dynoed my 190000 mile gsr, i have aem intake, dc sports 4-1 header, and custom 2.25 exhaust to magnaflow muffler. compression check is 240-240-235-245
the dyno was a dynomite dyno. which guy said is around 15% lower then most dynojet dyno's, is this true, how do these numbers compare to others?

152 horse and 103 torque

is this good, i think i am pretty happy with the results seeing how it has the mileage it does

i put this in here seeings how im always in this forum and alot of eg guys have gsr swaps


have bigger pic of graph, just imagestation always makes it smaller

heres link to big version
http://www.we-todd-did-racing....D.jpg

 

Dyno numbers are going to vary from dyno to dyno and elevation to elevation (same with humidity and other factors).

 

If it's USDM, those hp numbers are pretty good...the torque is kinda lacking though.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Ricey McRicerton &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Dyno numbers are going to vary from dyno to dyno and elevation to elevation (same with humidity and other factors).</TD></TR></TABLE>

Same deal with those high compression #'s. Regardless, the dyno looks good, the link comes out as a blurr for me.

d

 

Thos look decent. I had a GSR dropped in a 93 civic ex w/ header, exhaust, intake, and msd and dynoed at 158whp and 125lb torque, similar

 

the HP # is good, but torque is

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EJ1_519 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the HP # is good, but torque is </TD></TR></TABLE>

and nice avatar....

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EJ1_519 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the HP # is good, but torque is </TD></TR></TABLE>

well thats what i was thinking, but it is also on a "mustang" type of dyno which usually have 15% difference with dynojet numbers, my torwque curve looks like most others, so im figuring id be putting around 170 hp to the hweels and 120ish torque on a dynojet, or could i be wrong, my a/f ratio is good if you ask me also

 

yea something is wrong with that torque if its not the dyno

 

The hp looks pretty good but i d/k about the torque. I have a jdm b16 in my 94 civic with i/h/e and im, and it put down 155hp 105 tq with timing retard 2 degrees and colder plugs for nitrous.

 

the usual percentage difference between dynojet and "mustang" type of dynos is between 10 and 15% if i were to multiply mine by that i would get roughly 170 horse and 120 torque, does that sound about right?

 

If you look at percentage that sound right but i dont see it putting down 170 to the wheels like that but you should get 115-120 tq. I have seen a stock type r put down 160hp 122 tq, then he put skunk stage 2 cams and valvetrain and made 195hp 137tq. In perfect weather on a different dyno i would say 160hp 117 tq somewhere around that.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHC_MShue &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea something is wrong with that torque if its not the dyno</TD></TR></TABLE>
Nope its a honda. haha jk

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by G20Balla &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Nope its a honda. haha jk </TD></TR></TABLE>


lol

 

do you have your secondaries wired up?

 

blame the low torque on age or the dyno brand, but the relative hp numbers are impressive. That torque curve just doesn't want to fall off; good header perhaps.

d

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by daver &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">blame the low torque on age or the dyno brand, but the relative hp numbers are impressive. That torque curve just doesn't want to fall off; good header perhaps.

d</TD></TR></TABLE>

so would a person with a 30,000 mile motor be happy with these numbers, or should i just because the mileage on mine, personally i forgot it was a mustang dyno when we went there and i said id be happy with 150, hell im really happy with 150 now seeings the type of dyno i was on

 

looks good to me, especially considering the age. hopefully i'll get that kind of longevity out of this pig sitting here.

 

BUMP

 

bump

 

bump for the avatar

 

Check my sig you should be considerably higher I would think. Must be the dyno??