what kinda times you guess manage? (from NEW ZEALAND) dont see many go down the strip, infact only seen one, a 92 one did a 14.5!!!! horrible, my lude is quicker

 

Ick gawd, do a search in this forum. I keep forgetting his screen name but he's doing well into the 12's in an '02 (someone correct me on the year) with bolt-ons. I don't think that's typical though. I've heard of high 12's (you know, what 700hp Supras do ) and low 13's as the norm.

I'll post my times when the temp gets over freezing and the drag strip (which will be a drag/road course/AX track in the near future) is resurfaced.

 

Most of the tests by the major magazines come out roughly as follows for bone stock cars:

'91-94 5-speed NSX Coupe: 13.7-13.9
'97-04 6-speed NSX-T: 13.2-13.4
'97-01 6-speed NSX Coupe: 12.9-13.2

 

ah, http://www.vtec.net ran a 13.0 with a 2004 . Now thats how you drive

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99SiRacer &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ah, http://www.vtec.net ran a 13.0 with a 2004 . Now thats how you drive </TD></TR></TABLE>

No, more likely, that's because of a difference in procedures. For example, the magazines always drive a car bone stock, exactly the way it comes from the dealership, with a full tank of gas. They do this so that there is a standard procedure, and you don't have variables from having one car with a full tank of gas, another with half a tank, etc. And this is why magazine test times are usually extremely consistent from one test to another, which enables one kind of car to be compared to another.

Most folks who go to the dragstrip do so with 1/4 tank of gas or less, and empty out things like the spare tire and the took kit in the trunk, etc. As well as mods, of course...

 

11.5 @ 124mph. Nitrous Express kit. One dead cylinder. 80% compression loss on leakdown.

I no longer have it. owned the 91 since '97. got rid of it last year.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxlr8 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">11.5 @ 124mph. Nitrous Express kit. One dead cylinder. 80% compression loss on leakdown.

I no longer have it. owned the 91 since '97. got rid of it last year. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Now that is cool.

 

My best motoring vid "type R legend" says the NSX-R (not the new ones) did a 13.0 in the 1/4 mile! The base nsx did a 13.7

 

nsxtasy said the times perfect for STOCK nsx times.

 

Completely Stock. even less sticky than stock same size rear tires... 1.82 60'. 13.24@104.2mph. '91 5spd. Sea level. Houston Raceway Park.

 

There are lots of reasons for differences between magazine times and actual test runs. The most common one is, when most folks go to the drag strip, they empty their cars out of stuff like the spare tire and jack, and they make sure their gas tank is close to empty. The magazines leave all standard equipment in the car and test it at its curb weight, meaning full fluids. Those differences alone can make a difference of ~130 pounds, which can reduce 1/4 mile times by two to three tenths of a second.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxlr8 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Completely Stock. even less sticky than stock same size rear tires... 1.82 60'. 13.24@104.2mph. '91 5spd. Sea level. Houston Raceway Park. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Do you plan on swingin by the Supra meet in March? It's in Houston.

We usually stay off of the beltway down the street from Westheimer.

 

12.47@ 109 NA
11.4's@120 + with NX 100 shot

intake, haders, exhaust, and a weight loss plan (200 pounds)


Stock was 12.9's

2002 NSX T

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 02NSXU &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


Stock was 12.9's

2002 NSX T
</TD></TR></TABLE>

good stock time sub 13's stock first i've seen of just regular nsx.

 

I don't have her anymore. I might be there anyway to say "hi" to a bunch of old friends though.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nsxlr8 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't have her anymore. I might be there anyway to say "hi" to a bunch of old friends though. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Well, there is always a healthy mix of cars at the road race event and the nightly street racing.

 

my 93 did a 14.2

 

best motoring got 12.74 seconds (or something really close) in a new nsx type-s

 

yup, best motoring got a 12.4 out of the s-zero also

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JunIntegra &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yup, best motoring got a 12.4 out of the s-zero also </TD></TR></TABLE>

and is that STOCK??? very impressive

 

Stock NSX-S Zero did 12.48

Thas one fast car. NA too.

 

10.56 at 126.26MPH on twin turbo's and 150 shot of NOS.

Rob

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tt150nosNSX &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">10.56 at 126.26MPH on twin turbo's and 150 shot of NOS.

Rob</TD></TR></TABLE>
DAMN!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by H22A EG6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
DAMN!</TD></TR></TABLE>

I agree damn

 

yeah dude,
theres always the exception to the rule
and that guy that you saw that did a 14.5 obviously was either REALLY horrible at driving for some reason, or something was wrong with his car.

road&track tested out the nsx when it came out, and it ran a 13.8/13.9
something around there.

but definetely in the 13s

its not a 14 second car so stop worrying your little panties wet.