All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Lost Motion Assembly

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 03:03 PM
  #1  
sikcrx80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: O/S
Default Lost Motion Assembly

well i read Rockets post the other day and since my engine is out i want to change my LMA. now i was told that i should use type r LMA that it was better for big cams.

now then today i was told again by someone else that they are all the same..
im not thinking that is true. he said just to go buy new b16 ones.

How true is that?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 03:22 PM
  #2  
Big Teggie's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,319
Likes: 0
From: Umm..., NJ
Default Re: Lost Motion Assembly (sikcrx80)

What LMA's do you have now?

Look into sending them to RLZ, and they can modify them.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 03:26 PM
  #3  
Adam F's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 630
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx, us
Default Re: Lost Motion Assembly (sikcrx80)

the newer LMA's have a bigger contact area.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 05:03 PM
  #4  
Mr Hammond's Avatar
a/k/a Jomo
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,275
Likes: 0
Default Re: Lost Motion Assembly (Adam F)

Well the GSR vs ITR were tested and found little to no differences. Preludes can be had for cheaper then ITR"s.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 05:51 PM
  #5  
TodaSi's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,678
Likes: 0
From: Small Town,, Mi, U.S.A.
Default Re: Lost Motion Assembly (Mr Milano)

I've been running my 99 B16a LMA with big Toda B and Toda C cams and haven't had any problems. While the engine is down is this a necessary upgrade? Never really gave it any thought.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 06:42 PM
  #6  
sikcrx80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: O/S
Default

im running b16...
so the b16 ones are different then ITR and GSR right but they are the same...
anyone else know anything?
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 07:02 PM
  #7  
machine4321's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,475
Likes: 0
From: owen sound,ON, canada
Default

btw he is running crower stage 2 cams
there is about half an inch where the LMA'S are loose then it gets tighter
is there a way to check these to see if there in spec

Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 10:56 PM
  #8  
onepoint6i's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,050
Likes: 1
From: Single track SD
Default Re: (machine4321)

there is a difference between 1st gen lma's and type R lma's. there is like dunno 1mm difference in size from R lma's to 1st gen LMA's. i compared my 1st gen to my R's. you guys didn't read that this is why crower cams were breaking some time ago, cuz the lma's were seizing up from running the more aggresive cam profile. also in response to the 99Si LMA's they were revised and are the same as the R's. anyone can help me out on this one!!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 11:21 PM
  #9  
JDMb18civic's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 1
From: norcal, ca, usa
Default

i still have my stock gsr LMAs...
i have JUNs..
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2003 | 11:57 PM
  #10  
TwistedHatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Default Re: (JDMb18civic)

i was under the impression that the difference between the lost motion assemblies is that the type r ones were single spring, and all the rest were dual.......this was because the type r lma's were designed for higher rpm's. correct me if i'm wrong?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 06:46 PM
  #11  
onepoint6i's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,050
Likes: 1
From: Single track SD
Default Re: (TwistedHatch)

im guessing all lma's after 1st gen b16a lma's where revised. i dont know about the dual spring and single spring difference though.I would think it would be the other way around, type R have dual springs for higher reving and all other single springs. i was looking at one of my old ones through the bottom hole, it looks like they have only a single spring in there. ??
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2003 | 11:45 PM
  #12  
TwistedHatch's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Default Re: (1.6i)

the reasoning behind the single spring, was becuase it had less of a chance of binding at higher rpms
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2003 | 06:38 PM
  #13  
sikcrx80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: O/S
Default

im think im just getting some newer b16 ones.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bballchris24
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
Apr 2, 2008 11:46 PM
JDM808
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
4
Oct 2, 2007 05:56 PM
1mouatyme
Tech / Misc
5
Jun 2, 2006 06:24 PM
sporty240
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
6
Jul 20, 2005 08:49 AM
jspec21
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
17
Jul 10, 2003 04:01 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:46 PM.