Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jul 13, 2004 | 07:40 AM

loserface

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 327

Likes: 0

From: Los Angeles, Ca, Usa

Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump

Do you guys know which one is better or which one will have the longest lifespan?

Nov 22, 2004 | 08:04 PM

loserface

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 327

Likes: 0

From: Los Angeles, Ca, Usa

Re: Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump (loserface)

bump

Nov 22, 2004 | 11:56 PM

loserface

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 327

Likes: 0

From: Los Angeles, Ca, Usa

Re: Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump (loserface)

how about aeromotive external vs fuel sum?

Nov 23, 2004 | 04:55 AM

FOrSfEd

Member

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 3,719

Likes: 0

From: TurBlowVille, SC, USA

Re: Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump (slow poke)

I guess he meant a fuel sump

Nov 26, 2004 | 09:56 AM

loserface

Thread Starter

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 327

Likes: 0

From: Los Angeles, Ca, Usa

Re: Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump (slow poke)

oh yeah why is that.. yeah i think that is what i was comparing.. fuel sump and aeromotive external.. i am planning on making 600 whp and i didn't think my walbro 255lph HP could handle it consistently.

Nov 26, 2004 | 10:14 AM

FOrSfEd

Member

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 3,719

Likes: 0

From: TurBlowVille, SC, USA

Re: Fuel sum vs Walbro 255 fuel pump (loserface)

I'm glad I found this thread when you pm'd me I wasn't sure what you were talking about. U can use the walbro 255hp inline fuel pump with a surge tank and the factory fuel pump. That set up would be good for 600+whp. Do a search under surge tank and you can find a bunch of info. It's alot safer to use on a street car and you won't have any problems with clearence issuse's.