Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2003 | 11:54 PM
  #1  
fujio001's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: San Fransisco, CA
Default AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY?

I installed a generic 3" Short Ram with a K&N Fiter on the end. Makes a nice noise but it seems that the acceleration and torque are lacking from 2000-4000. I spend a bunch of time driving in those RPM ranges.

I have adjusted how far the filter is on the end of the tube and how tight all the clamps.

Is the intake just too big? Is it the fact it is a short ram? Do I need more fuel via adjustable fuel pump?

After I installed it, I disconnected my battery, started the engine and let it idle and stoped the engine, then started again. Probably not that useful

This is my first mod, any suggestions?
Reply
Old May 29, 2003 | 11:56 PM
  #2  
xteg95's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,691
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (fujio001)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fujio001 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
This is my first mod, any suggestions?</TD></TR></TABLE>

An intake isn't meant as a huge power gain, if you are looking to help your 2-4000k range get a some headers and exhaust and it will feel a lot better. You have a gsr or ls?
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 12:09 AM
  #3  
King_j's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
From: Minneapolis
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (xintegra01)

are you trying to say that a short ram with k&n filter makes less power then the stock airbox with resonator? and this is according to the *** dyno?
hmmm, ive noticed that on k&n filters, the front or top of the filter is "closed". or it does not have filter material there(hard to explain) anyway, on a short ram, the top/front of the filter is facing the front of the car and this is where the air is directly drawn into the intake tube, but because the k&n filter has a closed top/front, this might be the reason.
i have a generic shorty as well, mines not 3", but it does have a open front/top filter. so when im driving there is direct air flow intot he intake pipe.
but then again, the intake is there for like 5 hp gain. so dont expect anyhting major, and this is your first mod. do an exhaust next aand see where your car stands.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 12:57 AM
  #4  
integraL's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,746
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA, USA
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (King_j)

aww i was just about to buy an AEM short ram. will the brands make a difference?
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
NightRiderS2K's Avatar
In-N-Out Burger
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 5,424
Likes: 0
From: 1320ft OC LA, XX, USA
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (fujio001)

What car do you drive again?

A GSR or lower...it doesn't really matter at this point. The matter of fact is, you probably did lose power than gain one from the INCORRECTLY sized diameter of the intake. In this case bigger doesn't mean better. You gotta trust me on this one.

Think about it...for Type-Rs most big brand name companies use 3" diameter intake piping, whereas for GSRs and other models, they use 2.5" diameter or smaller intake piping.

just my 02.
cheers.
NRG
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 01:20 AM
  #6  
xteg95's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,691
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (2001gsRguy)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2001gsRguy &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">aww i was just about to buy an AEM short ram. will the brands make a difference?</TD></TR></TABLE>

brands dont matter, just get a good filter, there are thouands of threads of comparisons of intake manufacturers...just search and you will find your answers.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 04:45 AM
  #7  
Rory Breaker's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,805
Likes: 1
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (fujio001)

What doesnt matter is the butt dyno. Totally inaccurate. You could have gained power...if you really want to find out, take it to a dyno.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 05:33 AM
  #8  
IntEGNYC's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 8,136
Likes: 3
From: New York, NY, USA
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (newgsrdriver)

Let me add to the previous statement. Brands dont matter when it comes to short ram intakes. They do however when it comes to the Cold Air Intakes. The piping and fit of the tube is different with the various manufacturers. By experience, the inexpensive CAI's on ebay wont offer the exacting OEM like fit that an AEM or Injen CAI pipe will.

Short rams are fairly straight forward and are pretty much the same all around.

EDIT Typos
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 05:45 AM
  #9  
PatrickGSR94's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Active Streak: 60 Days
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 30,025
Likes: 59
From: Nowhere and Everywhere
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (fujio001)

Did you all think maybe it because the filter is sucking in HOT underhood air? Hot air is less dense than cool air. My K&N inside my stock airbox draws from behind the turn signal, feels nice.
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 07:27 AM
  #10  
Rory Breaker's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 7,805
Likes: 1
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (PatrickGSR94)

Not always....heres some interesting info:

https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=1
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 07:11 PM
  #11  
fujio001's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: San Fransisco, CA
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (NightRider-gsR)

I drive a 98' LS
Reply
Old May 30, 2003 | 07:54 PM
  #12  
Komsomol's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: niagara region, ON, Canada
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (fujio001)

Okay i've been through this.
You gain higher end horsepower but lose low end torque with a short ram intake.
With a standard vtec...


On an automatic you totally lose. There is something to do with the automatic computer and the amount of air going in that you will actually lose power.
If u really want to use a cheap intake put one together from hardware that you can buy at any hardware store.
Just make sure it is long enough to fit down where your resonator used to be.
You did remove the resonator right?

Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 12:32 AM
  #13  
94integrals's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Pennsylvania
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (NightRider-gsR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NightRider-gsR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What car do you drive again?

A GSR or lower...it doesn't really matter at this point. The matter of fact is, you probably did lose power than gain one from the INCORRECTLY sized diameter of the intake. In this case bigger doesn't mean better. You gotta trust me on this one.

Think about it...for Type-Rs most big brand name companies use 3" diameter intake piping, whereas for GSRs and other models, they use 2.5" diameter or smaller intake piping.

just my 02.
cheers.
NRG</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is not true. AEM is and INJEN seem to use 2.5 inch piping for the B18B, but many other companies use 3 inch piping. After extensive testing, I have found that my generic 3 inch short ram performs a LOT better than the AEM short ram with 2.5 inch piping.

Of course the setup is also an important factor, as you will see bigger gains with an aftermarket intake vs. the stock intake when there are more modifications. My car is only lightly modified with DC headers and an RS*R exhaust. You won't notice much of a gain with a short ram as a first and only modification.

When I reinstalled my stock intake for comparison, the car performed horribly... It felt like a stock Civic EX. An aftermarket intake is definitely an important modification if you have headers and exhaust. You need to complete the I/H/E, and having the free-er flowing intake allows the engine to breathe better.

The diameter and curvature of the intake pipe have a significant effect on the flow characteristics of the air, which thereby affects performance. I have gone through a number of intakes in the 9 years that I have owned my car, and the 3 inch mandrel bent pipe provides the best high end power and throttle response.

You can see a previous post about my AEM short ram comparison:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=270191

Also take a look at the thread that was posted earlier, about the J's Racing intake posted by newgsrdriver... I have always felt that larger intake chambers are better for throttle response and high end power. That is probably why many American and Japanese track integras use larger intake pipes like J's, and even NSX air boxes.

Another thing is to follow the correct procedure for resetting the car's computer. If the ECU has not adjusted to the increased air flow, you will be more likely to see losses in power than gains.

I also noticed that you said, "acceleration and torque are lacking from 2000-4000." This is not surprising on a lightly modified car, since short ram intakes aren't known for low end power. You will see more of a gain up near 5000-7000. Power is also affected by the temperature of the intake charge as you probably know. This is why it is important to route cold air up to the intake using dryer hose or something. When I did this, there was a marked improvement in performance. AEM CAIs are known for their power spike in the lower rpms, so maybe this is a better intake for you. Personally, if I had the $$$, I would go with a J's racing intake with cold air ducting to the front air dam. Check out how it beats the AEM CAI on the dyno... The stock Type R box even performed better.

https://honda-tech.com/zero...age=1
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 05:25 AM
  #14  
StyleTEG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 3,643
Likes: 1
From: assville, MI, USA
Default Re: AARGG! 3" Short Ram - Power Loss - WHY? (94integrals)

The calculated *BEST* intake diameter size is based on your throttle body, and it should be 25% more cross diameter than the bore of the TB.

The optimal size of the TB is based on your intake manifold plenum, runner length and size.

See a pattern? It all works together as a system, you can't just pick random parts and expect great performance.

3" is overkill, you would need about a 64mm TB in order for it to work properly together as a system.

I am not sure what testing you have done NightRider, maybe you can post some dyno graphs?

Diameter is very important, you go larger and shorter(length of the pipe) you can flow higher quantities of air at the sacrifice of velocity. This alters where volumetric effiecency occurs, generally the larger the diameter and the shorter the pipe the higher it occurs.

There is a limit though, if you are throwing more air at the TB than it can flow, its just going to slow down your intake velocity and decrease performance. The key is properly size, not just the biggest pipe you can find.
Reply
Old Jun 1, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #15  
Type Wah's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,190
Likes: 0
From: Longview, wa, usa
Default

I ran 16.1 with my CAI, and 16.9 with 3" short ram..

Vote = CAI
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rayo53
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
26
Jun 9, 2011 11:30 AM
iPaul05
Honda Civic (2001 - 2005)
41
Mar 24, 2007 03:52 PM
vinuneuro
Honda Prelude
2
Sep 23, 2006 11:26 AM
EGBuddy
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
6
May 14, 2006 10:04 PM
grngsr01
Acura Integra
2
Feb 17, 2002 08:53 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:46 AM.