Hi all,

After having the H&R sport springs on my stock shocks for a little over a year now, everything is running fine, but I am a little unsatisfied with the way the car is sitting. I think I'd prefer if the front was a little lower than the rear of the car (it seems as though its sitting completely flat now). After talking to a friend about how to go about fixing this ... Koni Yellows and ground control sleeves were brought up as an option. Anyone have thoughts?

Thanks a lot,
Jon

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TypeR1558 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hi all,

After having the H&R sport springs on my stock shocks for a little over a year now, everything is running fine, but I am a little unsatisfied with the way the car is sitting. I think I'd prefer if the front was a little lower than the rear of the car (it seems as though its sitting completely flat now). After talking to a friend about how to go about fixing this ... Koni Yellows and ground control sleeves were brought up as an option. Anyone have thoughts?

Thanks a lot,
Jon </TD></TR></TABLE>

Why would you want the front lower than the rear? Are you more concerned with looks or the balance of the car?

 

Eibach sports sit the way you want.

 

If your only concern is ride height, GC`s are probably the way to go.

You`re still getting an Eibach Spring, so I`m happy

 

I like my H&R sports, and the way the car sits. I think its sort of an illusion. It looks more to me like the rear fender comes down lower, making the rear wheel look more tucked and therefore, making you think the rear is lower than the front.

 

When most Hondas are actually level, the rear will appear to sit a little lower.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I like my H&R sports, and the way the car sits. I think its sort of an illusion. It looks more to me like the rear fender comes down lower, making the rear wheel look more tucked and therefore, making you think the rear is lower than the front.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

the rear is, lower than the front.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Soup **** &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

the rear is, lower than the front.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Tom's right, H&R springs tend to sag in the rear once they settle.

 

I dont agree with any of you liars

Ryan, who will do some measurements when he gets home on his level garage floor.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by davidnyc &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Why would you want the front lower than the rear? </TD></TR></TABLE>

Maybe he's a redneck?

 

I would love to know also, im also running the H&R sport springs. Keep this thread up

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by davidnyc &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why would you want the front lower than the rear? Are you more concerned with looks or the balance of the car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Looks are what gets points at car shows

 

wouldnt you want the front to be higher than the rear? sorta how the eibach springs situate the car. (front higher than rear)