AEM fuel rail question
Anyone know the tread size at the fuel inlet end? I want to order AN fittings.
Thanks.
Edit: should have added that this is for the AEM part number 25-104 rail.
Also found this: http://www.hondaprelude.to/install_fuelline.html
Modified by kb58 at 5:39 AM 5/30/2003
Thanks.
Edit: should have added that this is for the AEM part number 25-104 rail.
Also found this: http://www.hondaprelude.to/install_fuelline.html
Modified by kb58 at 5:39 AM 5/30/2003
its -6....youll want a 6 to 4 reducer and youll want -4 fuel line.....make sure that you use a 90 degree fitting off of your rail or you will have a hard time bending the line to your filter....youll need an aem filter too...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kb58 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Anyone know the tread size at the fuel inlet end? I want to order AN fittings.
Thanks.
Edit: should have added that this is for the AEM part number 25-104 rail.
Also found this: http://www.hondaprelude.to/install_fuelline.html
Modified by kb58 at 5:39 AM 5/30/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>
nice info on the post..but i just wanted to know that is a upgraded fuel rail neccessary..i mean cant the stock rail be more than enough untill u got up to 440cc injectors and over 300hp??..im curious
Thanks.
Edit: should have added that this is for the AEM part number 25-104 rail.
Also found this: http://www.hondaprelude.to/install_fuelline.html
Modified by kb58 at 5:39 AM 5/30/2003</TD></TR></TABLE>
nice info on the post..but i just wanted to know that is a upgraded fuel rail neccessary..i mean cant the stock rail be more than enough untill u got up to 440cc injectors and over 300hp??..im curious
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Project H22DC4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
nice info on the post..but i just wanted to know that is a upgraded fuel rail neccessary..i mean cant the stock rail be more than enough untill u got up to 440cc injectors and over 300hp??..im curious</TD></TR></TABLE>A stock rail is fine for 300 hp.....A new fuel rail is pretty and also nice to have when running nitrous lines and fuel guage senders....good for the FPR also...thats the reason i got them
nice info on the post..but i just wanted to know that is a upgraded fuel rail neccessary..i mean cant the stock rail be more than enough untill u got up to 440cc injectors and over 300hp??..im curious</TD></TR></TABLE>A stock rail is fine for 300 hp.....A new fuel rail is pretty and also nice to have when running nitrous lines and fuel guage senders....good for the FPR also...thats the reason i got them
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Project H22DC4 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
nice info on the post..but i just wanted to know that is a upgraded fuel rail neccessary..i mean cant the stock rail be more than enough untill u got up to 440cc injectors and over 300hp??..im curious</TD></TR></TABLE>
My opinion is that they're a useless, extremely marked up part, sold to people wanting to appear cool. I mean, how many cars out there are *really* "fuel-rail limited." I bought it because I wanted to have a direct AN inlet port without using banjo fittings. I didn't want to modify the stock part for AN fittings, so I bought the AEM part purely for function, not for looks.
nice info on the post..but i just wanted to know that is a upgraded fuel rail neccessary..i mean cant the stock rail be more than enough untill u got up to 440cc injectors and over 300hp??..im curious</TD></TR></TABLE>
My opinion is that they're a useless, extremely marked up part, sold to people wanting to appear cool. I mean, how many cars out there are *really* "fuel-rail limited." I bought it because I wanted to have a direct AN inlet port without using banjo fittings. I didn't want to modify the stock part for AN fittings, so I bought the AEM part purely for function, not for looks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TRUST8383
Forced Induction
8
Dec 4, 2003 06:26 AM




