what camera are you using?
I'm buying a digicam soon sooooooooo....
could everyone post up what cam they are using, what it cost, and maybe one pic or a link to some pics to show quality
could everyone post up what cam they are using, what it cost, and maybe one pic or a link to some pics to show quality
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jweller »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm buying a digicam soon sooooooooo....
could everyone post up what cam they are using, what it cost, and maybe one pic or a link to some pics to show quality</TD></TR></TABLE>
well the body i use is a canon eos 10d and the lens is a canon 28-135mm... i got a deal and a half on it... i got the body for $1200 compared to the $1500 retail and i got the lens for $400 instead of the $700 it retails for... it's a 6.3 megapixel as well... overall i couldn't be happier with it... sample pic below...
could everyone post up what cam they are using, what it cost, and maybe one pic or a link to some pics to show quality</TD></TR></TABLE>
well the body i use is a canon eos 10d and the lens is a canon 28-135mm... i got a deal and a half on it... i got the body for $1200 compared to the $1500 retail and i got the lens for $400 instead of the $700 it retails for... it's a 6.3 megapixel as well... overall i couldn't be happier with it... sample pic below...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by aLL STaR HYBRiD »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
well the body i use is a canon eos 10d and the lens is a canon 28-135mm... i got a deal and a half on it... i got the body for $1200 compared to the $1500 retail and i got the lens for $400 instead of the $700 it retails for... it's a 6.3 megapixel as well... overall i couldn't be happier with it... sample pic below...</TD></TR></TABLE>
well thats a bit more than I was looking to spend but I'm curious anyway. Is that a digital camera that uses the standard SLR lenses? It's got excellent pic quality
keep em coming people
well the body i use is a canon eos 10d and the lens is a canon 28-135mm... i got a deal and a half on it... i got the body for $1200 compared to the $1500 retail and i got the lens for $400 instead of the $700 it retails for... it's a 6.3 megapixel as well... overall i couldn't be happier with it... sample pic below...</TD></TR></TABLE>
well thats a bit more than I was looking to spend but I'm curious anyway. Is that a digital camera that uses the standard SLR lenses? It's got excellent pic quality
keep em coming people
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHC_MShue »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I use my digital video camera which takes shitty *** still pics
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Most DV cameras do.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Most DV cameras do.
Oh yeah i want to get my hands on a camera that uses Foveon X3 technology.
Those pictures that it takes are sssoooooo niiice.
check it out:
http://www.foveon.com
Those pictures that it takes are sssoooooo niiice.
check it out:
http://www.foveon.com
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lance Burkhart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Oh yeah i want to get my hands on a camera that uses Foveon X3 technology.
Those pictures that it takes are sssoooooo niiice.
check it out:
http://www.foveon.com </TD></TR></TABLE>
Are any cameras using this technology yet?
Those pictures that it takes are sssoooooo niiice.
check it out:
http://www.foveon.com </TD></TR></TABLE>
Are any cameras using this technology yet?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Are any cameras using this technology yet?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah sigma SD9 10.2M pixels
Their first camera was like $26,000.00 or something.
Are any cameras using this technology yet?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah sigma SD9 10.2M pixels
Their first camera was like $26,000.00 or something.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lance Burkhart »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Their first camera was like $26,000.00 or something. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I'll take 2.
Honestly...unless you're constantly developing poster sized digital pics, there's no reason to have that many megapixels. My 4.0 is already overkill...
Another samples of Canon power:

I'll take 2.
Honestly...unless you're constantly developing poster sized digital pics, there's no reason to have that many megapixels. My 4.0 is already overkill...
Another samples of Canon power:
I am using a Canon S30. 3.2 Megapixel. 3x Optical Zoom, 10x Digital Zoom. It's a nice camera for the price, but I am looking to invest in a higher-end "professional" digital camera soon.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b16a ferio »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I am using a Canon S30. 3.2 Megapixel. 3x Optical Zoom, 10x Digital Zoom. It's a nice camera for the price, but I am looking to invest in a higher-end "professional" digital camera soon.</TD></TR></TABLE>
You don't like the S30? What does it not have that a professional digicam does?
You don't like the S30? What does it not have that a professional digicam does?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I'll take 2.
Honestly...unless you're constantly developing poster sized digital pics, there's no reason to have that many megapixels. My 4.0 is already overkill...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
the 10.2 is dived by 3, cause 3 image sensors per pixel.
i think.
I'll take 2.
Honestly...unless you're constantly developing poster sized digital pics, there's no reason to have that many megapixels. My 4.0 is already overkill...
</TD></TR></TABLE>
the 10.2 is dived by 3, cause 3 image sensors per pixel.
i think.



Canon Powershot G2 user. 