OT : New NSX in AutoWeek
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 12,092
Likes: 2
OT : New NSX in AutoWeek
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 1,278
Likes: 0
From: Largo, Fl
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (00MRSi)
that looks nice, but they are right that Honda needs to clean up the rear end a little. Cant wait to see a price on that, or maybe I missed the price.
scott
scott
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
From: Propaganda City, USA
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (zygspeed)
Rumor has it that the new NSX wont be coming out before 2006 (instead of 2005) cause the most of the europeans have ridiculous power figures that the NSX ("300+ HP) cant match. Honda engineers were reportedly "sent back to the drawing boards" in search of more power. I think I read it on vtec.net.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 2,550
Likes: 0
From: too close to Oklahoma
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (zygspeed)
A feckin' V6?
Did those imbecile Honda engineers have a brain tumor for breakfast? When are they going to learn that V6 engines are inferior and inadequate?
Must've been designed by the same douchebag who put strut suspension on the current Civic platform.
Honda sucks.
Did those imbecile Honda engineers have a brain tumor for breakfast? When are they going to learn that V6 engines are inferior and inadequate?
Must've been designed by the same douchebag who put strut suspension on the current Civic platform.
Honda sucks.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, Fl, USA
Re: (Fujiwuji)
It's funny they can make a K series that can bump out 200-300 whp NA with some boltons and internal upgrades, but are having a hard time finding enough power for the exotics.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 9,656
Likes: 0
From: Corona, CA, USA
Re: (nEoMuGen)
anyone see the other cars on there?
This one looks like *** but gets 94 mpg
But I do like the Turbo Miata they have on there, 178hp/185tq, upgraded susp, and racing harts
This one looks like *** but gets 94 mpg
But I do like the Turbo Miata they have on there, 178hp/185tq, upgraded susp, and racing harts
Don't call it a comeback
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20,968
Likes: 0
From: Greenville SC
Re: (SMZ GSR)
Absoloubtly Completely Amazingly ALL THAT, A BAG OF CHIPS, and THE DIP!
I like the way the cotpit looks like its advancing towards the front of the car. Amazing design lines. I bet that thing GETS DOWN in the turns...
Overall
I like the way the cotpit looks like its advancing towards the front of the car. Amazing design lines. I bet that thing GETS DOWN in the turns...
Overall
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 12,092
Likes: 2
Re: (nEoMuGen)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nEoMuGen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The originial NSX is still the best looking.</TD></TR></TABLE>
97 +
I don't mind the lightly bulging headlights and reshened face, but I NEED a 6 speed!
97 +
I don't mind the lightly bulging headlights and reshened face, but I NEED a 6 speed!
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,699
Likes: 0
From: Nutley, NJ
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (MK Ultra)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MK Ultra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A feckin' V6?
Did those imbecile Honda engineers have a brain tumor for breakfast? When are they going to learn that V6 engines are inferior and inadequate?
.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree. A V6 belongs in an accord, not a super car.
Did those imbecile Honda engineers have a brain tumor for breakfast? When are they going to learn that V6 engines are inferior and inadequate?
.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree. A V6 belongs in an accord, not a super car.
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: 818 sucka, CA, usa
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (MK Ultra)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MK Ultra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A feckin' V6?
Did those imbecile Honda engineers have a brain tumor for breakfast? When are they going to learn that V6 engines are inferior and inadequate?
Must've been designed by the same douchebag who put strut suspension on the current Civic platform.
Honda sucks. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i agree 10000%. either put in a turbo 4 or a mugen v8.
Did those imbecile Honda engineers have a brain tumor for breakfast? When are they going to learn that V6 engines are inferior and inadequate?
Must've been designed by the same douchebag who put strut suspension on the current Civic platform.
Honda sucks. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i agree 10000%. either put in a turbo 4 or a mugen v8.
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,430
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (Mr.Sha007)
If they opt a V6, it better be to the tune of at least 350hp to compete with the crazy hp cars of today. I dont know why they go for something more desirable like a 4 liter v8.
Member
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,902
Likes: 0
From: Life in the slow lane
Re: OT : New NSX in AutoWeek (Champ R)
Er....the NSX-R with the "oh-fecking-V6" still puts out mid 12 sec 1/4 mile performance. USDM NSX have low-13 sec performance. You all forgot about how light NSX is? Not to mention, this new HSC is even lighter.
Remember, this is a high-revving variable timed V6, not your everyday low-torque V6. What form of power plant does not matter, but the statistic of its performance. If it breaks 11 sec running a NA V6, it's a supercar in my book.
Remember, this is a high-revving variable timed V6, not your everyday low-torque V6. What form of power plant does not matter, but the statistic of its performance. If it breaks 11 sec running a NA V6, it's a supercar in my book.
