difference between 4-2-1 and 4-1 headers
ive just always wanted to know the diff...is one designed for maximum torque and the other for high end horsepower? or what? what is better for my D16y8? 4-2-1 or 4-1? thx in advance
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NOSpeed97 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think this is what most people would say:
4-1 is better in the high-end
4-2-1 is better in the low-end</TD></TR></TABLE>
most common answer
4-1 is better in the high-end
4-2-1 is better in the low-end</TD></TR></TABLE>
most common answer
blaa not really true. if you look at DTR smp and other companies like that they all have 4-2-1. its all about which header you get not the style
Trending Topics
theres just sometimes where ya hafta say it....search, and if the info doesn't specifically pertain to your question, you'll learn along the way until you find your answer. tons of info on header designs.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by whoDAT »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think you need help in all dept. with your y8
j/k</TD></TR></TABLE>
ouch! lol i am aware...
j/k</TD></TR></TABLE>ouch! lol i am aware...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NOSpeed97 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think this is what most people would say:
4-1 is better in the high-end
4-2-1 is better in the low-end</TD></TR></TABLE>
this is the most common answer but is not necessarily true....... i've seen dyno charts where the dc sports 4-1 made more power across all rpms than the dc sports 4-2-1..........
4-1 is better in the high-end
4-2-1 is better in the low-end</TD></TR></TABLE>
this is the most common answer but is not necessarily true....... i've seen dyno charts where the dc sports 4-1 made more power across all rpms than the dc sports 4-2-1..........
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TeachHist2005
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
42
Nov 11, 2003 05:38 AM




