Witch body would you rather have for road racing?
An 88-91 CRX
or
94-01 Integra

 

The CRX is very competitive in a bunch of classes but that notwithstanding they're just more fun to drive I think.

 

Your results are going to be skewed by the fact that the post-94 Integra (non-GSR) is classified wrongly by SCCA in ITS. I would rather have that car in A where current standards say it SHOULD be.

K


Modified by Knestis at 1:17 PM 2/9/2004

 

Change the Integra years to 90-93. Thats my vote. HP over the light weight of the CRX. Makes for good battles as well.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by turfer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Change the Integra years to 90-93. </TD></TR></TABLE>


I also believe that the 90-93 Integra can put up a formidable challenge to the mighty CRX! The body is good looking, too.

 

A CRX SIR would be great, little low slung, and a b-series under the hood

 

I don't know Hracer, I would be very careful making such outlandish statements like that without any real knowledge of the situation.

 

ask ITAIntegraLS. He has an 92 LS and its one of the best ITA cars in Socal. The CRX has a short wheel base, its good in some tracks and it can also kill you in others. Be sure that your local tracks are good for a CRX.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hracer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


I also believe that the 90-93 Integra can put up a formidable challenge to the mighty CRX! The body is good looking, too.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I wish someone would buld/bring one of these in my region. Given the choices above, I think I already answered that question when I sold the ITR for the CRX

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by metalworker &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't know Hracer, I would be very careful making such outlandish statements like that without any real knowledge of the situation.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Oh yeah? Bring it on!

Travis, change your region to 003 and you'll see at least one out there that will be chasing after all the little terrified CRXs running away to hide.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Hracer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Travis, change your region to 003
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Okay, I'll be right there...

-travis, who doesn't mind being chased...it's the passing part that hurts

 

I think the operative phrase there is "will be chasing the CRX"

 

I voted for the "Intragra."

I think thats the 230hp double VTEC JDM market version of the US RS.

 

I also choose the 90-93 intgera. More HP Wider and longer overall better. And it does look 10000x better than a **** box CRX.

Sorry CRX guys Im hunting for you.

 

you must not know about the jdmhondaparts.com hybrid road race sponsored team of Andy Hope and Tom Liang

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by acydphryck &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you must not know about the jdmhondaparts.com hybrid road race sponsored team of Andy Hope and Tom Liang </TD></TR></TABLE>


OH trust me i know and i always have been ahead of one of them. You figure out who. Not to be bragging I like those guys they are kool. but I had to shut this guy up. HEHEH

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by acydphryck &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you must not know about the jdmhondaparts.com hybrid road race sponsored team of Andy Hope and Tom Liang </TD></TR></TABLE>

Hey look at ITAIntegraLS avator. In the back you see this little gold thing, yes thats Tom Liang in his B18 CRX.

 

...or even better, get th CRX's cousin, the G1 teg! Its the lightest of all tegs and shares many parts with the CRX.

 

The 90-93 teg has more simlar parts than a 86-89 teg. to a 88-91 CRX the suspension is almost identical. While the 86-89 is front torsion bar setup.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KaBlammyman &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">...or even better, get th CRX's cousin, the G1 teg! Its the lightest of all tegs and shares many parts with the CRX. </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 92 civic VX B18c &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Witch body would you rather have for road racing?
An 88-91 CRX
or
94-01 Integra

</TD></TR></TABLE>

In answer to the question "Witch body", http://www.teambodega.com/gall...a.jpg

 

Witch Body:

 

well, that was last year.

this is a new year and time for me to shut some people up. you guys figure out who. 'heheh'

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ITAIntegraLS &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The 90-93 teg has more simlar parts than a 86-89 teg. to a 88-91 CRX the suspension is almost identical. While the 86-89 is front torsion bar setup.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

The g1teg and the CRX share the same suspension (for the most part) they both have t-bars up front, with springs in the rear and a solid beam axel in te rear. The g2 tegs dont have any of these things, they have a fully independent rear and springs in the front and rear.

 

hey edik,

how bout you lend your car to your buddy itacelica for a couple races?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by KaBlammyman &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

The g1teg and the CRX share the same suspension (for the most part) they both have t-bars up front, with springs in the rear and a solid beam axel in te rear.</TD></TR></TABLE>

That's true for the 1st gen CRX, not 2nd gen.