1/4 mile times for FI s2k
saw a supercharged sk2 run a 14.8 yesterday. Thats the only one i've seen. He definately couldn't drive because he should have been putting up better numbers.
the main problem with the supercharger is traction....1st-3rd the rear end looses traction very easy...also people w/ superchargers dont try to launch their car very hard because of the weak stock differential cuz they dont want to blow it or do a crazy burnout...good times from a S/C'd s2k should be around mid to low 13's...
Trending Topics
Well if they are trying to launch at a high RPM then I am not surprised. With a supercharger you would want to launch it a little lower. Let the power come in kind of gradually with the supercharger.
I think it comes to down to the tires. I'm stock and the 225 s-02's launch fine for me, but I can tell they're about to let go (as they do occasionally). throwing a supercharger on that would get me in trouble. I'd say a new clutch, rear end and some 245 slicks and you could be in the 12's.
13.8 could of been his shittiest of all runs all day, 2.8 60 ft missing 3rd and 4th, with nitrous and a supercharger there is no way that car, even if launched extremely shitty will only run a 13.8 granted that he did use nos too.
Guest
Posts: n/a
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by jolt-tsp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think it comes to down to the tires. I'm stock and the 225 s-02's launch fine for me, but I can tell they're about to let go (as they do occasionally). throwing a supercharger on that would get me in trouble. I'd say a new clutch, rear end and some 245 slicks and you could be in the 12's.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Easily...but rearends are hard to build for this car. I've asked the question several times on how to build up the rearend and it costs major $$$. Wish Honda would strengthen the stock rearend for 04...
Easily...but rearends are hard to build for this car. I've asked the question several times on how to build up the rearend and it costs major $$$. Wish Honda would strengthen the stock rearend for 04...
Definitely, it's one of a few reasons why I'm spending the bucks making my civic a mad machine of SPEEEEDSSS instead of my s2k, parts just aren't as previlent. I'm sure after a while someone will give us a nice cost effective rear.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by oos2kfan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Maybe we could just weld a ford 9 inch back there? haha who cares about ride quality right? jk</TD></TR></TABLE>
I agree! I mean, c'mon, ride quality...that ****'s overrated anyway.
I agree! I mean, c'mon, ride quality...that ****'s overrated anyway.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chuckd05 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">13.8 could of been his shittiest of all runs all day, 2.8 60 ft missing 3rd and 4th, with nitrous and a supercharger there is no way that car, even if launched extremely shitty will only run a 13.8 granted that he did use nos too.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Im not trying to bash but man 13.8 with blower and nos? doesnt that seem slow to you guys?
Im not trying to bash but man 13.8 with blower and nos? doesnt that seem slow to you guys?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cramerox »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Im not trying to bash but man 13.8 with blower and nos? doesnt that seem slow to you guys?</TD></TR></TABLE>\\
hell yeah man. when a bone stock s2k can run 13.8, you know something is wrong.
Im not trying to bash but man 13.8 with blower and nos? doesnt that seem slow to you guys?</TD></TR></TABLE>\\
hell yeah man. when a bone stock s2k can run 13.8, you know something is wrong.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BoostedH23a1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol.. all that money to loose 8 tenths..</TD></TR></TABLE>
lol
lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




