A few questions
I personally have never seen an LS with leather. As far as which car is better, they're within 5k miles of each other. It's your call. Whichever you think has been more properly maintained.
yes, LS's came w/ leather, it was optional on '97+ (maybe '98+) , don't think it was aval before then
and for the gs-r question, i'd go w/ the '95 because it's obd1 y0.
plus, it's the same engine and the '95 has less miles
and for the gs-r question, i'd go w/ the '95 because it's obd1 y0.
plus, it's the same engine and the '95 has less miles
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crawdad689 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
and for the gs-r question, i'd go w/ the '95 because it's obd1 y0.
plus, it's the same engine and the '95 has less miles
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree.
and for the gs-r question, i'd go w/ the '95 because it's obd1 y0.
plus, it's the same engine and the '95 has less miles
</TD></TR></TABLE>I agree.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crawdad689 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, LS's came w/ leather, it was optional on '97+ (maybe '98+) , don't think it was aval before then
and for the gs-r question, i'd go w/ the '95 because it's obd1 y0.
plus, it's the same engine and the '95 has less miles
</TD></TR></TABLE>
well i dont think 5k miles will make a difference when you're at the 150,000 mark. its which ever car was taken better care of as acuraholic pointed out. but obd1..thats true...from what i know, i'll go for the '95
and for the gs-r question, i'd go w/ the '95 because it's obd1 y0.
plus, it's the same engine and the '95 has less miles
</TD></TR></TABLE>well i dont think 5k miles will make a difference when you're at the 150,000 mark. its which ever car was taken better care of as acuraholic pointed out. but obd1..thats true...from what i know, i'll go for the '95
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EK SQUAD 425
Acura Integra
4
Jul 29, 2006 09:15 PM



