I would have to say a Mustang 5.0... it was a few days after I got my swap... I thought it would be harder, but I just pulled and pulled I had the biggest smile in the world.

 

best Kill would have to be a green Gremlin. it might not be fast. but i didnt think it would even try.

 

what engine ya got loud accord?

 

91 MX-6 GT turbo was the fastest car that I beat.

 

JDM H22a

 

97 3000 GT and a 89 RX-7 or 3 or whatever turbo

 

Viper GTS Coupe, twice.

Moron couldn't drive, stalled both times. Ah the joys of having an automatic. :D

 

hmm, any of the ricey *** civics or the v6 6th gen accord that i beat when i ran best time: 16.23 at 85... im a 96 coupe ex 5spd. with only intake.

peace

 

damn man, were you sleeping at the light?

 

mustangs, mercedes, type-r's and anything else slower than me on the track


morgan-who once again reminds you that driver means more than the car

 

Best kill? I once out ran a school bus. Thats after I floored it horrifically.

Yeah, thats about it. There is usually about 100 lbs of tools in the back of the accord so that usually slows me down. With no mods either.

 

what the hell are you guys talking about? what do you have in your accords? cause w/o turbo or forced induction of any kind i dont think you come close to a viper?, mustang 5.0?rx-7? and whats up w/ 16.3 or whatever. my ex gf's **** cavalier would rape you. sorry i want time slips or dynos

 

i was talking about on a closed road course where I have riden in Preludes that can hang with Vipers

 

Timeslips? Ugh drag racing is for children.

 

qoute[what the hell are you guys talking about? what do you have in your accords? cause w/o turbo or forced induction of any kind i dont think you come close to a viper?, mustang 5.0?rx-7? and whats up w/ 16.3 or whatever. my ex gf's **** cavalier would rape you. sorry i want time slips or dynos]

some of here are running h22's with FI like me and bigjames. 4doorh22 is a NA man, so he running super fast too.

 

Sorry buddy but beating a stock 5.0 is not super fast.

 

whats " FI " and " NA" stand for? haha

 

i dont understand why you ask if i was sleeping at the light. i run quicker than most 5th gen's with i/h/e... and im sorry i just dont understand why you said that.




peace

 

dude i don;t know what you think is fast. my friend has a jdm H22A in his 5th gen coupe that is stripped and has i/h/e and i dont think htat is too fast, so taking into consideration the weight of an accord compared too my friend civic i really dont think a H22A powered accord would be too fast. with "fi" and pushiing some lb's probaly, but i'm tired of hearing people say they beat this and that but then saying they have i/h/e in thier f@cking accord or heavy *** lude and a stock 5.0 runs low 13's and i do think thats fast for the cash they spent on it someone on ebay is selling a 95 gt w/ vortech supercharger, comptech ice box, etc. and they have a time slip running 10.2

 

that civic coupe is almost as heavy as my 4th gen sedan. ive wieghed my car at the dump, and it is 2700 with full sound system. on top of that, my car is not just i/h/e, and we arent saying we can beat a gt supercharged, we are saying we can beat a stock GT or 5.0. track racing is much different than street racing. and that GT stock cost more than my total car with the h2 swap and mods. ive probably spent a total of 5k on mine. that GT is well over 10k, so if i wanted to add a turbo, i would wipe that GT's ***.

 

Drag racing Accords is like cool and stuff, but Accords are really touring cars with a sophisticated chassis and suspension that when tuned, will give almost any sports car a run for the money on a closed circuit (especially with a H22 heh).
It is a substantial platform to build upon. Like it or not, Civics are econoboxes.

 

grrrrrrr....

 

you must be shitting me... hahahahaha you are a funny dood. do you even know what a stock 5.0 mustang runs? until you find out, shut the hell up. they aren't even into the 14s. when people say "fast", I never said that my car was "fast" but then again, nothing is fast... if a 5.0 is fast, and I can rip them a new *** hole, and I am not fast, that how does that work out. and for time slips, I do have them, but I will have to scan it. my 1\4 mi time was 14.847 @ 93 mph. and that was when I was all out of tune, with 17inch rims... full interior, and at a shitty track. so why dont you tell me what is fast?

 

2000 Ford mustang gt runs a 14.2 @97.8mph **** face and that is the 4.6 v8. so who are you tearing a new *******? thats came out of the scc issue where they compared the rustang to the itr by the way. dude i'm just tired of reading lame *** posts of people who run 14.847 supposedly beating rx-7's or supra's or stuff. great for you you ran a 14.8i can run that too in my 97 turbo civic w/o any problem in fact i run faster than that and that is slowwwww, so... thats not my point.. my point is why do people have to write posts where they make themselves to be something they are not. thats my point...don't take it personal oh and maybe the mustang wasn't a 5.0 are ya sure it wasn't a base stang?


[Modified by clean, 1:32 AM 11/20/2001]

 

you are one stupid ****... I said 5.0... if you knew anything... the new mustang GTs are not 5.0. you are not even worth my time typing. obviously you have no knowlege about cars, so go **** yourself.. and while you are at it, go look up what the 5.0 mustangs run.