Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

b18's comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 22, 2003 | 06:19 PM
  #1  
bearboy80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, nc, usa
Default b18's comparison

what are the differences b/w b18b, b18c, b18c5? is there any site that comparing b18's? I heard that b18b is good for turbo and b18c5 is good for NA setup. That's about all i know.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2003 | 06:23 PM
  #2  
TrickHonda98's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 732
Likes: 0
From: If you make me mad, Ill Fling Poo at you
Default Re: b18's comparison (bearboy80)

acctually the B18C1 is good for turbo, I used have one.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2003 | 06:28 PM
  #3  
bearboy80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, nc, usa
Default Re: b18's comparison (TrickHonda77)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TrickHonda77 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">acctually the B18C1 is good for turbo, I used have one. </TD></TR></TABLE>
did you do the internal job? I heard that you can't boost as much as LS cuz the high compression. I dont have enough money to get b18c1 and internals.
Reply
Old Jul 22, 2003 | 06:36 PM
  #4  
allmtr's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
From: hehehe, STOP.., that tickles, usa
Default Re: b18's comparison (bearboy80)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bearboy80 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what are the differences b/w b18b, b18c, b18c5? is there any site that comparing b18's? I heard that b18b is good for turbo and b18c5 is good for NA setup. That's about all i know. </TD></TR></TABLE>
if u plan on building... then all are equally good for turbo or n/a..

b18b isnt better for turbo... its just safer cuz it has low compression stock. a b16 turbo would beat it, but not be as reliable as a turbo b18b.

as for n/a... b18c5 is built somewhat compared to th b18c1
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 01:59 PM
  #5  
bearboy80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh, nc, usa
Default Re: b18's comparison (allmtr: now at 95%)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by allmtr: now at 95% &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
a b16 turbo would beat it, but not be as reliable as a turbo b18b.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

Is that just because of vtec? or some other factor? I dont get how turbo b16'll get turbo b18. b16 don't have torque.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 03:00 PM
  #6  
JV's Avatar
JV
Who?
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default Re: b18's comparison (bearboy80)

The main differences between the B18 A/B, C5, and C1 are:

Intake manifold
Head
Valves
Cams
Pistons
Crank


All the motors you listed are capable of safely being boosted, given the right tuning. Tuning is key!!!!

The B18A/B just affords you a larger "margin of error" because of their lower compression.


Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 03:00 PM
  #7  
JV's Avatar
JV
Who?
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,910
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default Re: b18's comparison (bearboy80)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bearboy80 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

b16 don't have torque. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Boosted B16's do...

Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 03:33 PM
  #8  
Filliam H. Muffman's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Escapading on my Zepplin, CA
Default Re: b18's comparison (JV)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JV &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Boosted B16's do...

</TD></TR></TABLE>

haha you said it before i could.

diff displacements too b18b is something like 1801 CC's and c5 and the c1 are 1797.

people say the c5 is good for NA because of the high comp. pistons, slightly agressive cams, and the complete port and polish they have on the head.
and some other things to add onto that.

people like LS (b18b) because of the low comp. extra disp, and torque.
i personally dont favor the LS motor too much, like honda because of the variable valve timing and lift.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2003 | 06:05 PM
  #9  
allmtr's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,513
Likes: 0
From: hehehe, STOP.., that tickles, usa
Default Re: b18's comparison (bearboy80)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bearboy80 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Is that just because of vtec? or some other factor? I dont get how turbo b16'll get turbo b18. b16 don't have torque. </TD></TR></TABLE>
a b16 is faster than a b18b stock for stock... so why with the exact same upgrades on both wouldnt the b16 be faster??

with the same boost on each... and motors are both stock... the b18b is more reliable cuz it has less comression. it has nothing to do with vtec...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mike03,95civic
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
30
Sep 4, 2007 09:50 PM
92CivicSIRhb
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
14
Apr 28, 2005 08:50 AM
akinaspeedstar
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
Mar 1, 2004 09:16 PM
R.toCar
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
10
May 8, 2003 09:19 AM
90teg
Acura Integra
8
May 17, 2002 02:22 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:50 AM.