Hypothetical (maybe) Question
What kind of top speed would, say, an 88-91 ITA Civic/CRX see in the 1/4 mile?
Have any of you IT CRXen drivers actually run the 1/4?
Scott, researching.
Have any of you IT CRXen drivers actually run the 1/4?
Scott, researching.
Naws. 2 of the big ones. Talk to harry.... he can hook it up overnight from Japan.
If you are not granny shiftin and double clutchin, you'll have a 10 second car.
But if you even lose by an inch, you lost and you never had your car and you're definately not a real racer.
If you are not granny shiftin and double clutchin, you'll have a 10 second car.
But if you even lose by an inch, you lost and you never had your car and you're definately not a real racer.
Trending Topics
Funny you should ask...Larry Webster has a write up of what it takes to build an ITA CRX in the spring issue of <u>Car and Driver's Boost</u>.
http://www.caranddriver.com/boost
Here's a rundown of the test results (car has a 4.71 FD):
0-30: 2.7sec
0-60: 7.1sec
0-100: 21.0
1/4mi: 15.6 @ 89mph
If any of you would like, I have a PDF of the article. I just haven't posted it due to copyright concerns.
http://www.caranddriver.com/boost
Here's a rundown of the test results (car has a 4.71 FD):
0-30: 2.7sec
0-60: 7.1sec
0-100: 21.0
1/4mi: 15.6 @ 89mph
If any of you would like, I have a PDF of the article. I just haven't posted it due to copyright concerns.
My guess was "about 90mph."
So I'll give myself a prize later.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by emwavey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do I smell a 2005 Challenge car?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats a powerful nose you got up there. You can smell that? Even over the smells of New Jersey?
Scott, who already has everything but the chassis.
So I'll give myself a prize later.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by emwavey »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Do I smell a 2005 Challenge car?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats a powerful nose you got up there. You can smell that? Even over the smells of New Jersey?
Scott, who already has everything but the chassis.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Catch 22 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My guess was "about 90mph."
So I'll give myself a prize later.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Get some thin mints and set the Paula Abul collection on "repeat"
So I'll give myself a prize later.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Get some thin mints and set the Paula Abul collection on "repeat"
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Catch 22 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What kind of top speed would, say, an 88-91 ITA Civic/CRX see in the 1/4 mile?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I believe a former ARRC winner, the #60 OPM car, ran a 15.3 @ 92 (or 93) mph in the 1/4 at Atlanta dragway (Commerce) on dirt stockers a few years ago. This is with an lsd and a 4.7 FD if I'm not mistaken. I think that's pretty impressive.
I believe a former ARRC winner, the #60 OPM car, ran a 15.3 @ 92 (or 93) mph in the 1/4 at Atlanta dragway (Commerce) on dirt stockers a few years ago. This is with an lsd and a 4.7 FD if I'm not mistaken. I think that's pretty impressive.
I'm not sure how much faster an IT preped motor will be but my sts civic ran a 15.9 at commerce. That strip is supposed to be a good 3 tenths or so slower than most. I just added some lighter wheels and a crank pulley so hopefully I'll be going back when I get some time to see if it got any faster.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Catch 22 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Scott, who already has everything but the chassis.</TD></TR></TABLE>
As someone who has worked the Challange the last 2 years... if you want to do well, you better at least be in the 12s at the strip. The points system is biased towards the drag race rather than the autocross.
That's a lot of NAWZ starting from ~15...
Scott, who already has everything but the chassis.</TD></TR></TABLE>
As someone who has worked the Challange the last 2 years... if you want to do well, you better at least be in the 12s at the strip. The points system is biased towards the drag race rather than the autocross.
That's a lot of NAWZ starting from ~15...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Honda318dx »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bolt some slicks on the lude and you will see 12s...
Corey - who like hijacking scotts thread and tooting his HP horn...</TD></TR></TABLE>
put some slicks on my car and it will see 11's!!!!! boooo ya!!!
Corey - who like hijacking scotts thread and tooting his HP horn...</TD></TR></TABLE>
put some slicks on my car and it will see 11's!!!!! boooo ya!!!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PseudoRealityX »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
As someone who has worked the Challange the last 2 years... if you want to do well, you better at least be in the 12s at the strip. The points system is biased towards the drag race rather than the autocross.
That's a lot of NAWZ starting from ~15...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not really trying to win. More of an exercise in seeing if I can build a fun autocross car out of spares and junk lying around from the ITC car with a few ebay purchases peppered in here and there.
It appears that actually winning that event takes far more manhours and fabrication ability than what I have to work with. But I think I can put together something respectable. IF I can find a chassis that is somewhere in the neighborhood of *free.*
I have to claim a reasonable value for the stuff I already have, which shouldn't take me over budget, but I can't really spend much on the chassis.
As someone who has worked the Challange the last 2 years... if you want to do well, you better at least be in the 12s at the strip. The points system is biased towards the drag race rather than the autocross.
That's a lot of NAWZ starting from ~15...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not really trying to win. More of an exercise in seeing if I can build a fun autocross car out of spares and junk lying around from the ITC car with a few ebay purchases peppered in here and there.
It appears that actually winning that event takes far more manhours and fabrication ability than what I have to work with. But I think I can put together something respectable. IF I can find a chassis that is somewhere in the neighborhood of *free.*
I have to claim a reasonable value for the stuff I already have, which shouldn't take me over budget, but I can't really spend much on the chassis.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chad »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
put some slicks on my car and it will see 11's!!!!! boooo ya!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
11th motor?
put some slicks on my car and it will see 11's!!!!! boooo ya!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
11th motor?
These cars were high 15's in the high 80's stock, so I'm suprised thay ain't that much faster all race-riced up. Might have something to do with tire choice, despite short gears and a slip.
Actually, they were low 16 stock. 16.3 was about the average. It did not take much to get them into the 15's though.
My 15.0 was before I had a LSD though. I am betting the car now is capable of a high 14.
My 15.0 was before I had a LSD though. I am betting the car now is capable of a high 14.
Going back to the article, they've nicely listed test results from back in '88 as well.
'88 CRX SI (Tested 4/88)
105bhp/98 lb-ft (crank hp)
Curb weight: 2086
Weight distribution: 62.5/37.5
0-30: 2.8
0-60: 8.6
0-100: 28.0
1/4mi: 16.6 @ 82mph
Braking 70-0 mph: 176
Roadholding, 300-ft skidpad: 0.79g
'88 CRX SI (used, tested 12/98 w/ 116,000mi)
Curb weight: 2089
Weight dist: 62.9/37.1
0-30: 2.7
0-60: 8.8
0-100: 28.9
1/4mi: 16.7 @ 82mph
Braking 70-0 mph: 216
Roadholding, 300-ft skidpad: 0.75
'88 CRX SI (prepped to ITA specs)
141 hp/ 114 lb-ft tq (est. after obtaining front wheel hp at PowerCurve Chassis Dyno & Tuning Center, Sterling Heights, MI)
Acceleration tests: see above post
Braking 70-0 mph: 207
Roadholding, 300-ft skidpad: 1.04
Again, I've got the article if anyone wants to see it.
'88 CRX SI (Tested 4/88)
105bhp/98 lb-ft (crank hp)
Curb weight: 2086
Weight distribution: 62.5/37.5
0-30: 2.8
0-60: 8.6
0-100: 28.0
1/4mi: 16.6 @ 82mph
Braking 70-0 mph: 176
Roadholding, 300-ft skidpad: 0.79g
'88 CRX SI (used, tested 12/98 w/ 116,000mi)
Curb weight: 2089
Weight dist: 62.9/37.1
0-30: 2.7
0-60: 8.8
0-100: 28.9
1/4mi: 16.7 @ 82mph
Braking 70-0 mph: 216
Roadholding, 300-ft skidpad: 0.75
'88 CRX SI (prepped to ITA specs)
141 hp/ 114 lb-ft tq (est. after obtaining front wheel hp at PowerCurve Chassis Dyno & Tuning Center, Sterling Heights, MI)
Acceleration tests: see above post
Braking 70-0 mph: 207
Roadholding, 300-ft skidpad: 1.04
Again, I've got the article if anyone wants to see it.
Well, I based my reference timewise from the 86 Civic Si's I've had, both which ran 16.2-3's at 83-84. Weighed around 1950-1975. 91hp. A next gen CRX Si, with a little more power, but not much more weight should have been just a little bit faster both in time and trap speed.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blackgrrl23
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
Sep 28, 2004 12:14 PM




