All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 07:45 PM
  #1  
Death from Above's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: outerspace
Default Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one?

which ones are better for b16 all motor power?
edit: which ones are easier to tune?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 08:59 PM
  #2  
riceball777's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,413
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (Transistor)

get ctr's
and if your willing to spend the money for sk stage 1's then get something that will give you more power like stage 2's
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2003 | 09:21 PM
  #3  
Stein's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 0
From: PDX
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (riceball777)

I disagree, unless you're willing to spend the money to build up your block, go with stage 1's, but, the CTRs are easier to tune.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2003 | 08:16 AM
  #4  
ej1civic's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,304
Likes: 0
From: WA, US
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (riceball777)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by riceball777 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">get ctr's
and if your willing to spend the money for sk stage 1's then get something that will give you more power like stage 2's</TD></TR></TABLE>

Skunk 2s wouldn't be worth it unless he wanted to go higher compression.
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 08:54 AM
  #5  
Death from Above's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: outerspace
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (ej1civic)

bump
ttt
Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 09:04 AM
  #6  
SAVAGE99's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
From: Santa Ana, CA, USA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (Transistor)

CTR- if u have a chance check out . TPR. issue2. they have a dyno comparison
ctr and skunk stage 2. good stuff chk it for ur self. then take it from there.


Reply
Old Nov 18, 2003 | 04:00 PM
  #7  
sander's Avatar
2.7(p/t)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,357
Likes: 1
From: Maryland
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (riceball777)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by riceball777 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">get ctr's
and if your willing to spend the money for sk stage 1's then get something that will give you more power like stage 2's</TD></TR></TABLE>

Comparing those cams is like comparing apples and oranges, They are just good for diffrent motors, you need higher compression to really take advantage of those Stage 2's

but as for the question at hand, i think a CTR intake cam even would do good with tuning.

-sander
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 06:44 AM
  #8  
CTR94Joes's Avatar
Junior Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, N Y, USA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (sander)

CTR's easy tuning. Sk2 stage1 ahh better off going with stage2 if you have high CR...
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 10:58 AM
  #9  
roadawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: North NJ, usa
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (CTR94Joes)


I am going with the s2s2 cams, I have a b16 with 10.2 CR and do you guys think 10.2 CR is enough to run those stage 2 cams.

I think the stock compression will be sufficient to run those cams. I know I will get more power with 11:1 CR, but I think I will still see good HP gains even with the stock compression.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #10  
smote's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
From: Albany, GA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (hybrid honda)

you are def. going to need more compression.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 11:38 AM
  #11  
SpoolnG2's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,193
Likes: 0
From: IL
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (hybrid honda)

i dont think so. i think u need 11.5-13 to see good gains with those cams. otherwise your just overcamming your motor.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 12:14 PM
  #12  
f@sth@tch89's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,946
Likes: 0
From: wEsT of WattS...NoRth oF CompTon, CA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (SpoolnG2)

i had a similiar thread going...will ctr pistons in a b16 w/ a gsr head...i think the compression would be 11.1-11.3ish...is that good enuff for skunk2 stage 2 cams?
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2003 | 12:22 PM
  #13  
Rob Dizzle's Avatar
Trial User
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,097
Likes: 1
From: Get Firefox, CA, USA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (fasthatch89)

the cams are just one important part of the whole scheme

stage 1's are really good cams. they can easily support 210whp with a good bottom end, and good flowing intake manifold, ported head, and header
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 04:22 AM
  #14  
1SlowSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (Manuel)

sorry to jack ur thread.
Which brings me to this. I am getting some CTR int/exh. cams put in my B16. I will be all motor for a few months, but going Turbo. What do you have to tune with an all motor car other than cam gears? i just want power without going to the dyno.. can i just advance the intake cam 2-3* and exhaust -1, and for sure make power? Im running an SI ECU (1999 Civic SI is the car). Thats probably the ONLY thing i can tune my self. If i just tune with cam gears with this, will i hurt anything? or do i have to change other things? thanks.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 04:31 AM
  #15  
b16vtecsol's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (1SlowSi)

every motor is different, if you're not goin to take it to a dyno then just leave the cams at 0 0
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 07:45 AM
  #16  
Skip01's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (b16vtecsol)

Not CTR but you get the idea.Not my car by the way.

Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 10:49 AM
  #17  
eyeamvic's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 599
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, Texas
Default

The S2S1's are more aggressive than the CTRs and don't necessarily require a compression bump. BOTH cams will both benefit from a compression bump. You will experience a loss in cranking pressure using both cams. I believe the inlet valve closes ABDC at the same degree on both cams. It all depends how much you're willing to spend. With the s2s1's you don't need to upgrade the valvetrain just like the CTR's, but it is recommended. Even slight valve float isn't very nice to your engine. S2S2's would definitely need the bump in compression to see them perform well, along with some tuning. Bigger the cam you go, the more tuning you'll need to do.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 10:53 AM
  #18  
BACKintheDA's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 5,169
Likes: 0
From: PA
Default Re: (eyeamvic)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Manuel &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">CTR intake cam and ITR exhust cam and skunk2 cam ger's tune it and you can get 10WHP to 14WHP on your b16A do you have I/H/E so like 10Whp and CTR&ITR cam 12Whp tunde ITR I.M. wet T.B. 5WHP B&m FPR you can ma ke 160 to 165 WHP on your B16A and run mide 14sec like 14.40 on street tire's</TD></TR></TABLE>

aren't the CTR/ITR exhaust cams the same?
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 11:12 AM
  #19  
Skip01's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,904
Likes: 0
From: Louisiana
Default Re: (DAsmurf)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DAsmurf &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

aren't the CTR/ITR exhaust cams the same?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I could be wrong but I think the CTR intake cam is a little more aggresive than the ITR.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 11:42 AM
  #20  
Combustion Contraption's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 10,170
Likes: 3
From: So Cal
Default

the CTR intake cam is a little more aggressive... the EXHAUST cams, which is what he was asking about, are the same though. same part # straight from honda as proof.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #21  
95 integra's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,952
Likes: 2
From: Birmingham, AL
Default Re: (LsVtec92Hatch)

You really need high compression(11.8+ to run the s2s2s), whereas you can get S2S1s and run on stock compression or 10.8 and still make more power then ITR or CTRs. The ITR/CTR are more like a half stage, the skunk2 stage ones are about as agressive over the ITRs as the ITRs are over the stock gsrs.
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 03:06 PM
  #22  
Grip's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,778
Likes: 0
Default Re: (95 integra)

s2s1's are the way to go...thats what im getting for my b16..right after i buy my itb's (1 week to go)
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #23  
BERT-O's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,802
Likes: 2
From: FL, USA
Default Re: Ctr Cams or Skunk2 Stage 1's? which one? (Transistor)



I pickup like 3-5 HP over CTR cams on my ITR motor. Mostly noticed in the midrange but tuning was a key to get them to make power.

The same ones are for sale now, have about 3-4 k on them.

Let me know,
Bert
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 07:24 AM
  #24  
Rollo Lawson's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,036
Likes: 0
From: T Dot
Default

*WARNING* B16's don't like big cams. i think CTR's are a very good choice for the 16, and, the added torque of the CTR's will help out the 16's small displacement. most people think that just because the b16 is designed to sustain high rpm, means it should be revved out of the roof. i've found good success with the b16, by focusing my attention on the lack of tq issue (ported p30 intake manifold really, really helped down low and in the mid). now, my 16 doesn't feel dead below 5K. CTR's, headwork, good tuning, good intake manifold and 8600rpm seems to work amazing for me.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2004 | 09:14 AM
  #25  
1SlowSi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,715
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach, VA
Default Re: (B16C1)

Just curious. I was looking at this web site and they dynos with various settings with the CTR's. The best results throughout the powerband were with +3/0. This was with a turbo. Will you still get good results with these setting in an all motor setup? or is it this totally different tuning? I may even try +3/-1 or +2/-1.. im not sure. With the settings of 0/+3 they had shitty low end and good top end. But thats another story.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:11 AM.