Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 05:02 PM
  #1  
SIReg9's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: macon, ga, USA
Default Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ?

Im the kit i bought i have 2.25" intercooler piping. Is there such a gain from 2.25 to 2.5" that i should i upgrade?

Also, im assuming the upgrade wont be worth it if my intercooler has 2.25 endtanks. Some one help me out. im new to the turbo game
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2003 | 08:46 PM
  #2  
SIReg9's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: macon, ga, USA
Default Re: Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ? (SIReg9)

bump
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 06:05 AM
  #3  
trbob16a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: washington, dc, usa
Default Re: Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ? (SIReg9)

you will gain absolutely nothing.

You may lose some mid-end spool up horsepower also.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 06:45 AM
  #4  
BROOD's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,018
Likes: 1
From: North/West, IL
Default Re: Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ? (trbob16a)

Stick to the 2.25" charge pipes that came with the kit, keeping it simple is best. Changing to 2.5" charge piping will not gain you anything unless the flow has increased quite aalot (upgrade to a much larger turbo).
If you were set on changing the charge pipe sizes the only changes I would make is on the Throttle Body pipe. You could transition from 2.25" to 2.5" at the throttle body opening. I'd run it as is though.
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 01:00 PM
  #5  
SIReg9's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 888
Likes: 0
From: macon, ga, USA
Default Re: Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ? (SLPR)

Ok...thats all i needed to know, thanks alot guys
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2003 | 01:07 PM
  #6  
ltho1998's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Default Re: Power gains from 2.5" inter piping vs. 2.25" ? (SIReg9)

From what i've learned in thermodynamics class:

By increasing the diameter of your pipe, fluid velocity decreases quite substantially. When you go from 2.25" pipe which has a x-sectional area of 3.97 sq-in, to a 2.5" diameter pipe with a x-sectional area of 4.91 sq-in, that's a 24% increase in area and that's also a 24% decrease in fluid velocity. Which means that air stays in your intercooler for 24% longer, and because the pipes should be nicely insulated, heat flow into them should be neglegible.

But also, since fluid velocity decreases 24%, you may also lose power from flow losses.

So my theory would be that because the air is cooled for 24% longer, it should be safer, not necessarily better for performance. But that's my opinion, what really happens is left for those who've tried it to find out.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
the.hamburglar
Forced Induction
7
Jun 26, 2005 11:56 PM
See Are X
Forced Induction
1
Jul 6, 2004 04:56 PM
JM Performance
Forced Induction
7
Jan 1, 2004 08:02 AM
Jared
Forced Induction
4
Jun 24, 2003 07:48 PM
blufke
Forced Induction
1
Oct 25, 2002 03:31 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:52 PM.