tires for 225/50/16 or should i go 225/45/16?
Kumho Ecsta v700 $148

Bfg geforce T/A kd $159

Kumho Ecsta MX $104

Pontenza S03 $153

Im leaning toward bfg geforce T/A or the S03.
Reason being, I believe strongly the bfg can hold most of what i throw at it. and the side walls are to stiff or to soft.
S03s being higher ratings, cheaper, longer life.

Bfg geforce T/A kd $159

Kumho Ecsta MX $104

Pontenza S03 $153

Im leaning toward bfg geforce T/A or the S03.
Reason being, I believe strongly the bfg can hold most of what i throw at it. and the side walls are to stiff or to soft.
S03s being higher ratings, cheaper, longer life.
I am going with the V700's. I hear really good things about these tires and I heard they will last awhile too. I thought about the BFG's but they don't last long at all and are more expensive to replace if you have to do it every 5000 miles.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Big Phat R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Those sizes are large - you will need <40mm offset to clear those
225/40 or 215/45 is the correct aspect ratio for 16"</TD></TR></TABLE>
my wheels are 45mm offset
225/40 or 215/45 is the correct aspect ratio for 16"</TD></TR></TABLE>
my wheels are 45mm offset
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AamirCWITR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your looking at the wrong size tires,
205 45 16 or 215 45 16 or 225 40 16</TD></TR></TABLE>
how am i looking at the wrong tires..
those tires i posted, come in the following size 225/50/16
205 45 16 or 215 45 16 or 225 40 16</TD></TR></TABLE>
how am i looking at the wrong tires..
those tires i posted, come in the following size 225/50/16
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jordo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
how am i looking at the wrong tires..
those tires i posted, come in the following size 225/50/16</TD></TR></TABLE>
wrong tire size for your wheels... if you have 16's with +45 offset
you should get 215/45/16
how am i looking at the wrong tires..
those tires i posted, come in the following size 225/50/16</TD></TR></TABLE>
wrong tire size for your wheels... if you have 16's with +45 offset
you should get 215/45/16
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jordo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
how am i looking at the wrong tires..
those tires i posted, come in the following size 225/50/16</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jordo - the tires you a looking at are too big -
Use this : http://miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
<u>Stock tire size</u> = 195/55-15
Diameter is 595.5 mm Circumference = 1870.8 mm 535 revs/km
<u>Your new size</u> = 225/50-16
Diameter is 631.4 mm Circumference = 1983.6 mm 504 revs/km
Not only are they TOO WIDE and heavy. They are too tall and will give you a 6% speedometer error. They will also hurt acceleration.
215/45-16
Diameter is 599.9 mm Circumference = 1884.6 mm 531 revs/km
which is only a 0.7% difference
how am i looking at the wrong tires..
those tires i posted, come in the following size 225/50/16</TD></TR></TABLE>
Jordo - the tires you a looking at are too big -
Use this : http://miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
<u>Stock tire size</u> = 195/55-15
Diameter is 595.5 mm Circumference = 1870.8 mm 535 revs/km
<u>Your new size</u> = 225/50-16
Diameter is 631.4 mm Circumference = 1983.6 mm 504 revs/km
Not only are they TOO WIDE and heavy. They are too tall and will give you a 6% speedometer error. They will also hurt acceleration.
215/45-16
Diameter is 599.9 mm Circumference = 1884.6 mm 531 revs/km
which is only a 0.7% difference
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Big Phat R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Jordo - the tires you a looking at are too big -
Use this : http://miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
<u>Stock tire size</u> = 195/55-15
Diameter is 595.5 mm Circumference = 1870.8 mm 535 revs/km
<u>Your new size</u> = 225/50-16
Diameter is 631.4 mm Circumference = 1983.6 mm 504 revs/km
Not only are they TOO WIDE and heavy. They are too tall and will give you a 6% speedometer error. They will also hurt acceleration.
215/45-16
Diameter is 599.9 mm Circumference = 1884.6 mm 531 revs/km
which is only a 0.7% difference
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i dont thikn 215s are gonna hold 350whp+
Jordo - the tires you a looking at are too big -
Use this : http://miata.net/garage/tirecalc.html
<u>Stock tire size</u> = 195/55-15
Diameter is 595.5 mm Circumference = 1870.8 mm 535 revs/km
<u>Your new size</u> = 225/50-16
Diameter is 631.4 mm Circumference = 1983.6 mm 504 revs/km
Not only are they TOO WIDE and heavy. They are too tall and will give you a 6% speedometer error. They will also hurt acceleration.
215/45-16
Diameter is 599.9 mm Circumference = 1884.6 mm 531 revs/km
which is only a 0.7% difference
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i dont thikn 215s are gonna hold 350whp+
Jordo-
The shape of the contact patches will not be signficantly different between a 215 section width tire and a 225 section width tire.
The SIZE of the contact patch is determined by the weight of the car - not the size of the tire. This has been discussed on numerous occasions and George Knighton would be happy to re-discuss this topic with you.
If you seek better traction - more gains are to be had from selecting the right tire compound, a better LSD and traction bars if necessary.
Channelling 350 whp through the front tires of a FWD car is going to be a mechanical challenge anyway. Torque steer is going to be a major problem - along with getting all that power to the ground in an effective manner.
Bigger wider tires are only going to worsen torque steer.
The shape of the contact patches will not be signficantly different between a 215 section width tire and a 225 section width tire.
The SIZE of the contact patch is determined by the weight of the car - not the size of the tire. This has been discussed on numerous occasions and George Knighton would be happy to re-discuss this topic with you.
If you seek better traction - more gains are to be had from selecting the right tire compound, a better LSD and traction bars if necessary.
Channelling 350 whp through the front tires of a FWD car is going to be a mechanical challenge anyway. Torque steer is going to be a major problem - along with getting all that power to the ground in an effective manner.
Bigger wider tires are only going to worsen torque steer.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Big Phat R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Jordo-
The shape of the contact patches will not be signficantly different between a 215 section width tire and a 225 section width tire.
The SIZE of the contact patch is determined by the weight of the car - not the size of the tire. This has been discussed on numerous occasions and George Knighton would be happy to re-discuss this topic with you.
If you seek better traction - more gains are to be had from selecting the right tire compound, a better LSD and traction bars if necessary.
Channelling 350 whp through the front tires of a FWD car is going to be a mechanical challenge anyway. Torque steer is going to be a major problem - along with getting all that power to the ground in an effective manner.
Bigger wider tires are only going to worsen torque steer.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh really, this information is totally foreign to me. Im thought wider is better.
I cant find any tires in 215/45/16
The shape of the contact patches will not be signficantly different between a 215 section width tire and a 225 section width tire.
The SIZE of the contact patch is determined by the weight of the car - not the size of the tire. This has been discussed on numerous occasions and George Knighton would be happy to re-discuss this topic with you.
If you seek better traction - more gains are to be had from selecting the right tire compound, a better LSD and traction bars if necessary.
Channelling 350 whp through the front tires of a FWD car is going to be a mechanical challenge anyway. Torque steer is going to be a major problem - along with getting all that power to the ground in an effective manner.
Bigger wider tires are only going to worsen torque steer.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Oh really, this information is totally foreign to me. Im thought wider is better.
I cant find any tires in 215/45/16
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jordo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Oh really, this information is totally foreign to me. Im thought wider is better.
I cant find any tires in 215/45/16</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.falkentire.com/tires/az_rs_sizes.htm
Oh really, this information is totally foreign to me. Im thought wider is better.
I cant find any tires in 215/45/16</TD></TR></TABLE>
http://www.falkentire.com/tires/az_rs_sizes.htm
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by buji »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm pretty sure RE010s come in that size too.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes they do, and you can also get Michelin Pilot Sport in 215/45/16 but they are $$$$$$$
Yes they do, and you can also get Michelin Pilot Sport in 215/45/16 but they are $$$$$$$
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
LLCjr
Southern California (Sales)
1
Jan 2, 2009 08:31 PM




