New times with Bunk motor
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,150
Likes: 0
From: Richmond,, British Columbia, Canada
New times with Bunk motor
surprisingly my R held up pretty good last night at the track
I was able to run a 14.5 @ 94 with bent valves in cylinder 2 and 3
R/T .572
60' 2.177
330 6.081
1/8 9.337
MPH 75.86
1000 12.135
1/4 14.523
MPH 94.07
and the weight of the car was around low 2400 with me in it and 1/8 tank of gas
I was able to run a 14.5 @ 94 with bent valves in cylinder 2 and 3
R/T .572
60' 2.177
330 6.081
1/8 9.337
MPH 75.86
1000 12.135
1/4 14.523
MPH 94.07
and the weight of the car was around low 2400 with me in it and 1/8 tank of gas
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: All Motor Sucka
Re: New times with Bunk motor (ringgold)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ringgold »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why were you racing with known bent valves? </TD></TR></TABLE>
that was my initial thought
that was my initial thought
OG triple OG
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 27,633
Likes: 2
From: Norcal
Re: New times with Bunk motor (ringgold)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ringgold »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why were you racing with known bent valves? </TD></TR></TABLE>
ahaha i thought bunk might have been an engine builder or somthing , i guess its just a custom fucked up one?
ahaha i thought bunk might have been an engine builder or somthing , i guess its just a custom fucked up one?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Boostage
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
6
Sep 19, 2005 08:32 PM