Newest Pics of King Tut's Si Hatch (19 pics, 56k have a seat)
Comments welcome on the car or my photography skills. Pics taken on a Sony DSC-P32 3.1 megapixel and sized down to 640x480 in Photoshop with no editing other than license plate. Enjoy:






































Probably going to go with the JDM thin side molding eventually. I had them ordered at one point, but A&J Racing didn't come though.
damn dude, you were just telling me the other night that you wanted those mirrors, and now here they are.... haha, you didn't waste any time. i'm jealous of your suspension!
Clean and nice.....what mods do you have? Is 175 right for an ls/vtec......just thought it would be a little higher? What tq #'s did it lay down?
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMSaint »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Beautiful car... but
on the mirrors. They aren't even proper knock-offs, the base makes the mirrors stick out at least 2 inches. Overall- great!</TD></TR></TABLE>
those are the DOT approved mirrors i think
on the mirrors. They aren't even proper knock-offs, the base makes the mirrors stick out at least 2 inches. Overall- great!</TD></TR></TABLE>those are the DOT approved mirrors i think
sweet pics.. suspension looks lovely..
question tho does your muffler or your piping scrape much? I need to reroute mine from over the control arms to under like yours but it looks like it will scrape bad?
question tho does your muffler or your piping scrape much? I need to reroute mine from over the control arms to under like yours but it looks like it will scrape bad?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMSaint »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Beautiful car... but
on the mirrors. They aren't even proper knock-offs, the base makes the mirrors stick out at least 2 inches. Overall- great!</TD></TR></TABLE>
The base sticks out further to make them legal, it adds about 25% more visibility.
on the mirrors. They aren't even proper knock-offs, the base makes the mirrors stick out at least 2 inches. Overall- great!</TD></TR></TABLE>The base sticks out further to make them legal, it adds about 25% more visibility.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The base sticks out further to make them legal, it adds about 25% more visibility. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm aware of that, I saw the post a while back when these were first introduced. They were still ugly back then, but I'm happy Tut keeps it legal. If you want stock visibility and stock legality, keep your stock mirrors.
The base sticks out further to make them legal, it adds about 25% more visibility. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I'm aware of that, I saw the post a while back when these were first introduced. They were still ugly back then, but I'm happy Tut keeps it legal. If you want stock visibility and stock legality, keep your stock mirrors.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMSaint »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'm aware of that, I saw the post a while back when these were first introduced. They were still ugly back then, but I'm happy Tut keeps it legal. If you want stock visibility and stock legality, keep your stock mirrors.</TD></TR></TABLE>
To each his own. Not everyone see's it as: stock or Spoon, there's other options out there.
I'm aware of that, I saw the post a while back when these were first introduced. They were still ugly back then, but I'm happy Tut keeps it legal. If you want stock visibility and stock legality, keep your stock mirrors.</TD></TR></TABLE>
To each his own. Not everyone see's it as: stock or Spoon, there's other options out there.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMSaint »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'm aware of that, I saw the post a while back when these were first introduced. They were still ugly back then, but I'm happy Tut keeps it legal. If you want stock visibility and stock legality, keep your stock mirrors.</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol "words of wisdom" by adam.
imo, they just look awkward. if you like them, then
I'm aware of that, I saw the post a while back when these were first introduced. They were still ugly back then, but I'm happy Tut keeps it legal. If you want stock visibility and stock legality, keep your stock mirrors.</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol "words of wisdom" by adam.
imo, they just look awkward. if you like them, then
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dr_jdm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
lol "words of wisdom" by adam.
imo, they just look awkward. if you like them, then
</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
To each his own. Not everyone see's it as: stock or Spoon, there's other options out there. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Agreed
. Cool JDM idea with awkward USDM styling! To each his own.
lol "words of wisdom" by adam.
imo, they just look awkward. if you like them, then
</TD></TR></TABLE><TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rodrez »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
To each his own. Not everyone see's it as: stock or Spoon, there's other options out there. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Agreed
. Cool JDM idea with awkward USDM styling! To each his own.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dohcVTEChatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Clean and nice.....what mods do you have? Is 175 right for an ls/vtec......just thought it would be a little higher? What tq #'s did it lay down?</TD></TR></TABLE>
All of my mods can be seen at the link in my signature including my dyno sheet. 134 ft/lbs is what I put down. Those numbers were from early last year before the cams and such. Heading back to the dyno very soon.
All of my mods can be seen at the link in my signature including my dyno sheet. 134 ft/lbs is what I put down. Those numbers were from early last year before the cams and such. Heading back to the dyno very soon.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hamB18C1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Clean hatch
Whats your plan for it next?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Got a Spoon TB and Skunk2 IM on the way. Then dyno tuning. Then 1/4 mile runs. Then CF hood and duckbill.
Whats your plan for it next?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Got a Spoon TB and Skunk2 IM on the way. Then dyno tuning. Then 1/4 mile runs. Then CF hood and duckbill.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JDMSaint »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Beautiful car... but
on the mirrors. They aren't even proper knock-offs, the base makes the mirrors stick out at least 2 inches. Overall- great!</TD></TR></TABLE>
They aren't really knock offs I guess. They are just some nice aftermarket POWER mirrors. Power being the key word. My stock ones were in pretty bad shape, so for $36 shipped I felt I couldnt' go wrong. I didn't know Spoon made power ones, and all the knock offs seem to have problems.
on the mirrors. They aren't even proper knock-offs, the base makes the mirrors stick out at least 2 inches. Overall- great!</TD></TR></TABLE>They aren't really knock offs I guess. They are just some nice aftermarket POWER mirrors. Power being the key word. My stock ones were in pretty bad shape, so for $36 shipped I felt I couldnt' go wrong. I didn't know Spoon made power ones, and all the knock offs seem to have problems.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cozmo2312 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">those are the DOT approved mirrors i think</TD></TR></TABLE>
They are DOT approved. Elegante by TYC is the brand.
They are DOT approved. Elegante by TYC is the brand.


