Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 06:53 AM
  #1  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header

Do anyone here have dyno sheet comparing Comtech Street 2.25" header and stock 2.25" header on ITR???? what are the gain/loss on hp & torque. deciding whether it's worth $500 to purchase 1.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 07:04 AM
  #2  
danny98r's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 769
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

ur better off going with a dc jdm 4-1 or just a jdm 4-1. a bigger collector means more potential. dont waste ur money on comptech too expensive with no gains imo..
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 07:09 AM
  #3  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (danny98r)

i do/did have DC JDM 4-1 and they suck

1) collector is so big that air flows straight up to the rear bumper that it made black sh*t over the paint

2) decreases torque

3) o2 sensor reads all retarded

4) kills your fuel mileage

5) DC sux


Modified by integrasi at 8:58 AM 7/26/2004
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:20 AM
  #4  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

bump any1?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:38 AM
  #5  
1GreyTeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,136
Likes: 2
From: kuidaore
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by integrasi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i do/did have DC JDM 4-1 and they suck

1) collector is so big that air flows straight up to the rear bumper that it made black sh*t over the paint</TD></TR></TABLE>

The collector has Nothing to do with this. Did you have a cat in place.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">2) decreases torque</TD></TR></TABLE>

Never saw this. Yours is the first report I've seen, got any graphs to compare.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">3) o2 sensor reads all retarded</TD></TR></TABLE>

Retarded? Not exactly scientific. Dunno why unless it was damaged upon install or was going bad or went bad in some way, the header should have nothing to do with this.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">4) kills your fuel mileage</TD></TR></TABLE>

Not in my experience, my gas mileage actually improved, you sure this isn't attributed to more aggressive or abusive driving just because the mod was added.


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">5) DC sux</TD></TR></TABLE>

I remember when DC was the ****. But, don't forget that he also mentioned the STOCK OEM JDM ITR 4-1 Header.

Might be old but still worth showing or mentioning in this instance:

http://bob123e.tripod.com/thegreatheadertest/

Here's the Comptech 4-2-1:



And heres the JDM DC 4-1:



And finally the JDM ITR 4-1:




Of course results may vary with different cars/motors.


And no bumping in this forum btw.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 08:43 AM
  #6  
Spoon Spec EK's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 267
Likes: 0
From: SoCal, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

I don't know where you are getting those ideas about the DC. My only complaint is that it hangs too low. As long as the car is properly tuned, it will run great.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:09 AM
  #7  
jond's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,406
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (Spoon Spec EK)

I just looked at "The Great Header Test" and they show Comptechs header making the exact same peak HP as the DC JDM header. Ruffly 11whp more than stock.

I dont know the specifics as to whether it was bolted up to a regular cat, or 2.5'' cat though.


Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:35 AM
  #8  
cruzersi99's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (1GreyTeg)

Please excuse Young, he's been known on Clubsi to use poor judgement, buy expensive parts, buy useless parts, and do his own installs without proper tools or experience.

Young-

Do some searching, now that you have that motor in the car, please do things right
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:36 AM
  #9  
The Kernel's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: IL, USA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (jond)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jond &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I just looked at "The Great Header Test" and they show Comptechs header making the exact same peak HP as the DC JDM header. Ruffly 11whp more than stock.

I dont know the specifics as to whether it was bolted up to a regular cat, or 2.5'' cat though.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Here's the notes I saved about that:

"Just some info about the Comp Tech piece at the header test. It was the only stock bolt on header tested (except the stock manifold) and therefore needed it's own test pipe to bolt up to the 2-1/2" system used. The test pipe was stepped from 2-1/4" to 2-1/2" to bolt to the cat back system. A 2-1/4" flex joint works perfectly on a 2" collector donut. All the other headers had JDM type collectors and used a full 2-1/2" test pipe. "
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:50 AM
  #10  
jond's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 4,406
Likes: 0
From: Brooklyn, NY
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (NBP #0933)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NBP #0933 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Here's the notes I saved about that:

"Just some info about the Comp Tech piece at the header test. It was the only stock bolt on header tested (except the stock manifold) and therefore needed it's own test pipe to bolt up to the 2-1/2" system used. The test pipe was stepped from 2-1/4" to 2-1/2" to bolt to the cat back system. A 2-1/4" flex joint works perfectly on a 2" collector donut. All the other headers had JDM type collectors and used a full 2-1/2" test pipe. "</TD></TR></TABLE>

Awesome!!!
Was the stock manifold also hooked to the 2.5'' exhaust?

Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:53 AM
  #11  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (cruzersi00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cruzersi00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Please excuse Young, he's been known on Clubsi to use poor judgement, buy expensive parts, buy useless parts, and do his own installs without proper tools or experience.

Young-

Do some searching, now that you have that motor in the car, please do things right </TD></TR></TABLE>


at least mine is faster than yours
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:54 AM
  #12  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

keep in mind this forum is comptech vs. stock damn it. NOT comptech vs. DC 4-1
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 09:57 AM
  #13  
jiahanhao's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA, USA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

i'm pretty happy with my dc jdm 4-1, at least until i get my smsp header
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 10:11 AM
  #14  
The Kernel's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 573
Likes: 0
From: IL, USA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (jond)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jond &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Awesome!!!
Was the stock manifold also hooked to the 2.5'' exhaust?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Good question but I don't know the answer. I imagine it should have been. That way the header would be the only part of the system that changed.

Does anybody else know? SMSP? Sackdz?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 11:03 AM
  #15  
irev210's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 0
From: Southern cali or boston
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (NBP #0933)

i am almost tempted to post up some pictures of comptech header

eh **** it, why not










Features-

-Ground Clearance: Offers the best groundclearance for the power made
-Carb EQ #- PERFECTLY legal
-quality, Stainless steel w/ tig welds- Will last pretty much forever- wont crack like others
-design, stepped primaries, 4-2-1- makes good power, compact design- BOLTS to factory cat. Dont need to modify exhaust or cat.

Not everyone is just looking for the biggest HP #

Comptech, while having great daily driven characteristics happens to make more power then any other "Bolt on" header that I know of.

Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 01:05 PM
  #16  
cruzersi99's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by integrasi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


at least mine is faster than yours </TD></TR></TABLE>

I'd love to run it at the track and see Young

That means you'll need more than an engine, mods, and your mouth.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 01:09 PM
  #17  
cruzersi99's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (irev210)

More power than the Toda?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #18  
irev210's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,699
Likes: 0
From: Southern cali or boston
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (cruzersi00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cruzersi00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">More power than the Toda?</TD></TR></TABLE>


toda has a 2.5" collector

Not bolt on.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 01:21 PM
  #19  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (cruzersi00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cruzersi00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">More power than the Toda?</TD></TR></TABLE> the car is making close to 200whp as of 7/21/04
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 01:29 PM
  #20  
cruzersi99's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

Young-

If this is truley the case then listen to everybody and upgrade to 2.5" collector header like the JDM 4-1 or JDM DC 4-1.

The comptech may not have enough flow for your "built" engine.

So if you're pushing 200whp, that means that you did cams on your b18c5? Does this also mean you paid someone to tune it?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 03:16 PM
  #21  
integrasi's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Irvine, CA
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (cruzersi00)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cruzersi00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Young-

If this is truley the case then listen to everybody and upgrade to 2.5" collector header like the JDM 4-1 or JDM DC 4-1.

The comptech may not have enough flow for your "built" engine.

So if you're pushing 200whp, that means that you did cams on your b18c5? Does this also mean you paid someone to tune it?</TD></TR></TABLE>

is it just me or u??? you have been missing on club si meets????? i have had jdm dc4-1 for almost 6 months. now i want something new. yes i just got some top secret cams & no i haven't tuned
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #22  
Opie's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,173
Likes: 0
From: Warning, gRand Return imminent,, NY, USA
Default

I dyno'd 171.xx and 123.xx with an AEM and my comptech 4-2-1. Im in no rush to change mine until I can afford a high end header like SMSP or Toda
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 03:41 PM
  #23  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

First, I should clarify that neither the OEM manifold nor the Comptech header have 2.25" collectors -- both are 2.00" OD. Secondly, while you may not appreciate most of the advice you've received here so far, it is indeed very useful. If you already have a DC JDM 4-1, and your setup is making the power you stated it is (in other words, a decently healthy build), the Comptech street header will quite simply be a step-down in terms of performance. The only advantages it offers are its CARB legality, its better ground clearance, and its arguably better build quality. If you're looking for something better, you'll have to look towards the more high-performance headers, such as SMSP, DTR, Toda, Comptech race, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 04:01 PM
  #24  
cygnusX1's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (irev210)

hey "irev210"... are you the same guy selling pistons on ebay?
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2004 | 05:02 PM
  #25  
len's Avatar
len
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 7,187
Likes: 1
Default Re: Comptech Header Vs. Stock ITR Header (integrasi)

Member "Austin" is an expert when it comes to Comptech.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:12 AM.