What's the better cam for making midrange power, or is the sk2 better overall? I'm looking to make good power on my ls/vtec setup to 8500 or so, but maintain power in the midrange rpm band....

 

the CTR/ITR would be my choice... check out the cam Review on http://www.importreview.com

 

The stage 2's can make just as much mid range and are gonna **** on the CTR cams from 6,500 and up.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr Milano &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The stage 2's can make just as much mid range and are gonna **** on the CTR cams from 6,500 and up.</TD></TR></TABLE>
"****" on em..? i thought they would take a *phat load* on them.!!

 

http://www.importreview.com/re...R.jpg

 

im gonna have to agree, from that dyno the R cams are gettin pissed on

 

I was using CTR's before on my GSR motor, and then switched to stage II's. On the dyno, base run was 127lbs at the wheels with the stage II's as compared to 125 peak power on the CTR's after tuning.

 

Modified by dkim48 at 5:05 PM 8/28/2003

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crxman00 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">http://www.importreview.com/re...R.jpg

</TD></TR></TABLE>

anyone know the setup on that motor?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dkim48 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Those #'s are peak hp for a gsr?? What kind of dyno? I'm confused. Arent those #'s a bit low??</TD></TR></TABLE>

No. I didn't mention horsepower numbers at all. Those are torque numbers as stated in my original post. The Skunk2 cams did not lose any torque when compared to the CTR's in the midrange, I was quite suprised.


Modified by rodrez at 6:56 PM 8/28/2003

 

puhaha sorry I thought something was wrong

 

Thanks for posting that. I knew IB did a test. I was just to lazy to pull up the site and copy the URL and blah blah blah....