All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 06:04 PM
  #1  
2.2SICKLUDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: NoRCaL, CA, United States
Default Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2

My 2.2 has a milled head of .030(NA) and right now I have skunk 2 stage 1 cams. My head consist of Crower valvetrains, so I was wondering if its better to get the crower or skunk stage 2?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
SymphonyX's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
From: under a glass moon, ca, usa
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (JDMH22NLINE4)

go with skunk 2s. skunk 2 stage 2 cams (which i have) is 2 horse power less than jun 3s. but, its all depends on what you want to do.

just make sure your compression is high. since you milled the head thats a good start. you may want to look in to skunk 2 high compression valves and domed pistons.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 07:13 PM
  #3  
turbociv's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
From: buffalo, new york, united states
Default

I run crower stage 3's. It gives me a stock idle and Is a little more streetable. but skunk 2's dont really have a bad idle either though.

Im exactly opposit of you. I run all skunk valve train and have crower cams.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 08:19 PM
  #4  
T4eg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,784
Likes: 1
From: VA
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (JDMH22NLINE4)

Id go with ef-1 or Skunk2's. I try to stay away from crower.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2003 | 09:10 PM
  #5  
ranta18's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
From: Morton, IL, USA
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (BlueHatch00)

I have the Crower Stage 2's with basic bolt ons and made 200 whp. I haven't seen any Skunk2 Stage 2 or Jun 3's make that much.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 11:44 AM
  #6  
SergEK's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: South Bay, CA
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (ranta18)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ranta18 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I have the Crower Stage 2's with basic bolt ons and made 200 whp. I haven't seen any Skunk2 Stage 2 or Jun 3's make that much.</TD></TR></TABLE>

You havent looked around then.

Miguel made 205whp on JUN 3's untuned with an ITR motor and I/H/E...so now you have seen more with JUN 3's

Just saw you have an H22 correct..... 1.8L vs 2.2L....your H22 should be well past 200whp with cams just a thought
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 07:10 PM
  #7  
TheTruth709's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL, usa
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (SergEK)

skunk2 stage 2

i've seen alot of crower cams break, , i actually seen a post here on HT about it also
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2003 | 10:54 PM
  #8  
ranta18's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
From: Morton, IL, USA
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (TheTruth709)

My buddy has Jun3's in his GSR with jun header, aem typer cai, and exhaust and only made 175whp. I don't think the Jun3's would make over 200 with the h22. Check http://www.importreview.com. There are 2 with the Crower stage 2's that are 204-206 range. And some with the Jun3's that are less.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 06:53 AM
  #9  
blackeg's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,820
Likes: 12
From: schooling kids in ny, usa
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (ranta18)

go with the skunk. ive heard alot about crower cams breaking. also i think skunk tends to be more aggressive per stage- like skunk stage 2 is just about equal crower st 3, and so on...
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 09:19 AM
  #10  
2.2SICKLUDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: NoRCaL, CA, United States
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (ranta18)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ranta18 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My buddy has Jun3's in his GSR with jun header, aem typer cai, and exhaust and only made 175whp. I don't think the Jun3's would make over 200 with the h22. Check http://www.importreview.com. There are 2 with the Crower stage 2's that are 204-206 range. And some with the Jun3's that are less.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I've heard that w/ Jun cams, you need to run stock valvetrains to get the most hp out of it.

Man some of you guys are producing a hella a lot more hp than my setup with my setup. And some of you guys on;y have i/h/e WTF!
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 09:21 AM
  #11  
2.2SICKLUDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 342
Likes: 0
From: NoRCaL, CA, United States
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (TheTruth709)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TheTruth709 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">skunk2 stage 2

i've seen alot of crower cams break, , i actually seen a post here on HT about it also</TD></TR></TABLE>

some people said that the crower cams that used to break were the first one they produced but the new ones don't? any answer on that, or anyone the new ones and breaking it?
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 10:51 AM
  #12  
lcopas's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
From: corpus christi, tx, usa
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (JDMH22NLINE4)

Go with somthing OTHER than Crower ... I have Stage 2 Crowers in my B16B ... and I don't really like them ....

I going to try the Stage 2 Crane cams ... I think the will work better.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 05:04 PM
  #13  
F1Spec's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,128
Likes: 0
From: bay area
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (JDMH22NLINE4)

skunk2 stg2 PERIOD.!

i gained 18whp switching from ctr cams to skunk2 stg2 cams.
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2003 | 05:06 PM
  #14  
B00ST2nR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 7,465
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (s2geezy)

Skunk2 Cams
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 01:02 PM
  #15  
june's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 3,200
Likes: 0
From: Illadelphia, Pa., Usa
Default Re: Crower stage 2 or Skunk stage 2 (Skunk2nR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Skunk2nR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Skunk2 Cams </TD></TR></TABLE>
What compression are you guys running with your skunk2 stage 2 cams? I'm going with 12:1?
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 03:54 PM
  #16  
ProStreetImport's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
Default

My LS VTEC w/stock ITR pistons & stock B16a head NO mill stock ported throttle body made 204 whp on a DYNO JET.And our 2.0 12:8 comp LS VTEC made 242 whp on a DYNO JET. Keep in mind both cars made this power through the muffler w/Skunk 2's stage 2.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 07:42 PM
  #17  
Eibach95Civic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,484
Likes: 0
Default Re: (ProStreetImport)

anyone with d-series results..i would like to know too ..only for a d16y8 though
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 09:12 PM
  #18  
Yell88CRXsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach,, Virginia, USA
Default Sk2 stg2 gets my vote!

On my B16, I went from 179.4whp & 114.9lbs @ 8500rpm with ITR cams, to 190.0whp & 121.0lbs @ 8700rpm with Sk2 stg2 cams.

That's a 10.6whp bump, and both were tuned with a Hondata stg2.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2003 | 09:37 PM
  #19  
2.2EG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 715
Likes: 0
From: 209/702, USA
Default Re: Sk2 stg2 gets my vote! (Yell88CRXsi)

I just put Sk2 Stg2 in my car last week runs Ok , had to change my VTEC Xover though to 6200. taking it to the dyno friday hopefully I can get 180 to the wheels

Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 05:54 AM
  #20  
ranta18's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,581
Likes: 0
From: Morton, IL, USA
Default Re: Sk2 stg2 gets my vote! (2slow4U)

You guys have to remember that he has a H22 engine and not a B-series motor. The Skunk2 Stage 2's might be great on the B18/B16, but who knows on the H22. I haven't seen any dyno results with the Skunk2's, just Crower and JUN.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 06:11 AM
  #21  
SergEK's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,700
Likes: 0
From: South Bay, CA
Default Re: Sk2 stg2 gets my vote! (ranta18)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ranta18 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You guys have to remember that he has a H22 engine and not a B-series motor. The Skunk2 Stage 2's might be great on the B18/B16, but who knows on the H22. I haven't seen any dyno results with the Skunk2's, just Crower and JUN.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I would go with the JUN cams fo the H22 simply because they learned from their mistake with the first batch of B series cams. They also campain a 280whp H22 prelude for testing....I think they have researched their H22 cams for a while now...as far as their valvetrain I would measure bind height just to be sure as I would anyway...the last thing you want is piston to valve contact and valvesping binding/floating

In the end it will most likely come down to personal experience and testing....so maybe try them both out and see what your setup likes...or dont and always wonder
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2003 | 01:45 PM
  #22  
stupidfast's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
From: boise, ID, usa
Default Re: Sk2 stg2 gets my vote! (SergEK)

I personally saw a jdm h22 with i/h/e and jun3 cams do 195whp and 155ftlbs. Untuned with stock ecu.. Pretty dam impressive.. Id go with jun on this motor for sure.. If it were a b series Id say go with the skunks, same profiles as jun..half the price.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2003 | 07:04 AM
  #23  
dvp95's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,020
Likes: 0
Default Re: Sk2 stg2 gets my vote! (stupidfast)

Do you guys with the skunk 2 camshaft have any problems with it hitting things? This is what I read from crower.com

Note: At .500" valve lift retainer hits valve guide in stock head configuration.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2003 | 04:39 PM
  #24  
t72's Avatar
t72
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Default Re: (turbociv)

"I run crower stage 3's. It gives me a stock idle"

how the heck do you get stock idle with stage 3 hehe.
gimmie some tips
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2003 | 04:49 PM
  #25  
SilverEk3dr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
From: Tx, USA
Default Re: (t72)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would go with the JUN cams fo the H22 simply because they learned from their mistake with the first batch of B series cams. They also campain a 280whp H22 prelude for testing....I think they have researched their H22 cams for a while now...as far as their valvetrain I would measure bind height just to be sure as I would anyway...the last thing you want is piston to valve contact and valvesping binding/floating</TD></TR></TABLE>

If you look at the specs of the Jun cams for H22 & skunk2 stage 2's. The JUN cams only have like 10 thousandths less lift (like .496) and the skunk 2's are like (.505) and the jun's only have like a couple degree's different duration too. So for the price you getting a bigger cam for less. Makes sense to me...

I'm gonna get a pic of my stage 2 lobes...hang on..

alright

Just look at those mountains for cam lobes.




Modified by SlvrEj6Dx at 2:14 AM 9/6/2003
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 AM.