stock ls 1/4 mile times?
honda/acura says straight from the showroom floor they are supposed to run 15.7's, i think thats bs seeing how i have a B16 head and an AEM CAI and only ran a 15.72@93
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B16OnTop »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">honda/acura says straight from the showroom floor they are supposed to run 15.7's, i think thats bs seeing how i have a B16 head and an AEM CAI and only ran a 15.72@93</TD></TR></TABLE>
with a 93 mph trap speed you should have been hitting LOW 15's....like a 15.3-15.1
it's all about the driver. 15.7 is very possible in a stock LS.
with a 93 mph trap speed you should have been hitting LOW 15's....like a 15.3-15.1
it's all about the driver. 15.7 is very possible in a stock LS.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fivespeedintegra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
with a 93 mph trap speed you should have been hitting LOW 15's....like a 15.3-15.1
it's all about the driver. 15.7 is very possible in a stock LS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
stock for what year? my 95 stock wouldn't run 15.anything.
with a 93 mph trap speed you should have been hitting LOW 15's....like a 15.3-15.1
it's all about the driver. 15.7 is very possible in a stock LS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
stock for what year? my 95 stock wouldn't run 15.anything.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by riceball777 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i would say mid 16's
i would not even consider a ls to be a 15 second car.</TD></TR></TABLE>
it has to be lower than mid 16's, because i didn't even launch and i pulled a 16.3. when i mean i didn't launch, i mean i really didn't. i revved to like 1000-1500 like you would on the street and just feathered the clutch like normal. had i launched, the time would have been better.
i would not even consider a ls to be a 15 second car.</TD></TR></TABLE>
it has to be lower than mid 16's, because i didn't even launch and i pulled a 16.3. when i mean i didn't launch, i mean i really didn't. i revved to like 1000-1500 like you would on the street and just feathered the clutch like normal. had i launched, the time would have been better.
Member
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Do I look like Michael Bolton from Office Space,, MD, USA
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fivespeedintegra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
with a 93 mph trap speed you should have been hitting LOW 15's....like a 15.3-15.1
it's all about the driver. 15.7 is very possible in a stock LS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
A stock LS traps higher then a stock GSR??? My GSR trapped at 90 mph...confused...
with a 93 mph trap speed you should have been hitting LOW 15's....like a 15.3-15.1
it's all about the driver. 15.7 is very possible in a stock LS.</TD></TR></TABLE>
A stock LS traps higher then a stock GSR??? My GSR trapped at 90 mph...confused...
your trap speed doesnt really have that much to do with your 1/4 time. its basicly just there as a nice extra piece of info...for instance you could accelerate faster from 0-60 but than not quite as fast from 60-100...and same goes for just the opposite. ive seen 2 diff GSRs run 15.42 and 15.43 but trap speeds were 95 for first and 90 for second...
i really dont think its that much of a factor.
i really dont think its that much of a factor.
2muchGT, The trap speed is a good bit of info, it lets the driver know if he/she is making power. I bet those two GSR's u saw one of them had alot better 60' time. Just my 2 cents.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




