DA chassis sway bar question
I would like to decrease the bodyroll on my car and am deciding if I should get both a front and rear swaybar upgrade from suspension techniques or if I should just upgrade my rear bar to help reduce understeer.
I am going to be a novice in some local lapping classes and would like to get my car handling as well as possible. I realize generally swaybars are somewhat of a matter of preference, but I am unsure if only upgrading the rear bar will leave the car having an uneven amount of roll.
Thanks
I am going to be a novice in some local lapping classes and would like to get my car handling as well as possible. I realize generally swaybars are somewhat of a matter of preference, but I am unsure if only upgrading the rear bar will leave the car having an uneven amount of roll.
Thanks
I have done a few track lapping events, I've already got H&R springs and tokico illuminas. I know how my car handles, I'm quite comfortable with it, however I find the car did roll a lot.
in your situation, adding just a rear swaybar won't affect your terminal roll angle much. a front swaybar will flatten the car out much more. getting real spring rates would help as well. 
nate

nate
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by solo-x »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">in your situation, adding just a rear swaybar won't affect your terminal roll angle much. a front swaybar will flatten the car out much more. getting real spring rates would help as well. 
nate</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well the car is still an occasional street driven car for now, so I'd like to keep the ride somewhat humane. From what you're saying, it seems that it'd probably be best to upgrade both?

nate</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well the car is still an occasional street driven car for now, so I'd like to keep the ride somewhat humane. From what you're saying, it seems that it'd probably be best to upgrade both?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by teg92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well the car is still an occasional street driven car for now.....</TD></TR></TABLE>
what's your point?
fwiw, stiffer springs may or may not increase ride harshness. bumpstops have an infinitely higher spring rate.
yes, you would probably be best off by upgrading both front and rear swaybars. the ITR is a wonderful donor.
nate
what's your point?
fwiw, stiffer springs may or may not increase ride harshness. bumpstops have an infinitely higher spring rate.yes, you would probably be best off by upgrading both front and rear swaybars. the ITR is a wonderful donor.
nate
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by solo-x »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
what's your point?
fwiw, stiffer springs may or may not increase ride harshness. bumpstops have an infinitely higher spring rate.
yes, you would probably be best off by upgrading both front and rear swaybars. the ITR is a wonderful donor.
nate</TD></TR></TABLE>
92 teg doesn't swap much with the ITR.
And FWIW, a daily driven car (if you want to remain somewhat comfortable) is gonna roll because you need to make compromises.
And I personally don't recommend big swaybars (esp rear) with soft springs. That's an accident waiting to happen.
what's your point?
fwiw, stiffer springs may or may not increase ride harshness. bumpstops have an infinitely higher spring rate.yes, you would probably be best off by upgrading both front and rear swaybars. the ITR is a wonderful donor.
nate</TD></TR></TABLE>
92 teg doesn't swap much with the ITR.
And FWIW, a daily driven car (if you want to remain somewhat comfortable) is gonna roll because you need to make compromises.
And I personally don't recommend big swaybars (esp rear) with soft springs. That's an accident waiting to happen.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Todd00 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
And I personally don't recommend big swaybars (esp rear) with soft springs. That's an accident waiting to happen.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you consider going from 14mm -> 19mm "big" and "accident" prone?
And I personally don't recommend big swaybars (esp rear) with soft springs. That's an accident waiting to happen.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Do you consider going from 14mm -> 19mm "big" and "accident" prone?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Todd00 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
92 teg doesn't swap much with the ITR.
.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually, I have ITR shocks and springs in my daily driven 90 Integra. They fit no problem and were cheap as hell.
92 teg doesn't swap much with the ITR.
.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Actually, I have ITR shocks and springs in my daily driven 90 Integra. They fit no problem and were cheap as hell.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by teg92 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would like to decrease the bodyroll on my car and am deciding if I should get both a front and rear swaybar upgrade from suspension techniques or if I should just upgrade my rear bar to help reduce understeer.
I am going to be a novice in some local lapping classes and would like to get my car handling as well as possible. I realize generally swaybars are somewhat of a matter of preference, but I am unsure if only upgrading the rear bar will leave the car having an uneven amount of roll.
Thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
Richie give Mart a call.
He has the same car as you and won SOLO this year and also daily drives her
I am going to be a novice in some local lapping classes and would like to get my car handling as well as possible. I realize generally swaybars are somewhat of a matter of preference, but I am unsure if only upgrading the rear bar will leave the car having an uneven amount of roll.
Thanks</TD></TR></TABLE>
Richie give Mart a call.
He has the same car as you and won SOLO this year and also daily drives her
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by emissionsux »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For the rears, didn't you have to run ITR control ams, since they are box type so you can mount the shocks?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes, Along with the front shock forks.
Yes, Along with the front shock forks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by emissionsux »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Will the bar also bolt to the stock control arms and end links?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well if you were using hte ITR LCA's....... i dont imagine it would be a problem.
http://www.g2ic.net is your friend - search it...
Well if you were using hte ITR LCA's....... i dont imagine it would be a problem.
http://www.g2ic.net is your friend - search it...
Nah, I'm going to be using stock DA LCAs. I don't want to go through another suspension. I've been through 3 different sets of shock and srong set ups. I'm finally happy with my Koni/H&R setup.
http://www.ground-control.com - order the GC upper mounts too.
Let me rephrase. You can swap stuff around, but you'll need a little fabrication to make some things work, or things won't retain the same geometry without sourcing other parts to make the R parts work.
For instance, front ITR shock into a DA will require the ITR fork, but this will make the front end sit about 3/4" higher on the same DA spring (and R spring, etc). Rear ITR shocks you'll need the ITR LCA.
That's how most of it is. Not nearly as swappable as a 92-95 Civic, that's for sure.
For instance, front ITR shock into a DA will require the ITR fork, but this will make the front end sit about 3/4" higher on the same DA spring (and R spring, etc). Rear ITR shocks you'll need the ITR LCA.
That's how most of it is. Not nearly as swappable as a 92-95 Civic, that's for sure.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by .RJ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ditch the H&R's and get sleeves and real springs 
450/600 worked nice, but needed more bar in the rear.... </TD></TR></TABLE>
Wouldn't those spring rates be a little stiff for the street? How about if i went 400/500?

450/600 worked nice, but needed more bar in the rear.... </TD></TR></TABLE>
Wouldn't those spring rates be a little stiff for the street? How about if i went 400/500?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by emissionsux »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wouldn't those spring rates be a little stiff for the street? </TD></TR></TABLE>
Depends on your what is tolerable to you.
Depends on your what is tolerable to you.


