68mm STR T/B too big?
I'm going to be running CTR pistons/ cams, portflo retainers, SS valves, JG Edelbrock intake mani, and that 68mm T/B. I got the T/B for 200 w/ new TPS sensor so I took it.... Now I'm thinking... how big is too big? Spoon makes a 70mm, but Spoon motors are much more radical than my motor... Anyone have any input on this?
Trending Topics
haha. spoon motors are not radical at all.... what motor is it going on? on a b16 it might be a bit much. on a built 1.8 or 2.0 it will work better
It's going on a B16a... I'll just keep it for when I do a turbo motor in the future. Ya know... after I spend the 4000 for ITB's and Stand Alone.
Anyone know any get rich quick schemes?
Anyone know any get rich quick schemes?
Show me the dyno charts...
The only reason I got the JG is because of the Improvement over the type R mani. I thought the skunk was just a type R knock off. But hell if I know... I just know what I"m told. Am I right?
The only reason I got the JG is because of the Improvement over the type R mani. I thought the skunk was just a type R knock off. But hell if I know... I just know what I"m told. Am I right?
the skunk is an itr knock off. i dont think you will see a power gain with that manifold and TB on a 1.6...
i know i had a power loss when i put the spoon 70mm TB and my itr manifold on my b16
i know i had a power loss when i put the spoon 70mm TB and my itr manifold on my b16
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by nmhybridog »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It's going on a B16a... I'll just keep it for when I do a turbo motor in the future. Ya know... after I spend the 4000 for ITB's and Stand Alone.
Anyone know any get rich quick schemes?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Let me get this straight. Your going to get Independent Throttle Bodies and then turbo your motor?
Maybe its just me but I think that ITB's is a waist when your going turbo (if its even possible).
Another thing. If your getting ITB's, why would you use the STR TB and the JG IM??
Anyone know any get rich quick schemes?
</TD></TR></TABLE>Let me get this straight. Your going to get Independent Throttle Bodies and then turbo your motor?
Maybe its just me but I think that ITB's is a waist when your going turbo (if its even possible).
Another thing. If your getting ITB's, why would you use the STR TB and the JG IM??
also the JG manifold is a bit to much for your set up ,you will benefit from it if you go turbo . an the spoon TB is not a true 70mm its tapper 70 but at the other end is 64 mm .Theres only so much that you can do with a oem unit. There are other TB that reach even up to 72mm outside and 70mm inside.
Oops, I'm not going to run ITB's and a turbo... I'll run the ITB's on my road race car, and use the intake mani and T/B for a street turbo setup. But I'll put then on the motor for now. I spent the money... might as well use it. \
I didn't think it was possible to run ITB's with a turbo... but I guess with the right plumbing and ECU, you can do anything.
I didn't think it was possible to run ITB's with a turbo... but I guess with the right plumbing and ECU, you can do anything.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Spoon1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">also the JG manifold is a bit to much for your set up ,you will benefit from it if you go turbo . an the spoon TB is not a true 70mm its tapper 70 but at the other end is 64 mm .Theres only so much that you can do with a oem unit. There are other TB that reach even up to 72mm outside and 70mm inside. </TD></TR></TABLE>
i always knew that the spoon TB tappered down, but i didnt think it tapered that much. wow. r u sure about that, cuz id really like to know.
i always knew that the spoon TB tappered down, but i didnt think it tapered that much. wow. r u sure about that, cuz id really like to know.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by importbeat »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">RB26DETT Nissan Skyline GTR has been ITB and turbo since 1989.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
WOW really?? That's really interesting considering tat the RB26DETT motor wasn't even invented in 1989
</TD></TR></TABLE>
WOW really?? That's really interesting considering tat the RB26DETT motor wasn't even invented in 1989
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CIVIC2 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
WOW really?? That's really interesting considering tat the RB26DETT motor wasn't even invented in 1989
</TD></TR></TABLE>
The RB26DETT is based of of the old 240Z motors. Its been around in one form or another probably longer than most of us (counter-
)
-edit-
Sorta
WOW really?? That's really interesting considering tat the RB26DETT motor wasn't even invented in 1989
</TD></TR></TABLE>The RB26DETT is based of of the old 240Z motors. Its been around in one form or another probably longer than most of us (counter-
)-edit-
Sorta
Yes in one form or another but do you classify all engines by the same engine code just because they are similar??
Are all b series motors identical?? Didn't think so double counter
Are all b series motors identical?? Didn't think so double counter




