My B20 nonvtec build
I need opinions. I'm debating on going vtec but I just want to hear what other people would do if they were in my situation. This is a nonvtec b20 that I'm working with. I want more N/A power. To name the main stuff:
JE 11.5 to 1 c/r 84.5mm(with a b16 head), eagle rods, z10 block girdle
Ls head milled .060, p&p, crower 404 cams and dual springs, skunk mani, type r t/b, a dc 4-2-1 header and some other stuff I'm sure I've left out.
My banger dynoed at 182 hp and 143 tq with an safcII. I have not taken it to the track yet so I don't know what it will run. Anyways I was wondering if I threw a relatively stock b16a head with type r cams on my built block if I would hit numbers higher than what I already have or would it not be worthe the hassle? I'm just looking for some opinions from experienced builders, thanks.
JE 11.5 to 1 c/r 84.5mm(with a b16 head), eagle rods, z10 block girdle
Ls head milled .060, p&p, crower 404 cams and dual springs, skunk mani, type r t/b, a dc 4-2-1 header and some other stuff I'm sure I've left out.
My banger dynoed at 182 hp and 143 tq with an safcII. I have not taken it to the track yet so I don't know what it will run. Anyways I was wondering if I threw a relatively stock b16a head with type r cams on my built block if I would hit numbers higher than what I already have or would it not be worthe the hassle? I'm just looking for some opinions from experienced builders, thanks.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20ek »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Anyways I was wondering if I threw a relatively stock b16a head with type r cams on my built block if I would hit numbers higher than what I already have or would it not be worthe the hassle? </TD></TR></TABLE>
im pretty sure you would make more power with the vtec head. back in the day HX_Guy had a setup similar to that except he didnt have a ported head. i think he put down mid 170's with an afc and the 404's with a non ported head but 150 or so tq. he then switched over to a b16 head with R cams and was workin on 200 hp. basically i think you have some more power to gain with a better header, like maybe 190/150 range and more tuning so i dunno, its up to you.
im pretty sure you would make more power with the vtec head. back in the day HX_Guy had a setup similar to that except he didnt have a ported head. i think he put down mid 170's with an afc and the 404's with a non ported head but 150 or so tq. he then switched over to a b16 head with R cams and was workin on 200 hp. basically i think you have some more power to gain with a better header, like maybe 190/150 range and more tuning so i dunno, its up to you.
I think I'm going to go the vtec route with hondata. That should get me in the 200hp range I'm sure. I've gone about as far as I can with nonvtec. The 4-2-1 header and 2 1/4" exhaust are choking me for sure. Thanks for the reply.
b20ek I am on the same boat like you. I have my B20z with full crower catalog and I am going to switch to vtec head with CTR cams. I am worried about the car being slower than right now. Currently I have ran a best of 14.2 (corrected) in a 93 Civic EX coupe on 14in street tires. No traction whatsover on 1st gear.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20ek »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I've gone about as far as I can with nonvtec. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i wouldnt say that
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20ek »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The 4-2-1 header and 2 1/4" exhaust are choking me for sure. </TD></TR></TABLE>
thats an understatement
i wouldnt say that
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20ek »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The 4-2-1 header and 2 1/4" exhaust are choking me for sure. </TD></TR></TABLE>
thats an understatement
::
::
Here is my rundown of what I am looking for, first is cost. I am straying away from a B18C1, and more towards the non-vtec realm. I am not so intrested in drag racing, in fact it kinda boars me. I do some auto-x, so boosting my current D16Y8 isn't a good idea. So I am down to two choices a B18B or a B20B/Z. Both of these are ~ the same in price. My questions is which is better for my situation. I am against the Vtec head swap, due to the avious rod/stroke issues with LS/B20 Vtech apps. So going totally non-vtec NA is what I want to do. After reading numerious dynos off stock and slightly modded 18s and 20s, the B20 seems to be a more impressive contender. However I am reading about its stock sleeves being a bit weak, how would this be a turbo issue and not a N/A issue? The block of the 20 is the biggiest problem that I am learing about. Besides that, are there any other issues? Would high comp. ratios in either of these engies be a problem, refering to teh 10.5-11 range.
::Here is my rundown of what I am looking for, first is cost. I am straying away from a B18C1, and more towards the non-vtec realm. I am not so intrested in drag racing, in fact it kinda boars me. I do some auto-x, so boosting my current D16Y8 isn't a good idea. So I am down to two choices a B18B or a B20B/Z. Both of these are ~ the same in price. My questions is which is better for my situation. I am against the Vtec head swap, due to the avious rod/stroke issues with LS/B20 Vtech apps. So going totally non-vtec NA is what I want to do. After reading numerious dynos off stock and slightly modded 18s and 20s, the B20 seems to be a more impressive contender. However I am reading about its stock sleeves being a bit weak, how would this be a turbo issue and not a N/A issue? The block of the 20 is the biggiest problem that I am learing about. Besides that, are there any other issues? Would high comp. ratios in either of these engies be a problem, refering to teh 10.5-11 range.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b20ek »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well I guess we'll never know for sure unless we try it.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Guess what? I tried it. I switched over to a 94 B16 head, CTR cams, stock valves and valvetrain, ITR intake manifold, ls throttlebody
, still using ITR header, straight pipe and greddy SP exhaust ran at the same track with the same street tires and it ran a 13.7 (corrected). I still need to get bigger injectors, fpr, a little tunning and some slicks. I can not floor it in first gear. NO TRACTION.
Guess what? I tried it. I switched over to a 94 B16 head, CTR cams, stock valves and valvetrain, ITR intake manifold, ls throttlebody
, still using ITR header, straight pipe and greddy SP exhaust ran at the same track with the same street tires and it ran a 13.7 (corrected). I still need to get bigger injectors, fpr, a little tunning and some slicks. I can not floor it in first gear. NO TRACTION.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XiOus271
Acura Integra Type-R
3
Feb 18, 2006 04:56 PM
NathanMorris
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
Dec 12, 2004 12:31 AM



