headers
hey guys
i just bought a 2000 Civic Si/SiR, and i wanted to install headers that would give me the best output possible. i was jus wonderin wut ur guys opinion was on who makes the best headers. ive tryed lookin on the internet for info but couldnt find any.
thanx MickSiR
i just bought a 2000 Civic Si/SiR, and i wanted to install headers that would give me the best output possible. i was jus wonderin wut ur guys opinion was on who makes the best headers. ive tryed lookin on the internet for info but couldnt find any.
thanx MickSiR
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pho Real »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get ready for some replies that tell you it is HEADER.</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol , the best header for the amount that you pay is the 4-1 JDM ITR header .
also you have Toda , spoon , mugen and plenty more . I dont have the link at this moment , but if some one else dont post it i will "The great header test ". which will give you a good idea to compare different types of header
lol , the best header for the amount that you pay is the 4-1 JDM ITR header .
also you have Toda , spoon , mugen and plenty more . I dont have the link at this moment , but if some one else dont post it i will "The great header test ". which will give you a good idea to compare different types of header
wut kinda diff do headers make on an engine? like ive been told it increases torque on both low and high and increases the power band or sumthin like that
i know i sound like a dum face
but im curious
i know i sound like a dum face
but im curious
4-2-1 You get mid gains but little to no top end gain.
4-1 you get little to zero mid gains, but more top end.
Some will say a 4-2-1 robs power from the top and some say a 4-1 robs power from the bottom end.
Modified by Pho Real at 11:24 PM 9/4/2003
4-1 you get little to zero mid gains, but more top end.
Some will say a 4-2-1 robs power from the top and some say a 4-1 robs power from the bottom end.
Modified by Pho Real at 11:24 PM 9/4/2003
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pho Real »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get ready for some replies that tell you it is HEADER.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yup...everyone on this board is ****....but yeah pho real pretty much covered it....
Yup...everyone on this board is ****....but yeah pho real pretty much covered it....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by MickSiR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">are the stock manifolds on 00 SiRs any good , or would a performance header be way better?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well...there stock....thats why poeple upgrade
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well...there stock....thats why poeple upgrade
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pho Real »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Get ready for some replies that tell you it is HEADER.</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Pho Real »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">4-2-1 You get Low to mid gains but little to no top end gain.
4-1 you get little to zero low-mid gains, but more top end.
Some will say a 4-2-1 robs power from the top and some say a 4-1 robs power from the bottom end.</TD></TR></TABLE>
ehh kinda
4-2-1 gives more midrange than anything
4-1 gives high end
NOTHING gives low end except displacment.
4-1 you get little to zero low-mid gains, but more top end.
Some will say a 4-2-1 robs power from the top and some say a 4-1 robs power from the bottom end.</TD></TR></TABLE>
ehh kinda
4-2-1 gives more midrange than anything
4-1 gives high end
NOTHING gives low end except displacment.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kamin »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
NOTHING gives low end except displacment.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you know this
Stroke is the big one.
NOTHING gives low end except displacment.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you know this

Stroke is the big one.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by poison »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
you know this
Stroke is the big one.</TD></TR></TABLE>
without specifics, displacment in general
see thats why a 2.5L 6 cylinder is greater than a 1.6L 4 cylinder
you know this

Stroke is the big one.</TD></TR></TABLE>
without specifics, displacment in general
see thats why a 2.5L 6 cylinder is greater than a 1.6L 4 cylinder
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kamin »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
without specifics, displacment in general
see thats why a 2.5L 6 cylinder is greater than a 1.6L 4 cylinder
</TD></TR></TABLE>
But what if the 1.6 4 cylinder had more stroke than the 2.5L 6 cylinder?
without specifics, displacment in general
see thats why a 2.5L 6 cylinder is greater than a 1.6L 4 cylinder
</TD></TR></TABLE>But what if the 1.6 4 cylinder had more stroke than the 2.5L 6 cylinder?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by poison »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
But what if the 1.6 4 cylinder had more stroke than the 2.5L 6 cylinder?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
it probably does have more stroke than the rb, thats a relativley small displacment 6 cylinder engine hehe.
thats why its DISPLACMENT not stroke for torque
But what if the 1.6 4 cylinder had more stroke than the 2.5L 6 cylinder?
</TD></TR></TABLE>it probably does have more stroke than the rb, thats a relativley small displacment 6 cylinder engine hehe.
thats why its DISPLACMENT not stroke for torque
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kamin »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Im not a greater power, just correcting a slight mis-information
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Don't need anymore Mis-Info on here, that is pho sho.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Don't need anymore Mis-Info on here, that is pho sho.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Kamin »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
it probably does have more stroke than the rb, thats a relativley small displacment 6 cylinder engine hehe.
thats why its DISPLACMENT not stroke for torque
</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol. I was just trying to see if you would say something about the RB.
A bunch of fat pistons with no stroke and boost when the 1.6L has four long sticks. heh
Just playin with ya though.
it probably does have more stroke than the rb, thats a relativley small displacment 6 cylinder engine hehe.
thats why its DISPLACMENT not stroke for torque
</TD></TR></TABLE>lol. I was just trying to see if you would say something about the RB.
A bunch of fat pistons with no stroke and boost when the 1.6L has four long sticks. heh
Just playin with ya though.
here it is " The great header test" and it should give you some ideas
http://www.automotiveperforman....html
http://www.automotiveperforman....html


