What brand gas do you run in your R?
I was reading in the integra forum and people were saying that arco gas is crappy, I always run 93 octane in my R. Just curious what gas station fellow type R owners fill up at.
i dont have an R, but i do have basically an R motor at 12.5:1 compression, i use Shell gas, best gas in my opinion. i was using mobil for a while...still doesnt seem like it runs as clean as shell does.
bump for a fellow milano red Si owner
bump for a fellow milano red Si owner

Sunoco Blue Supreme 112 Octane
For late-model Sportsman, Modifieds, offshore powerboats, and long endurance racing. Sunoco Supreme™ is a winner for engines that regularly run in excess of 7,000 rpm. It's specially formulated to help prevent vapor lock in the fuel system which can lead to a loss of power.
It's only 292 for a 54 gallon drum and you can order it from here: http://www.worldwideracingfuels.com/index.html
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xmilanoredsix »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I did a search but found nothing...hmmmm anyone else</TD></TR></TABLE>
DONT LIE TO ME
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=702510
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=568289
DONT LIE TO ME
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=702510
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=568289
Trending Topics
Alway 93 octpain. Depends where you live. In NC we have Kangaroo gas stations that I steer clear of. I mostly use BP or Shell V-Power (world's latest marketing scheme).
I filled up on 93 this morning a BP for $1.99 so prices are dropping.
I filled up on 93 this morning a BP for $1.99 so prices are dropping.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xmilanoredsix »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I was reading in the integra forum and people were saying that arco gas is crappy, I always run 93 octane in my R. Just curious what gas station fellow type R owners fill up at.</TD></TR></TABLE>
where do you get 93 in so Ca?
where do you get 93 in so Ca?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xmilanoredsix »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I did a search but found nothing...hmmmm anyone else</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh, SURE you did.
I did a search on ITR topics with "gas" in the title, and these popped up:
<u>Recent topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=935503
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=937462
<u>Archived topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=702510
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=568289
Oh, SURE you did.

I did a search on ITR topics with "gas" in the title, and these popped up:
<u>Recent topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=935503
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=937462
<u>Archived topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=702510
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=568289
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TypeR 599 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
where do you get 93 in so Ca?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You dont
91 octane here...almost $3 a gallon in SoCal...try to hit Mobile..everything else i have ever used has given me a CEL...never pumped Arco..pump 76..car dont turn on..(no its not stock
)
VP100 at the track...but that 112 for 292..i think im going to order me some
where do you get 93 in so Ca?</TD></TR></TABLE>
You dont
91 octane here...almost $3 a gallon in SoCal...try to hit Mobile..everything else i have ever used has given me a CEL...never pumped Arco..pump 76..car dont turn on..(no its not stock
)VP100 at the track...but that 112 for 292..i think im going to order me some
Both of those recent topics dont really have to do with what I asked, One is about what octane and oil. Yet thank you for the archived ones, I will have to look a little harder next time
I just wanted to know what brand<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxtasy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Oh, SURE you did.
I did a search on ITR topics with "gas" in the title, and these popped up:
<u>Recent topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=935503
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=937462
<u>Archived topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=702510
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=568289
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I just wanted to know what brand<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxtasy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Oh, SURE you did.

I did a search on ITR topics with "gas" in the title, and these popped up:
<u>Recent topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=935503
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=937462
<u>Archived topics</u>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=702510
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=568289
</TD></TR></TABLE>
While we are on this topic, this article was in the Kansas City Star this morning. I thought it would be informative and shed some light on the quality of gas we are using.
EDIT: Trying to fix the link
EDIT: Trying to fix the link
I used to be strictly mobil, or exxon, but now I'm using sunoco the most. 94 octane when I have the money, 93 the rest of the time.
I can not fix the link..... and the site requires you to sign in so unfortunately I have to post the article. I know that this technically has nothing to do with octane ratings and such but is more directly aimed at the deposits that are left by some gasolines. SORRY
Automakers, oil industry in fuel fight
Car companies want more gas additives
By STEVE EVERLY
The Kansas City Star
“Frankly, we didn't want too much input.”
Andrew Buczynsky of GM, about the new fuel standards
Some members of Big Auto and Big Oil are at loggerheads over the quality of gasoline pumped into automobiles in this country.
A consortium of major automakers, citing persistent repair problems and troubling product tests, recently concluded that the quality of U.S. gasoline varies widely and often doesn't burn clean enough to keep engines running smoothly.
And now, in a move that is roiling much of the oil industry, General Motors, Honda, Toyota and BMW have banded together to push a new industry fuel standard. If that standard is adopted, it will increase levels of gasoline additives that prevent deposits on intake valves and fuel injectors that foul engines and affect performance, emissions and fuel economy.
The new class of fuel, dubbed “Top Tier Detergent Gasoline,” is a voluntary standard that exceeds the current standard set by the Environmental Protection Agency. But gas marketers, under pressure from automakers, may find it hard to ignore, since it could put them at a competitive disadvantage.
Gasoline sold by QuikTrip — the area's biggest fuel marketer — already meets the Top Tier criteria. ChevronTexaco, which has no retail presence in the area, also has adopted the standard. Other companies, including Shell Oil, have plans to meet the new standard.
The push comes as the automakers say they are seeing persistent problems such as clogged fuel injectors and as they begin to introduce a new generation of vehicles engineered to meet tougher environmental standards. Those new vehicles especially will need fuel with more additives.
The automakers are buttressing their case with an industry analysis that tested fuel samples taken from cities across the country — including Kansas City. It shows detergent levels in gasoline dropping nearly 50 percent since 1996.
“We've just felt for a long time that gasoline detergency was not at a proper level,” said Andrew Buczynsky, a GM fuel engineer.
The American Petroleum Institute, an association that represents the oil industry, said it was surprised and disappointed by the automakers' decision to push Top Tier without seeking the advice of oil companies. The association has sent a letter to the automakers seeking the data used to back their allegations and offering to conduct additional gasoline tests.
“At this point, we're waiting for a response,” said Ed Murphy, downstream manager for the American Petroleum Institute.
Top Tier is intended to give motorists greater comfort that the fuel they buy has sufficient cleaning ability. Experts say the cost of adding the needed detergents is a fraction of a cent per gallon.
The controversy over the quality of gasoline challenges the widely held belief that all gasoline is about the same.
The auto industry analysis reveals that different brands have different detergent levels. And while all gasoline is thought to at least meet the EPA's minimum standard for detergents, the automakers say that level is often insufficient to keep engines clean.
Although the cost of introducing Top Tier gasoline would be minimal for consumers, it could threaten how some oil companies market premium fuel, which costs about 20 cents more per gallon than regular gas.
Premium accounts for about 15 percent of gasoline sales, but experts estimate that demand for premium would fall to about 5 percent if only cars that needed the extra octane used premium.
Some oil companies have sought to increase sales of premium by touting that it contains a higher level of detergents. But Top Tier will blur that advantage, since all grades, including regular, will have to meet the new standard if a marketer wants to participate in the program.
So far, Top Tier gas has received scant attention. But that is expected to change as it is included in gasoline marketing.
Automakers plan to publicize a list of gas companies offering the fuel and are developing a Top Tier logo for gas pumps. They have created a Web site at http://www.toptiergas. com.
Groups such as the A A A are beginning to hear about the new fuel standard. The automobile association is currently considering whether to support the Top Tier program.
“We have the same basic concerns that the automakers have,” said Michael Hecht, manager of technical services for AAA Auto Club of Missouri. “We support it.”
Questions about fuel quality once seemed settled.
In the 1980s, additives became an issue when fuel injection became popular in new cars and trucks. The injectors often became clogged, and the problem was traced to gasoline with insufficient detergent additives.
Automakers began to publish “good gas” lists. The lists were eventually dropped at the urging of some gas marketers, but by then the problem had eased.
Still, some gas companies weren't using detergents and, in a move supported by the auto industry, federal regulators mandated specific levels of the additives. The EPA finalized the regulation in 1997.
But something happened after the new regulation took effect: The amount of detergents in the nation's gas supply dropped sharply.
The Alliance for Automobile Manufacturers twice a year takes gasoline samples in 26 U.S. cities — including Kansas City. One of the tests is for “unwashed gum,” which is an indicator of the amount of detergents in gasoline.
In the winter following the EPA standard going into effect, according to AAM tests, unwashed gum levels in regular gas dropped more than 20 percent. By 2002, gum levels had declined about 50 percent. Although recent tests show slightly higher levels, they are still low.
Joe Colucci, a retired director of research and development at GM who now operates Automotive Fuels Consulting, said reducing detergent additives to the EPA regulation level was seen by some companies as a way to reduce costs. Although detergents cost only a fraction of a cent per gallon, it adds up to an enormous sum because of the huge volume of gas sold.
“They would say to themselves, ‘We'll meet the letter of the law,' and that's what has happened with much of the gasoline,” Colucci said.
By 2002, the automakers say repair records suggested that the EPA standard for detergents wasn't high enough. They approached the EPA about increasing gasoline detergents, but say they were rebuffed.
“We would have liked to have had some leadership from the EPA, but we just haven't been able to get that,” said John Cabaniss, a director of engineering at the International Auto Manufacturers Association.
An EPA spokesman said the agency was unaware of the industry attempt to improve the fuel standard. He said the agency's program mandates that certified detergents be used and in what amounts.
“The program is working well,” said EPA spokesman David Ryan.
But questions about the EPA standard appear to have been the focus of growing concern at industry forums, such as an vehicle emissions conference in Chattanooga, Tenn., late last year attended by oil and auto companies.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers described “continuing problems from inadequate additives use” and said the EPA needs to update its regulations, according to information presented at the conference. Another speaker said he was seeing problems with fuel injector fouling even when the fuel met EPA requirements.
Some oil companies question the standard as well.
Shell Oil estimates that 60 percent of the fuel sold in the United States is at or near the “EPA minimum level of detergency” and says that has caused problems in some cars.
“We have measured significant deposit buildup in certain vehicles in as little as 5,000 miles,” Shell stated in one document.
Early this year, GM approached Honda, Toyota and BMW to join in an effort to improve gasoline detergent levels. GM believed that an organized group rather than a lone automaker would show the seriousness of the issue.
The move came at a time when automakers were beginning to produce vehicles to meet the EPA's “Tier 2” environmental standards for reduced emissions. Such vehicles need quality fuel to avoid reduced performance.
“We feel high detergency is preferable,” said Douglas McGregor, an emissions compliance engineer for BMW.
In early April, the American Petroleum Institute held a meeting in Detroit for the oil and auto industries. A week before the meeting, the association received a letter stating that the four automakers would be discussing the Top Tier program.
“We were disappointed,” said Murphy of the petroleum institute, adding that his group didn't know Top Tier was even in the works before receiving the letter.
The oil industry wasn't given an opportunity to give its advice, Murphy said, adding that a new fuel standard typically involves cooperation between the industries.
But collaboration is unlikely. The automakers say they have previously reached out to the oil industry with concerns, but nothing happened. As a result, the automakers decided to proceed unilaterally with a new fuel standard.
“Frankly, we didn't want too much input,” said Buczynsky, of GM. “Because when we have, it would always drop down to the bare minimum.”
The Top Tier standard was modeled after California's fuel quality regulations, which allow half the deposits on intake valves that the federal rules permit. Buczynsky said the amount of detergents in Top Tier-certified gasoline will be two to three times the current EPA standard.
While some brands of gas currently have more than the EPA standard, according to the auto industry's testing, there are many at the minimum level of detergent.
A gasoline marketer who wants to meet the Top Tier standard must do it for all grades — not just premium — and make it available at all stations.
While meeting the standard will require testing, automakers say they strive to minimize costs. Despite the additional detergents, the cost is expected to be a fraction of a cent per gallon.
But the Society of Independent Gas Marketers of America fears that any additional costs could prevent some members from offering the Top Tier gas.
“A fraction of a cent can be a substantial part of your profit,” said Tom Osborne, a spokesman for the group.
The independent marketers group, however, has invited a GM representative to address its members. The society's staff also has been instructed to begin helping members who want to participate in the Top Tier program. One of its major members, QuikTrip, already has qualified for the Top Tier program.
More major brands are expected to make similar announcements so competitors don't get an edge. Shell plans to have all grades of its gas certified Top Tier this summer
Automakers, oil industry in fuel fight
Car companies want more gas additives
By STEVE EVERLY
The Kansas City Star
“Frankly, we didn't want too much input.”
Andrew Buczynsky of GM, about the new fuel standards
Some members of Big Auto and Big Oil are at loggerheads over the quality of gasoline pumped into automobiles in this country.
A consortium of major automakers, citing persistent repair problems and troubling product tests, recently concluded that the quality of U.S. gasoline varies widely and often doesn't burn clean enough to keep engines running smoothly.
And now, in a move that is roiling much of the oil industry, General Motors, Honda, Toyota and BMW have banded together to push a new industry fuel standard. If that standard is adopted, it will increase levels of gasoline additives that prevent deposits on intake valves and fuel injectors that foul engines and affect performance, emissions and fuel economy.
The new class of fuel, dubbed “Top Tier Detergent Gasoline,” is a voluntary standard that exceeds the current standard set by the Environmental Protection Agency. But gas marketers, under pressure from automakers, may find it hard to ignore, since it could put them at a competitive disadvantage.
Gasoline sold by QuikTrip — the area's biggest fuel marketer — already meets the Top Tier criteria. ChevronTexaco, which has no retail presence in the area, also has adopted the standard. Other companies, including Shell Oil, have plans to meet the new standard.
The push comes as the automakers say they are seeing persistent problems such as clogged fuel injectors and as they begin to introduce a new generation of vehicles engineered to meet tougher environmental standards. Those new vehicles especially will need fuel with more additives.
The automakers are buttressing their case with an industry analysis that tested fuel samples taken from cities across the country — including Kansas City. It shows detergent levels in gasoline dropping nearly 50 percent since 1996.
“We've just felt for a long time that gasoline detergency was not at a proper level,” said Andrew Buczynsky, a GM fuel engineer.
The American Petroleum Institute, an association that represents the oil industry, said it was surprised and disappointed by the automakers' decision to push Top Tier without seeking the advice of oil companies. The association has sent a letter to the automakers seeking the data used to back their allegations and offering to conduct additional gasoline tests.
“At this point, we're waiting for a response,” said Ed Murphy, downstream manager for the American Petroleum Institute.
Top Tier is intended to give motorists greater comfort that the fuel they buy has sufficient cleaning ability. Experts say the cost of adding the needed detergents is a fraction of a cent per gallon.
The controversy over the quality of gasoline challenges the widely held belief that all gasoline is about the same.
The auto industry analysis reveals that different brands have different detergent levels. And while all gasoline is thought to at least meet the EPA's minimum standard for detergents, the automakers say that level is often insufficient to keep engines clean.
Although the cost of introducing Top Tier gasoline would be minimal for consumers, it could threaten how some oil companies market premium fuel, which costs about 20 cents more per gallon than regular gas.
Premium accounts for about 15 percent of gasoline sales, but experts estimate that demand for premium would fall to about 5 percent if only cars that needed the extra octane used premium.
Some oil companies have sought to increase sales of premium by touting that it contains a higher level of detergents. But Top Tier will blur that advantage, since all grades, including regular, will have to meet the new standard if a marketer wants to participate in the program.
So far, Top Tier gas has received scant attention. But that is expected to change as it is included in gasoline marketing.
Automakers plan to publicize a list of gas companies offering the fuel and are developing a Top Tier logo for gas pumps. They have created a Web site at http://www.toptiergas. com.
Groups such as the A A A are beginning to hear about the new fuel standard. The automobile association is currently considering whether to support the Top Tier program.
“We have the same basic concerns that the automakers have,” said Michael Hecht, manager of technical services for AAA Auto Club of Missouri. “We support it.”
Questions about fuel quality once seemed settled.
In the 1980s, additives became an issue when fuel injection became popular in new cars and trucks. The injectors often became clogged, and the problem was traced to gasoline with insufficient detergent additives.
Automakers began to publish “good gas” lists. The lists were eventually dropped at the urging of some gas marketers, but by then the problem had eased.
Still, some gas companies weren't using detergents and, in a move supported by the auto industry, federal regulators mandated specific levels of the additives. The EPA finalized the regulation in 1997.
But something happened after the new regulation took effect: The amount of detergents in the nation's gas supply dropped sharply.
The Alliance for Automobile Manufacturers twice a year takes gasoline samples in 26 U.S. cities — including Kansas City. One of the tests is for “unwashed gum,” which is an indicator of the amount of detergents in gasoline.
In the winter following the EPA standard going into effect, according to AAM tests, unwashed gum levels in regular gas dropped more than 20 percent. By 2002, gum levels had declined about 50 percent. Although recent tests show slightly higher levels, they are still low.
Joe Colucci, a retired director of research and development at GM who now operates Automotive Fuels Consulting, said reducing detergent additives to the EPA regulation level was seen by some companies as a way to reduce costs. Although detergents cost only a fraction of a cent per gallon, it adds up to an enormous sum because of the huge volume of gas sold.
“They would say to themselves, ‘We'll meet the letter of the law,' and that's what has happened with much of the gasoline,” Colucci said.
By 2002, the automakers say repair records suggested that the EPA standard for detergents wasn't high enough. They approached the EPA about increasing gasoline detergents, but say they were rebuffed.
“We would have liked to have had some leadership from the EPA, but we just haven't been able to get that,” said John Cabaniss, a director of engineering at the International Auto Manufacturers Association.
An EPA spokesman said the agency was unaware of the industry attempt to improve the fuel standard. He said the agency's program mandates that certified detergents be used and in what amounts.
“The program is working well,” said EPA spokesman David Ryan.
But questions about the EPA standard appear to have been the focus of growing concern at industry forums, such as an vehicle emissions conference in Chattanooga, Tenn., late last year attended by oil and auto companies.
The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers described “continuing problems from inadequate additives use” and said the EPA needs to update its regulations, according to information presented at the conference. Another speaker said he was seeing problems with fuel injector fouling even when the fuel met EPA requirements.
Some oil companies question the standard as well.
Shell Oil estimates that 60 percent of the fuel sold in the United States is at or near the “EPA minimum level of detergency” and says that has caused problems in some cars.
“We have measured significant deposit buildup in certain vehicles in as little as 5,000 miles,” Shell stated in one document.
Early this year, GM approached Honda, Toyota and BMW to join in an effort to improve gasoline detergent levels. GM believed that an organized group rather than a lone automaker would show the seriousness of the issue.
The move came at a time when automakers were beginning to produce vehicles to meet the EPA's “Tier 2” environmental standards for reduced emissions. Such vehicles need quality fuel to avoid reduced performance.
“We feel high detergency is preferable,” said Douglas McGregor, an emissions compliance engineer for BMW.
In early April, the American Petroleum Institute held a meeting in Detroit for the oil and auto industries. A week before the meeting, the association received a letter stating that the four automakers would be discussing the Top Tier program.
“We were disappointed,” said Murphy of the petroleum institute, adding that his group didn't know Top Tier was even in the works before receiving the letter.
The oil industry wasn't given an opportunity to give its advice, Murphy said, adding that a new fuel standard typically involves cooperation between the industries.
But collaboration is unlikely. The automakers say they have previously reached out to the oil industry with concerns, but nothing happened. As a result, the automakers decided to proceed unilaterally with a new fuel standard.
“Frankly, we didn't want too much input,” said Buczynsky, of GM. “Because when we have, it would always drop down to the bare minimum.”
The Top Tier standard was modeled after California's fuel quality regulations, which allow half the deposits on intake valves that the federal rules permit. Buczynsky said the amount of detergents in Top Tier-certified gasoline will be two to three times the current EPA standard.
While some brands of gas currently have more than the EPA standard, according to the auto industry's testing, there are many at the minimum level of detergent.
A gasoline marketer who wants to meet the Top Tier standard must do it for all grades — not just premium — and make it available at all stations.
While meeting the standard will require testing, automakers say they strive to minimize costs. Despite the additional detergents, the cost is expected to be a fraction of a cent per gallon.
But the Society of Independent Gas Marketers of America fears that any additional costs could prevent some members from offering the Top Tier gas.
“A fraction of a cent can be a substantial part of your profit,” said Tom Osborne, a spokesman for the group.
The independent marketers group, however, has invited a GM representative to address its members. The society's staff also has been instructed to begin helping members who want to participate in the Top Tier program. One of its major members, QuikTrip, already has qualified for the Top Tier program.
More major brands are expected to make similar announcements so competitors don't get an edge. Shell plans to have all grades of its gas certified Top Tier this summer
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .D2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">cliffs?</TD></TR></TABLE>
ROFL! I mean c'mon, its Sudnay for God's sake. Are you really going to make us read all that?
ROFL! I mean c'mon, its Sudnay for God's sake. Are you really going to make us read all that?




