TWM Itb in LS/VTEC 1.8 whp dyno.
Does anyone have this LS/Vtec setup:
B16A (PR3) P&P
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
LS Block stock rods
DTR Header
TWM ITB's
Making 228whp / 154ft.lb 100octane!
What's the most WHP have H-T members been able to achieve using stock CTR pistons ?
Modified by AMGTortoise at 4:39 PM 7/15/2004
Modified by AMGTortoise at 4:40 PM 7/15/2004
Modified by AMGTortoise at 4:46 PM 7/15/2004
B16A (PR3) P&P
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
LS Block stock rods
DTR Header
TWM ITB's
Making 228whp / 154ft.lb 100octane!
What's the most WHP have H-T members been able to achieve using stock CTR pistons ?
Modified by AMGTortoise at 4:39 PM 7/15/2004
Modified by AMGTortoise at 4:40 PM 7/15/2004
Modified by AMGTortoise at 4:46 PM 7/15/2004
Junior Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: The all motor Forum but my house is in, Iowa
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMGTortoise »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Does anyone have the following in their LS/VTEC:
B16A (PR3) P&P
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
LS Block stock rods
DTR Header
TWM ITB's
Engine makes 228whp / 154ft.lb 100octane
What's the most WHP have H-T members been able to achieve?</TD></TR></TABLE>
What are you asking? does anyone have this setup?
B16A (PR3) P&P
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
LS Block stock rods
DTR Header
TWM ITB's
Engine makes 228whp / 154ft.lb 100octane
What's the most WHP have H-T members been able to achieve?</TD></TR></TABLE>
What are you asking? does anyone have this setup?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMGTortoise »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B16A (PR3) P&P
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
LS Block stock rods
DTR Header
TWM ITB's
Engine makes 228whp / 154ft.lb 100octane
</TD></TR></TABLE>
not bad for a 1.8
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
LS Block stock rods
DTR Header
TWM ITB's
Engine makes 228whp / 154ft.lb 100octane
</TD></TR></TABLE>
not bad for a 1.8
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtecdamian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i made 233.8 without individuals and no $1200 header 93 octane by the way ****** full exhaust*****.........
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah, your motor it's 2.0L with a GSR Head, 85mm bore x 89mm stroke w/CP strutted pistons & Eagle rods, RS Machine cams, $700 headers, 1mm OS Ferrea valve & tuned *BTW, you have a dyno spike.
This motor it's a 81.25mm bore x 89mm crank a 1.8 untuned.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Yeah, your motor it's 2.0L with a GSR Head, 85mm bore x 89mm stroke w/CP strutted pistons & Eagle rods, RS Machine cams, $700 headers, 1mm OS Ferrea valve & tuned *BTW, you have a dyno spike.
This motor it's a 81.25mm bore x 89mm crank a 1.8 untuned.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMGTortoise »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Does anyone have this LS/Vtec setup:
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Can you explain this to me? are they stage 2's or 3's..
Nice tq for a 1.8 btw
You going to post the plot?
Skunk2 Stage 2 w/Stage 3 Cams
B16B Pistons .25os
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Can you explain this to me? are they stage 2's or 3's..
Nice tq for a 1.8 btw
You going to post the plot?
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtecdamian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">WRONG BORE/ WRONG VALVES/ WRONG CAMS........BUT YEA SINCE U BUILT IT YOU WOULD KNOW!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Zing pow!!!! Play nice fellas..
2 totally different type's of builds guy's, the 1.8 is more a race motor than the 2.0 so the argument can go both ways.
If your going to take a shot at Damian's plot , you should post yours, peak #'s are just #'s
Zing pow!!!! Play nice fellas..
2 totally different type's of builds guy's, the 1.8 is more a race motor than the 2.0 so the argument can go both ways.
If your going to take a shot at Damian's plot , you should post yours, peak #'s are just #'s
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by vtecdamian »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">WRONG BORE/ WRONG VALVES/ WRONG CAMS........BUT YEA SINCE U BUILT IT YOU WOULD KNOW!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nah, we don't built expensive tuned 2.0L inconsistent motors that runs 13's & bent valves
. The 1.8 that we've tuned runs consistent 12's & 11's with mostly factory parts.
Nah, we don't built expensive tuned 2.0L inconsistent motors that runs 13's & bent valves
. The 1.8 that we've tuned runs consistent 12's & 11's with mostly factory parts.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tbone »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Can you explain this to me? are they stage 2's or 3's..
Nice tq for a 1.8 btw
You going to post the plot? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Using Stage 2 intake cams & Stage 3 Exhaust cam. This setup gives us very good low end / Mid range, & also more cam ovelap duration.
Can you explain this to me? are they stage 2's or 3's..
Nice tq for a 1.8 btw
You going to post the plot? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Using Stage 2 intake cams & Stage 3 Exhaust cam. This setup gives us very good low end / Mid range, & also more cam ovelap duration.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMGTortoise »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Nah, we don't built expensive tuned 2.0L inconsistent motors that runs 13's & bent valves
. The 1.8 that we've tuned runs consistent 12's & 11's with mostly factory parts.</TD></TR></TABLE>
whos care are u talking about and who are you???? bent valves?...inconsistent....i dont know anyone running 11's.........in a street n/a car in miami
Nah, we don't built expensive tuned 2.0L inconsistent motors that runs 13's & bent valves
. The 1.8 that we've tuned runs consistent 12's & 11's with mostly factory parts.</TD></TR></TABLE>whos care are u talking about and who are you???? bent valves?...inconsistent....i dont know anyone running 11's.........in a street n/a car in miami
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AMGTortoise »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Using Stage 2 intake cams & Stage 3 Exhaust cam. This setup gives us very good low end / Mid range, & also more cam ovelap duration.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah I tried that setup in my motor, but I couldnt run it because of my .5mm over valves.
As far as you using mostly stock parts... you kinda contradicted yourself..
You have honda pistons not stock for that motor, so the correct definition would be factory parts. Aside from your rods and pistons, what else is stock? I guess the twm's are huh, or the PnP head, or how about the dtr header.
I guess the only thing i'll agree with you about in your posts is that it is impressive for a 1.8, but if your going to compare to my motor a nock on me for bending valves and being incositent, then let me throw on some itb's and we can talk. And my car runs consistent 11's if full street trim, has made close to 90 dyno pulls testing different products and as of last night still leaked down 2% ICE COLD.
Your attitude sucks and it evident that you really cant add anything positive to the board with your attacks and rants on others motors. Go away until you can play nice like the rest of the children....
Using Stage 2 intake cams & Stage 3 Exhaust cam. This setup gives us very good low end / Mid range, & also more cam ovelap duration.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah I tried that setup in my motor, but I couldnt run it because of my .5mm over valves.
As far as you using mostly stock parts... you kinda contradicted yourself..
You have honda pistons not stock for that motor, so the correct definition would be factory parts. Aside from your rods and pistons, what else is stock? I guess the twm's are huh, or the PnP head, or how about the dtr header.
I guess the only thing i'll agree with you about in your posts is that it is impressive for a 1.8, but if your going to compare to my motor a nock on me for bending valves and being incositent, then let me throw on some itb's and we can talk. And my car runs consistent 11's if full street trim, has made close to 90 dyno pulls testing different products and as of last night still leaked down 2% ICE COLD.
Your attitude sucks and it evident that you really cant add anything positive to the board with your attacks and rants on others motors. Go away until you can play nice like the rest of the children....
Looks like a pretty nice build, and good numbers for the setup. Nice torque...
I used to have PCT's in my old motor and I made 204whp, but I only had a jdm dc header, skunk mani, and stock head. So I guess a vague guess would be that ITB's, a real header, a ported head, can net you somwhere around 20-25whp on a 1.8L... good work.
I used to have PCT's in my old motor and I made 204whp, but I only had a jdm dc header, skunk mani, and stock head. So I guess a vague guess would be that ITB's, a real header, a ported head, can net you somwhere around 20-25whp on a 1.8L... good work.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
I made about 231whp but not that much torque, only high 140's range in torque ... this was with a spoon header ...
I can search around for a graph somewhere ... where was your motor peaking hp-wise ?
greg
I can search around for a graph somewhere ... where was your motor peaking hp-wise ?
greg
the car would make more power with skunk2 stage 2 cams. The CR is obviously very low and thee had cant be milled. why did you decided to go with the stage 3 cams
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by simple4012 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the car would make more power with skunk2 stage 2 cams. The CR is obviously very low and thee had cant be milled. why did you decided to go with the stage 3 cams</TD></TR></TABLE>
His cr would be around 12.5 or higher with the ctr slugs and a mild mill?
His cr would be around 12.5 or higher with the ctr slugs and a mild mill?
if his head was milled he would have piston/valve contact and i think (so does skunk2) that the stage 3's are really only meant for super high CR. 12.5 is def not super high
dont get me wrong. the car is making awesome power. I am just curious
dont get me wrong. the car is making awesome power. I am just curious
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by simple4012 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">if his head was milled he would have piston/valve contact and i think (so does skunk2) that the stage 3's are really only meant for super high CR. 12.5 is def not super high
dont get me wrong. the car is making awesome power. I am just curious</TD></TR></TABLE>
read the post, he said hes using stage 2 intake and a stage 3 exhaust cam........... and as far as the compression, 12:5.1 and that cam setup should make for a good lookin dyno graph with some pretty good midrange power... cam timing is probably came into play heavily on the dyno huh??
all things aside thats good power for a 1.8 either way
where's the dyno sheet??
Miller
dont get me wrong. the car is making awesome power. I am just curious</TD></TR></TABLE>
read the post, he said hes using stage 2 intake and a stage 3 exhaust cam........... and as far as the compression, 12:5.1 and that cam setup should make for a good lookin dyno graph with some pretty good midrange power... cam timing is probably came into play heavily on the dyno huh??
all things aside thats good power for a 1.8 either way
where's the dyno sheet??
Miller



