camber is fine. rear toe should be zero, or slightly toed in.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tyson »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what reading did you do that says zero front toe is good? toe out 1/16" total, (1/32 each side) if you dont want to be too aggressive. 1.5deg camber is fine. rear toe should be zero, or slightly toed in. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I based a lot of my setup on Whiteline Australias Civic setups. They add caster when possible, run a little negative camber up front (-1.25 to -1.75), and set front toe at 0mm which is usually the stock setting. As for the rear, its around -1.5 camber and toe is 2mm to 4mm out. The focus of most Whiteline Honda setups seems to be the addition of caster. And while I am not too familiar with the effects of toe, I would guess just by the directions of the tires with 2-4mm of toe out in the rear, that would cause the rear to rotate better while the positive caster up front would increase front stability.
I based a lot of my setup on Whiteline Australias Civic setups. They add caster when possible, run a little negative camber up front (-1.25 to -1.75), and set front toe at 0mm which is usually the stock setting. As for the rear, its around -1.5 camber and toe is 2mm to 4mm out. The focus of most Whiteline Honda setups seems to be the addition of caster. And while I am not too familiar with the effects of toe, I would guess just by the directions of the tires with 2-4mm of toe out in the rear, that would cause the rear to rotate better while the positive caster up front would increase front stability.
let me give you a hint on traction:
increasing the grip in the rear makes the car less able to rotate.
your assessment on wanting to turn the outer rear wheel out is counter productive.
increasing the grip in the rear makes the car less able to rotate.
your assessment on wanting to turn the outer rear wheel out is counter productive.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr.Saturn »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...I am not too familiar with the effects of toe...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Point taken, but thats why I'm here, thanks Tyson.
Point taken, but thats why I'm here, thanks Tyson.
not specifically for crx's, more fwd cars in general. but i've been told a good starting point is as much castor as possible at the front with slight toe out and about 1.5 neg camber.
zero toe at the rear
zero toe at the rear
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
glagola1
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
2
Jul 5, 2008 03:29 PM
$amGD3
Suspension & Brakes
11
Sep 5, 2005 05:16 PM





