ok, if i were to buy an H22, and then bolt it up to my F22 tranny, i wonder, that would obviously mean longer gears right? or am i wrong, how does that work out? anyone?

oh yea, and these were the people i was considering buying the motor from, does anyone have praise or dirt about these guys?

http://www.japanstarmotor.com/h22a.html

thanks!

 

the f22 tranny will bolt onto the h22 block just fine. the only downside is the longer gearing. perfect for forced induction applications allowing you to stay in gear/boost longer before shifting. saves gas, too! the only downside i had when i ran this engine/tranny setup was the vtec-fallout when shifting from 1st to 2nd gear and 2nd to 3rd.

 

f22a tranny on a h22a is worthless, your not gonna get all that you can out of the h22a if you use the f22a (unless ur makeing serious HP).. Anyways what year accord is the h22a going in !?

*sig check* Hybrids are for homos'?


Do a search for " tranny tap or Tapping Tranny " you will need to tap the tranny so that the motor sits straights if your gonna use the h22/23 tranny on the h22a in a 90-93 accord btw

 

its a 1994 accord lx coupe, uhm, lets see, longer gearing, good for turbo, which i wont do, so basically its best for my to get the H22 engine and trans., that works.

My sig is directed to a particular person and of no consequence to anyone else, its an inside thing...

 

i would def go with an h23/h22 tranny. you will notice the difference

 

i think i also have the option of the f20b, h22r, and the plain old H22, or i can get some work done to my existing motor and maybe boost, but i dont know, what you think about boost, at least for big power gains? I own a supra, and that think is monstrous, but then, its not an accord, so i dont know...

 

hmm...mk3 or mk4 supra? i think boost is good when done correctly. i perfer boosting the f over the h for numerous reasons, #1 being the cost. i think tuning is often overlooked by most. i know a tuned f at 10psi will embarass a stock h in teh same car.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Confuc1ous &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> what you think about boost, at least for big power gains?.</TD></TR></TABLE>

edit: elaborate please. what kinda power are we talking

 

boost makes more power per $ that NA, but thats only if theres minimal prep work.....turbo + stock H = BOOOOOOOOM

 

mk4, as far as power with a turbo setup, im talking about 300hp +

 

300hp will most likely require you to build you inshmernals. lucky, i wish i had a mk4.

 

turbo and a stock h22a well tuned is gonna get you 300+ whp

 

owning an MK4 isnt all its cracked up to be, trust me, its expensive and once you start modding it out, driving it daily becomes less and less of a turn on, so its probably gonna be sold in the near future, and im trying to get one of these German cars with outrageous HP and super luxury...thats my best bet...

as far as building the internals, ****, ive been quoted minimal 2000 bucks worth of work just to add a turbo setup which will cost another 3000 or so, just so I could touch 300hp, so i dont think thats happening, i want to use an H22 as a base and then i'll go from there...this is too stressful!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by v4lu3s &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">turbo and a stock h22a well tuned is gonna get you 300+ whp</TD></TR></TABLE>
haha psh for how long? i would not try that one. ive always wanted a targa top poopra, even an mk3 would do. &lt;--headgaskets dont like to hold though. just for ***** and giggles.

 

300+ on an accord is not a cheap task, but you could definitely have a good deal of fun with a boosted f22 that is well tuned. that would be my choice if i only had the money....:sigh:...

 

dont forget, 250whp + FF = torquestear up the ***.......even though boost doenst hit untill ur actually going somewhat fast, itll still kinda suck

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by propwdialogue &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">300+ on an accord is not a cheap task, but you could definitely have a good deal of fun with a boosted f22 that is well tuned. that would be my choice if i only had the money....:sigh:...</TD></TR></TABLE>

werd bishes minus the down time by boosted f was teh funnest car i drove. i just didnt realize at the time downtime would kill me.
i just like taking it to the track and lining up against those light hbs and passing them with my chunky lady

 

turbo f is sooo much sexier than h22....but thats me.......

 

h22 swaps are just too common. thats why i started out boosted f first and will work my way h22 second after my f goes

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fw190bvi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dont forget, 250whp + FF = torquestear up the ***.......even though boost doenst hit untill ur actually going somewhat fast, itll still kinda suck</TD></TR></TABLE>

it doesn't suck it's actually fun - especially seeing your passenger's faces when your grocery getter accord starts torque steering HARD as boost kicks in! just hold the wheel.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by H22 CD5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the only downside is the longer gearing. perfect for forced induction applications allowing you to stay in gear/boost longer before shifting. saves gas, too! the only downside i had when i ran this engine/tranny setup was the vtec-fallout when shifting from 1st to 2nd gear and 2nd to 3rd.</TD></TR></TABLE>


The only benefit for longer gearing is gas mileage, thats it. It does not help at all in an FI setup

 

ok, gentleman, im getting some mixed signals here, but i think most people are thinking F22, over H22 with turbo, interesting, and the long gearing isnt all its said it is besides saving a bit on gas, i always thought the longer gears would be better for turbo, interesting...cool...keep it coming...lol, Evil Nick M, haha, awesome name!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fw190bvi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">turbo f is sooo much sexier than h22....but thats me.......</TD></TR></TABLE>

Then how much sexier is turbo h22?

 

i was wanting to do the same swap into my 92 EX mainly because the motor has over $1500 worth of oil leaks and i can get the h22 motor and put it in with the f22 trany for $1500 so what do you guys think? thanks

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by weezo182 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i was wanting to do the same swap into my 92 EX mainly because the motor has over $1500 worth of oil leaks and i can get the h22 motor and put it in with the f22 trany for $1500 so what do you guys think? thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>

you could do that. i dont see how you would even consider paying someone 1500 to fix a 300 dollar engine

 

here's a quick question, f22 in a smaller car like a civic? worth it since the motors are so cheap?