Rear disc swap on the 88 - Suspention difference in the 88 an issue?
Topic says it all.
I know the 88 has different rear suspention then the 89-91, does this play as a important factor when swaping the trailing arm from a teg on there?
Or are the suspention differences not part of the trailing arm?
Thanks!
-Eric
I know the 88 has different rear suspention then the 89-91, does this play as a important factor when swaping the trailing arm from a teg on there?
Or are the suspention differences not part of the trailing arm?
Thanks!
-Eric
thanks man!
I have read that you can use crx e-brake cables, but there longer so you will have to route them 'creatively', is this true?
-Eric
I have read that you can use crx e-brake cables, but there longer so you will have to route them 'creatively', is this true?
-Eric
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by skelly ed6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No problems should arise.
The difference is the lower control arm. 88's are better IMO.</TD></TR></TABLE>
They also differ in the geometry of the mount to the body, IIRC. So even with the teg vs. CRX CA's you'll have a different attachment point on the 88's.
The difference is the lower control arm. 88's are better IMO.</TD></TR></TABLE>
They also differ in the geometry of the mount to the body, IIRC. So even with the teg vs. CRX CA's you'll have a different attachment point on the 88's.
no CRX (90-91 Si) ebrake cables are a direct bolt on. It's the 90+ teg cables that need creative routing because they are a little longer.
Re-use all the 88 Control arms on the new trailing arm.
Re-use all the 88 Control arms on the new trailing arm.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ryan Lantz
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
4
Feb 16, 2014 07:25 PM



