NHRA new all motor rules
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 231
Likes: 1
From: Syracuse, NY, U.S.
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,946
Likes: 0
From: wEsT of WattS...NoRth oF CompTon, CA
Re: NHRA new all motor rules (ChopTopSi)
All Motor
1. Vacuum pump and dry sump permitted.
2. Change minimum weight on FWD to 1,650 pounds. Decrease of 25 pounds.
3. Increase clutchless transmission penalty from 150 to 200 pounds. Increase of 50 pounds.
4. Effective January 1, 2004: Lower engine containment device mandatory.
Not enough of a weight break for FWD cars.
What is a Lower Engine Containment Device?????
My thoughts on the rule revisions...
1. Vacuum pump and dry sump permitted.
2. Change minimum weight on FWD to 1,650 pounds. Decrease of 25 pounds.
3. Increase clutchless transmission penalty from 150 to 200 pounds. Increase of 50 pounds.
4. Effective January 1, 2004: Lower engine containment device mandatory.
Not enough of a weight break for FWD cars.
What is a Lower Engine Containment Device?????
My thoughts on the rule revisions...
New User
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
From: NEVER FORGET
Re: NHRA new all motor rules (fasthatch89)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fasthatch89 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">All Motor
1. Vacuum pump and dry sump permitted.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
scott mohler just went 9's
1. Vacuum pump and dry sump permitted.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
scott mohler just went 9's
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,828
Likes: 1
From: Woodbridge, NJ, Middlesex
Re: NHRA new all motor rules (ChopTopSi)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ChopTopSi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what's everyone think of the new rules? 
http://www.nhrasportcompact.com</TD></TR></TABLE>
by reading, one would think there is a 75 lb advantage for the FWD drive cars when compared to the RWD rotaries, but in fact it's a 25 lb advantage for us and a possibilty that the RWD rotaries can cut even lower 60' times cause they're gonna simply take that extra 50 lbs and put it on top of the rear wheels for even better 60 foots ... and lower e/ts LOL ...
http://www.nhrasportcompact.com</TD></TR></TABLE>by reading, one would think there is a 75 lb advantage for the FWD drive cars when compared to the RWD rotaries, but in fact it's a 25 lb advantage for us and a possibilty that the RWD rotaries can cut even lower 60' times cause they're gonna simply take that extra 50 lbs and put it on top of the rear wheels for even better 60 foots ... and lower e/ts LOL ...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
