All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

2.5 exhuast vs 2.25 on B16?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:35 PM
  #1  
B-B-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default 2.5 exhuast vs 2.25 on B16?

I have a B16 with CTR cams, Port and Polished head with bolt ons, stock bottom end and compression. Now my exhuast is 2 1/4 inches crushed bent. I was wonderin if going 2 1/2 inches would make that big of a difference and help out top end?

And also, I have a DC sports 4-2-1 one piece. A lot of people are saying this is a crappy header. What would be a good header for me? I hear a lot of good things about the ITR JDM 4-1 since it has a 2 1/2 inch collector. I know that ANR and all those other 800+$ headers are well worth the money but I was looking to spend about 300-500 on one. Any other headers out there that are pretty decent?

Thanks for the info guys

Matt
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:45 PM
  #2  
turbo'd's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Default

2.5" would probley be a little better, you wouldnt notice a huge difference, but you should definitally be flowing enough air to have sufficient backpressure for 2.5" pipes.

and for racing applications you should really make sure you get a 4-1 header, it will give you more torque.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 09:55 PM
  #3  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

backpressure has no effect on anything but a loss of power...no reason it should have been mentioned in this thread


a JDM DC 4-1 and 2.5" mandrel is a good street setup, and i just happen to offer a REALLY good price on the JDM's...just pm me
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2004 | 10:10 PM
  #4  
turbo'd's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
From: Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada
Default Re: (GSRswapandslow.)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRswapandslow. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">backpressure has no effect on anything but a loss of power...no reason it should have been mentioned in this thread


a JDM DC 4-1 and 2.5" mandrel is a good street setup, and i just happen to offer a REALLY good price on the JDM's...just pm me</TD></TR></TABLE>what do you mean it shouldnt have been mentioned? its has everything to do with it. A basic b16a doesnt need 2.5" pipes, if he was worried that 2.5" could be too big and he could not have enough backpressure. I was simply letting him know that with the work he has done to the engine, 2.5" would be fine.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:20 AM
  #5  
SiRGodfather's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 53
Likes: 1
From: Montreal, Canada
Default Re: (turbo'd)

Back pressure is a myth. Its all a question of exhaust velocity and the rate at which the exhaust gases cool. The faster the exhaust gases cool, the slower they exit. This slowing down affects the rate at which the exhaust gases exit and the path they take (exhaust velocity), and thus for lack of a better word, back-logs everything. As you increase the size of the piping you increase the rate at which the gases cool. Bigger piping is waranted if your motor has increased the rate at which these gases exit. 2.5" should be perfect for your setup.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:37 AM
  #6  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

^a very good post
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:56 AM
  #7  
Skeletor's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Snake Mountain,, Eternia
Default

Why does the backpressure issue come up in every single exhaust post?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 06:58 AM
  #8  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

because since the late 50's when it was first brought up.....it's been a VERY common myth. A lot of ppl still believe in it, and they pass that belief onto others.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #9  
94civicCx's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 760
Likes: 0
From: Dirt
Default Re: (SiRGodfather)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SiRGodfather &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Back pressure is a myth. Its all a question of exhaust velocity and the rate at which the exhaust gases cool. The faster the exhaust gases cool, the slower they exit. This slowing down affects the rate at which the exhaust gases exit and the path they take (exhaust velocity), and thus for lack of a better word, back-logs everything. As you increase the size of the piping you increase the rate at which the gases cool. Bigger piping is waranted if your motor has increased the rate at which these gases exit. 2.5" should be perfect for your setup. </TD></TR></TABLE>So..... 2.5 isnt necssary is it?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #10  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

it isn't necessary...but it's better
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #11  
B-B-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: (GSRswapandslow.)

So would it be "worth" it to get a 2 1/2 inch exhuast or should I not even worry about it?

Also, anyone have any input on my header thoughts?

Matt
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 07:55 PM
  #12  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

i mean, it's up to you

we aren't talking huge gains here...but in an n/a honda, especially a b16 (shiver), any gains are good gains and it just matters if those gains are worht it to YOU
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 08:32 PM
  #13  
B-B-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: (GSRswapandslow.)

I was also plannin on a pair of Skunk stage ones, so the bigger and better exhaust would do nothing but help out.

GSRswapandslow, you never gave me a price for the header?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 09:12 PM
  #14  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

$260 shipped
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2004 | 10:40 PM
  #15  
B-B-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: (GSRswapandslow.)

I take it thats ceramic?
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2004 | 07:31 AM
  #16  
GSRswapandslow.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

yeah
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #17  
crazyitr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX, USA
Default Re: (GSRswapandslow.)

I have a 2.5 inch T1-R exhaust on my b16.
When I dropped the exhaust and ran open header, I picked up 13whp.
Makes me think I should have got a 3inch.
Reply
Old Jun 30, 2004 | 11:42 PM
  #18  
Circuit Star-29's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 0
From: Searching...
Default Re: (crazyitr)

There is also a little thing called exhaust velocity which directly correlates with exhaust scavenging effect. The pulses of exhaust gas that come out of the primaries in the header helps pull the next pulse down the exhaust piping. On a four cylinder like ours, three inch's would be too big because the pulse of gases would simply deteriorate inside the tube. There is a plethora of information on exhaust efficiency and flow on this site...Search.

2 1/4 is fine for a street set. 2 1/2 is better for high power motors, and three inch exhaust on a four cylinder NA motor is just stupid unless its a Drag motor making 300 na hp.

And for the guy who said that 4-1 manifolds yield more torque...No, they don't.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 07:54 AM
  #19  
Ekasey's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Re: (nathan atwell)

1. 4-1 manifolds, don't always yield more torque

2. a good 4-2-1 header would be comptech (in your price range) Only stepped header mass produced. Great quality and the guys at comptech are nice ppl. If you are interested in comptech products please PM irev210 he sells them brand new in da box.

3. As exhaust pulses travel down the tube and arrive at the collector they send a negative pressure wave back. This pressure wave is then what aids in good scavenging. The controlled merge of the collector will reduce the severity of the pressure wave. Too severe can over scavenge the cylinder.

4. i think 2 1/2" would be too big. Your engine combination doesn't seem to be making the necessary power. Or have the displacement to need 2 1/2" worth of piping.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 08:17 AM
  #20  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: (eLusive ek4)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by eLusive ek4 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

4. i think 2 1/2" would be too big. Your engine combination doesn't seem to be making the necessary power. Or have the displacement to need 2 1/2" worth of piping.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I have seen WITH MY OWN EYES a 2.5" exhaust make power over 2.25" on an INTERNALLY STOCK B16A without losing power anywhere in the curve. From 4000rpm and up it gained. There ended up being about a 3-4 whp difference peak.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 08:30 AM
  #21  
Ekasey's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Re: (WAFFLES)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WAFFLES &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

I have seen WITH MY OWN EYES a 2.5" exhaust make power over 2.25" on an INTERNALLY STOCK B16A without losing power anywhere in the curve. From 4000rpm and up it gained. There ended up being about a 3-4 whp difference peak.</TD></TR></TABLE>

As have i, usually that gain in horsepower is making up for a header that isnt designed to that specific application

Example: too long a header, too big a header, too short of a header, not long enough of a header.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 10:50 AM
  #22  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: (eLusive ek4)

usdm dc 4-1 for the b16a engine was used.
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 11:25 AM
  #23  
Ekasey's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Re: (WAFFLES)

The usdm dc 4-1 header is designed to fit a wide rnage of applications it is designed to be optimized for one particular application. Your also delaing with a CARB header
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 11:52 AM
  #24  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: (eLusive ek4)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by eLusive ek4 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The usdm dc 4-1 header is designed to fit a wide rnage of applications it is designed to be optimized for one particular application. Your also delaing with a CARB header</TD></TR></TABLE>

not quite sure what you are saying here.

CARB header....yes
As far as I know, a 4-1 designed to fit on the B16 will not fit on the b18C engines because it will not clear the oil pan. I have seen one rub the oil pan on a lsvtec motor.( I wasn't quite sure if you were saying it should fit on all b series designs or what...please reiterate you point).
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2004 | 12:02 PM
  #25  
B-B-K's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default Re: (eLusive ek4)

Hmm. I dont know what to do. Some are saying it makes power and some arnt. Im puttin down 161whp with my CTRs and I was thinking of upgrading to some Skunk stages ones or some kind of stage one. Thought maybe the 2 1/2 would help me breath a lil better. Im also going to do a bigger TB and thinking on a intake manifold. My buddy has a B16 rex with a cheap intake and a Thermal R&D exhuast, its 2 1/2 and it pulls hard.

Best thing is prolly buy a 2 1/2 and dyno.

Thnaks for all the info though guys! Even though Im still confused

Matt
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:41 AM.